The hyperpersonal effect in online dating: effects of text-based CMC vs. videoconferencing before meeting face-to-face

References

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2012). Interactive uncertainty reduction strategies and verbal affection in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 39, 757–780. doi:10.1177/0093650211410420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 831–836. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social networking sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (1998, July). Cyberspace couples finding romance online then meeting for the first time in real life. CMC Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1998/jul/baker.html
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimmons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. doi:10.111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, G. W. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259–271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1968.tb01473.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Colvin, R. C., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., Shin, S. Y., Kashian, N., Jang, J.-W., & Walther, J. B. (2016). The influence of responses to self-disclosure on liking in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 71, 275–283. doi:10.1177/0261927x15602515
   Google Scholar
• Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. doi:10.1037/h0033731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18(4), 317–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01897.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 193–197. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00573.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Matthews, J. (2007). Speed‐dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 149–166. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38, 70–100. doi:10.1177/0093650210377091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Shebilske, L. J., & Lundgren, S. R. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 522–531. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 367–386. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlyar, I., & Ariely, D. (2013). The effect of nonverbal cues on relationship formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 544–551. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 7, 933–964. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. doi:10.1080/03637757409375845
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr, A., Sumner, E. M., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2015). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 20, 99–114. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr, A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female sexual desire. Personal Relationships, 2, 345–358. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. D., Smith, L. M., & Pollock, C. (1996, September). A model of social interaction via computer-mediated communication in real-time text-based virtual environments. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Psychological Society, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24, 370–391. doi:10.1111/pere.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced during a get acquainted date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391–400. doi:10.1177/0146167294204006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statisticbrain.com (2017). Online dating statistics. Retrieved from http://www.statisticbrain.com/online-dating-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, K. B., & Counts, S. (2008, March). Thin slices of online profile attributes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Web and Social Media.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348. doi:10.1093/hcr/28.3.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. Y. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37, 335–351. doi:10.1177/0093650209356437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., Hancock, J. T., & Slatcher, R. B. (2016). The influence of technology on romantic relationships: Understanding online dating. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media (pp. 162–173). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19(2), 149–164. doi:10.1007/BF01542229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342–369. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–561). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28, 105–134. doi:10.1177/009365001028001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1707–1723. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T., & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar