A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being

References

• Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulo, V. (2017). Internet use and problematic internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–454. doi:10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., & Sodini, M. (2012). See you on Facebook! A framework for analyzing the role of computer-mediated interaction in the evolution of social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(5), 541–547. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.04.024
   Google Scholar
• Arthaud-Day, M. L., Rode, J. C., Mooney, C. H., & Near, J. P. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445–476. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8209-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basabe, N., Páez, D., Valencia, J., Gonzalez, J. L., Rimé, B., & Diener, E. (2002). Cultural dimensions, socioeconomic development, climate, and emotional hedonic level. Cognition & Emotion, 16(1), 103–125. doi:10.1080/02699930143000158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basabe, N., & Ros, M. (2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism-collectivism and power distance. International Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 189–225.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721–736. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F., & Tveito, V. (2018). Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework. Research Policy, 47(1), 308–325. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çikrıkci, O. (2016). The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 560–566. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187–195. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Vol. 38. Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 71–91). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Dienlin, T., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 71–87. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining well-being. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4
   Google Scholar
• Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revision [Prevalence and consequences of cyberbullying: A review]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233–254.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Mazzieri, S. (2014, November). Bienestar eudaimónico y uso de redes sociales virtuales. [Eudaimonic well-being and use of virtual social networks]. Paper presented at the IV International Congress of Research of the Faculty of Psychology of the National University of La Plata, Argentina. Retrieved from http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/48408
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., Patiño, M. G., & Liu, J. H. (2019). Trust in institutional actors across 22 Countries. Examining political, science, and media trust around the world. Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, 74, 237–262. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2019-1329-12en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. H. (2017). Second screening politics in the social media sphere: Advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 193–219. doi:10.1080/08838151.2017.1309420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2017). World Happiness Report 2017. New York, NY: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hervás, G., & López-Gómez, I. (2016). The power of extraverts: Testing positive and negative mood regulation. Anales De Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 710–716. doi:10.6018/analesps.32.3.261641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture´s consequences (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2015). Dimensions data matrix. 6 dimensions for website (version 2015 12 08). Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix/
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 241–249. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2012). Internet use and psychological well-being. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research on cyber behavior (pp. 302–312). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., LaRose, R., & Peng, R. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic internet use: The relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451–455. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schoreder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis research amongst youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. doi:10.1037/a0035618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Makopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & Mcpherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72(3), 403–430. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to twenty questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 509–531. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lischetzke, T., & Eid, M. (2006). Why extraverts are happier than introverts: The role of mood regulation. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 1127–1162. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00405.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E., Dyrenforth, P. S., & Diener, E. (2008). Four myths about subjective well‐being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 2001–2015. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00140.x
   Google Scholar
• Maybery, D. J., Jones-Ellis, J., Neale, J., & Arentz, A. (2006). The positive events scale. Social Indicators Research, 78(1), 61–83. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-4096-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology, 1(3), 249–269. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0103_4
   Google Scholar
• Muuse, L. D., Finkenauer, C., Kerkhorf, P., & Billedo, C. J. (2014). A longitudinal study of the association between compulsive internet use and wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahum-Shani, I., Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2011). Social support and employee well-being: The conditioning effect of perceived patterns of supportive exchange. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(1), 123–139. doi:10.1177/0022146510395024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 842–860. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x
   Google Scholar
• Orban, A. (2018). The trouble knowing how much screen time is ‘too much’. London, UK: BBC News. Retrieved from hppt://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42907037
   Google Scholar
• Pantic, I. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 652–657. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prizant-Passal, S., Shechner, T., & Aderka, I. A. (2016). Social anxiety and internet use – A meta-analysis: What do we know? What are we missing? Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 221–229. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. doi:10.1177/0956797616678438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., … Müller, K. W. (2017). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20(1), 90–115. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Smith, S. M., Carmichael, C. L., Caprariello, P. A., Tsai, F. F., Rodrigues, A., & Maniaci, M. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 311–329. doi:10.1037/a0018344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3–30. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use—A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), JCMC1018. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00226.x
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Zmyslinski-Seelig, A., Kim, J., Drent, A., Victor, A., Omori, K., & Allen, M. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely?: A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446–452. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., Williams, J., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1091–1102. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2015). Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 18(1), 74–105. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.838904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Eijnden, R. J., Meerkerk, G. J., Vermulst, A. A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar