Embodied Motivation: Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Approach and Avoidance in Virtual Reality

References

• Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/0049124100029001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 819–833. doi:10.1177/0146167203029007002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcetis, E. (2016). Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review, 8(2), 115–128. doi:10.1177/1754073915586225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertenthal, B. I. (2007). Dynamical systems: It’s all about time. In S. Boker & M. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651. doi:10.1177/009365001028005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The international affective picture system (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 29–46). New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Norris, C. J., & Gollan, J. K. (2011). The evaluative space model. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume one (pp. 50–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 221–243. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040153.26156.ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S. (2006). Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9044–7
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., & Zangrando, N. (2010). The persuasive power of virtual reality: Effects of simulated human distress on attitudes towards fire safety. In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6137. (pp. 58–69). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_8
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, R. B., Lang, A., Leshner, G., & Quick, B. L. (2019). Who fights, who flees? An integration of the LC4MP and psychological reactance theory. Media Psychology, 22(4), 545–571. doi:10.1080/15213269.2018.1476157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldsen, D. R., Rhodes, N., & Fazio, R. H. (2015). The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology, 18(3), 312–337. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.937440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. T., Keene, J. R., Huskey, R., & Weber, R. (2018). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing: Taking stock of the past. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(4), 270–290. doi:10.1080/23808985.2018.1534552
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95–113. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
   Google Scholar
• Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4). doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T., Birdwhistell, R. L., Bock, B., Bohannan, P., Diebold, A. R., Edmonson, M. S., … Vayda, A. P. (1968). Proxemics [and comments and replies]. Current Anthropology, 9(2/3), 83–108. doi:10.1086/200975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2011). Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 311–313. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the international affective picture system: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(8), 855–879. doi:10.1177/0146167298248006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokinen, J. P. P. (2015). Emotional user experience: Traits, events, and states☆. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 76, 67–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, T. R., & Simpkins, S. (2001). The effects of stance configuration and target distance on reaching. Experimental Brain Research, 136(4), 439–446. doi:10.1007/s002210000604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The sage handbook of mass media effects (pp. 193–204). Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2014). Dynamic Human-Centered Communication Systems Theory. The Information Society, 30(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.856364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., & Bailey, R. L. (2015). Understanding information selection and encoding from a dynamic, energy saving, evolved, embodied, embedded perspective. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/hcre.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Sparks, J. V., & Lee, S. (2007). The motivation activation measure (MAM): How well does MAM predict individual differences in physiological indicators of appetitive and aversive activation? Communication Methods and Measures, 1(2), 113–136. doi:10.1080/19312450701399370
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Kurita, S., Rubenking, B. R., & Potter, R. F. (2011). MiniMAM: Validating a short version of the motivation activation measure. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 146–162. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.568377
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A., & Lee, S. (2014). Individual differences in trait motivational reactivity influence children and adolescents’ responses to pictures of taboo products. Journal of Health Communication, 19(9), 1030–1046. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.864733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Sanders-Jackson, A., Wang, Z., & Rubenking, B. (2013). Motivated message processing: How motivational activation influences resource allocation, encoding, and storage of TV messages. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 508–517. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9329-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Eden, A., Ewoldsen, D. R., Beyea, D., & Lee, S. (2019). Seeing possibilities for action: Orienting and exploratory behaviors in VR. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 158–165. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B. J., Bailenson, J. N., Pines, A., Greenleaf, W. J., & Williams, L. M. (2017). A public database of immersive VR videos with corresponding ratings of arousal, valence, and correlations between head movements and self report measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6–10. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, G. J., Evans, N. J., Wojdynski, B. W., Ahn, S. J., Len-Rios, M. E., Carera, K., … McFalls, D. (2020). Using immersive virtual reality to improve the beliefs and intentions of influenza vaccine avoidant 18-to-49-year-olds: Considerations, effects, and lessons learned. Vaccine, 38(5), 1225–1233. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellet, É., Boller, B., Corriveau-Lecavalier, N., Cloutier, S., & Belleville, S. (2018). The virtual shop: A new immersive virtual reality environment and scenario for the assessment of everyday memory. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 303, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., Lee, S., & Rubenking, B. E. (2011). Correlating a motivation-activation measure with media preference. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(3), 400–418. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.597468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 198–211. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rougier, M., Muller, D., Ric, F., Alexopoulos, T., Batailler, C., Smeding, A., & Aubé, B. (2018). A new look at sensorimotor aspects in approach/avoidance tendencies: The role of visual whole-body movement information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfe, P., & Glennerster, A. (2015). Using high-fidelity virtual reality to study perception in freely moving observers. Journal of Vision, 15(9), 3. doi:10.1167/15.9.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 1–47. doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stins, J. F., Roelofs, K., Villan, J., Kooijman, K., Hagenaars, M. A., & Beek, P. J. (2011). Walk to me when I smile, step back when I’m angry: Emotional faces modulate whole-body approach–avoidance behaviors. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4), 603–611. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2767-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Wang, X., Zheng, Q., Tao, B., & Zheng, G. (2020). How interaction paradigms affect user experience and perceived interactivity in virtual reality environment.In J. Y. C. Chen & G. Fragomeni (Eds.), (pp. 223–234).HCII 2020:Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. Design and Interaction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49695-1_15
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. (2014). Bridging media processing and selective exposure: A dynamic motivational model of media choices and choice response time. Communication Research, 41(8), 1064–1087. doi:10.1177/0093650214534963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683–703. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsch, R., von Castell, C., Rettenberger, M., Turner, D., Hecht, H., & Fromberger, P. (2020). Sexual attraction modulates interpersonal distance and approach-avoidance movements towards virtual agents in males. PloS One, 15(4), e0231539–e0231539. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., … Biocca, F. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493–525. doi:10.1080/15213260701283079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar