2,338
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A tripartite model of trust in Facebook: acceptance of information personalization, privacy concern, and privacy literacy

, , &

References

  • Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., de Ruyters, J. C., & Wetzels, M. (2015). Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005
  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545
  • Badshah, N. (2018, April 8). Facebook to contact 87 million users affected by data breach. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/08/facebook-to-contact-the-87-million-users-affected-by-data-breach
  • Bang, H., & Wojdynski, B. W. (2016). Tracking users’ visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 867–876. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.025
  • Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010
  • Barrett, B. (2018, October 12). How to check if your Facebook account got hacked—And how badly. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-hack-check-if-account-affected/
  • Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53. doi:10.1111/jcom.12276
  • Beldad, A. D., & Hegner, S. M. (2017). More photos from me to thee: Factors influencing the intention to continue sharing personal photos on an online social networking (OSN) site among young adults in the Netherlands. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(5), 410–422. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1254890
  • Beldad, A. D., & Koehorst, R. (2015). It’s not about the risks, I’m just used to doing it: disclosure of personal information on Facebook among adolescent Dutch users. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media, SCSM 2015 (Vol. 9182, pp. 185–195). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
  • Beldad, A. D., van der Geest, T., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2012). Shall I tell you where i live and who I am? Factors influencing the behavioral intention to disclose personal data for online government transactions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(3), 163–177. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.572331
  • Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2018). Dual process theory: Systems, types, minds, modes, kinds or metaphors? A critical review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(2), 213–225. doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0376-x
  • Bodó, B., Helberger, N., Eskens, S., & Möller, J. (2019). Interested in diversity. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 206–229. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1521292
  • Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2010). Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Chandra, A. (2009). Targeted advertising: The role of subscriber characteristics in media markets. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(1), 58–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00370.x
  • Cole, L. M., & Cohn, E. S. (2016). Institutional trust across cultures: Its definitions, conceptualizations, and antecedents across Eastern and Western European nations. In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 157–176). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Dahlberg, S., & Linde, J. (2018). Socialization or experience? Institutional trust and satisfaction with democracy among emigrants in different institutional settings. The Journal of Politics, 1389–1393. doi:10.1086/698661
  • Dinesen, P. T. (2011). Where you come from or where you live? Examining the cultural and institutional explanation of generalized trust using migration as a natural experiment. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 114–128. doi:10.1093/esr/jcr044
  • Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., & Warrington, P. (2006). Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. Journal of Business Research, 59(8), 877–886. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.02.006
  • Ermakova, T., Baumann, A., Fabian, B., & Krasnova, H. (2014). Privacy policies and users’ trust: Does readability matter? Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA.
  • Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Gravalos-Gastaminza, M. A., & Perez-Calanas, C. (2017). Facebook and the intention of purchasing tourism products: Moderating effects of gender, age and marital status. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 17(2), 129–144. doi:10.1080/15022250.2015.1137784
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::Aid-bdm333>3.0.Co;2-s
  • Hanoch, Y. (2002). “Neither an angel nor an ant”: Emotion as an aid to bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00065-4
  • Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Malden, MA: Polity.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (abridged edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hwang, Y., & Lee, K. C. (2012). Investigating the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance cultural values on multidimensional online trust. Information & Management, 49(3), 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.02.003
  • Iyer, G., Soberman, D., & Villas-Boas, J. M. (2005). The targeting of advertising. Marketing Science, 24(3), 461–476. doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0117
  • Johnson, J. P. (2013). Targeted advertising and advertising avoidance. The RAND Journal of Economics, 44(1), 128–144. doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12014
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
  • Kalaignanam, K., Kushwaha, T., & Rajavi, K. (2018). How does web personalization create value for online retailers? Lower cash flow volatility or enhanced cash flows. Journal of Retailing, 94(3), 265–279. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2018.05.001
  • Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14(3), 357–366. doi:10.2307/173516
  • Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: The effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635. doi:10.1111/isj.12062
  • Kobsa, A., Cho, H., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2016). The effect of personalization provider characteristics on privacy attitudes and behaviors: An elaboration likelihood model approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2587–2606. doi:10.1002/asi.23629
  • Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
  • Kox, H., Straathof, B., & Zwart, G. (2017). Targeted advertising, platform competition, and privacy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(3), 557–570. doi:10.1111/jems.12200
  • Langenderfer, J., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2009). Privacy in the information economy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 380–388. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01152.x
  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985. doi:10.2307/2578601
  • Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032
  • Malik, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Privacy and trust in Facebook photo sharing: Age and gender differences. Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems, 50(4), 462–480. doi:10.1108/prog-02-2016-0012
  • Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 87–96. doi:10.1177/0165025414552301
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. doi:10.2307/258792
  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. doi:10.5465/256727
  • Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005883
  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies, 34(1), 30–62. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001002
  • Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
  • Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
  • O’Flaherty, K. (2018, October 10). This is why people no longer trust Google and Facebook with their data. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2018/10/10/this-is-why-people-no-longer-trust-google-and-facebook-with-their-data
  • Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40(2), 215–236. doi:10.1177/0093650211418338
  • Park, Y. J., Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2012). Affect, cognition and reward: Predictors of privacy protection online. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1019–1027. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.004
  • Park, Y. J., & Mo Jang, S. (2014). Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 296–303. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.041
  • Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
  • Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., & Chen, Y. (2016). Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 409–419. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.005
  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: DR, 41, 71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  • PytlikZillig, L. M., & Kimbrough, C. D. (2016). Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 17–47). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Schnorf, S., Sedley, A., Ortlieb, M., & Woodruff, A. (2014). A comparison of six sample providers regarding online privacy benchmarks. Paper presented at the SOUPS Workshop on Privacy Personas and Segmentation, Menlo Park, CA.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(2), 529–563.
  • Schumann, J. H., Wangenheim, F., & Groene, N. (2014). Targeted online advertising: Using reciprocity appeals to increase acceptance among users of free web services. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 59–75. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0316
  • Seabo, B., & Molefe, W. (2017). The determinants of institutional trust in Botswana’s liberal democracy. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(3), 36–49. doi:10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0943
  • Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8(4), 365–377. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1992.tb00679.x
  • Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658.
  • Shiyanbola, O. O., Unni, E., Huang, Y.-M., & Lanier, C. (2018). The association of health literacy with illness perceptions, medication beliefs, and medication adherence among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(9), 824–830. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.12.005
  • Stern, M. J., & Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.945062
  • Taylor, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Ellen, P. S. (2015). From trait to state: Understanding privacy concerns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(2), 99–112. doi:10.1108/jcm-07-2014-1078
  • Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., & Lind, F. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “online privacy literacy scale” (OPLIS). In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, & P. de Hert (Eds.), Reforming European data protection law (pp. 333–365). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Turow, J., & Hennessy, M. (2007). Internet privacy and institutional trust: Insights from a national survey. New Media & Society, 9(2), 300–318. doi:10.1177/1461444807072219
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Human development indices and indicators. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf
  • Weinberger, M., Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., & Bouhnik, D. (2017). Factors affecting users’ online privacy literacy among students in Israel. Online Information Review, 41(5), 655–671. doi:10.1108/oir-05-2016-0127
  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.989
  • Winter, J. S. (2014). Surveillance in ubiquitous network societies: Normative conflicts related to the consumer in-store supermarket experience in the context of the internet of things. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 27–41. doi:10.1007/s10676-013-9332-3
  • Wissinger, C. L. (2017). Privacy literacy: From theory to practice. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(2), 378–389. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.2.9
  • Youn, S. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 389–418. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01146.x
  • Zmerli, S., Newton, K., & Montéro, J. R. (2007). Trust in people, confidence in political institutions, and satisfaction with democracy. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies. A comparative analysis (pp. 35–65). London, UK: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.