“You See You” (UCU): Self-Representation Affordance Moderates Bandwagon-Cues’ Impacts on Selective Exposure

References

• Bogg, T. (2017). Social media membership, browsing, and profile updating in a representative US sample: Independent and interdependent effects of big five traits and aging and social factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Keum, H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Influencing myself: Self-reinforcement through online political expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppini, D., Duncan, M. A., McLeod, D. M., Wise, D. A., Bialik, K. E., & Wu, Y. (2017). When the whole world is watching: A motivations-based account of selective expression and exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2019). I like what I see: Studying the influence of popularity cues on attention allocation and news selection. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1379550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, I., & Wendelin, M. (2017). Comment counts or news factors or both? Influences on news website users’ news selectioners’ news selection. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2501–2519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, W. W., & Sim, C. C. (2011). Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2382–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Sude, D., & Riva, P. (2020). Toeing the party lie: Ostracism promotes endorsement of partisan election falsehoods. Political Communication, 37(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1666943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haim, M., Kümpel, A. S., & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 7(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F. (2018). Political journalists’ corporate and personal identities on twitter profile pages: A comparative analysis in four Westminster democracies. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Walker, J. (2008). Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, T., Guo, Q., Chen, S., & Yang, J. (2019). What prompts users to click on news headlines? Evidence from unobtrusive data analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2019-0097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Kim, H. K. (2020). My avatar and the affirmed self: Psychological and persuasive implications of avatar customization. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). When self is the source: Effects of media customization on message processing. Media Psychology, 19(4), 561–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapidzic, S. (2020). The social academic: A social capital approach to academic relationship management on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1673–1688. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1610472
   Google Scholar
• Khan Academy. (n.d.). Who Can See Information About My Child? [website]. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://www.khanacademy.org/khan-for-educators/resources/parents-mentors-1/privacy-and-security/a/who-can-see-information-about-my-child
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.-M., & Ihm, J. (2020a). More than virality: Online sharing of controversial news with activated audience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019836950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E.-M., & Ihm, J. (2020b). Online news sharing in the face of mixed audiences: Context collapse, homophily, and types of social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(5), 756–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1835429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Papacharissi, Z. (2003). Cross‐cultural differences in online self‐presentation: A content analysis of personal Korean and US home pages. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980309364833
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). The selective exposure self-and affect-management (SESAM) model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42(7), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214539173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2020, November 27). Media affordances and political polarization: The UCU model. Presentation at the University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. L., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Westerwick, A. (2021). Algorithmic personalization of source cues in the filter bubble: Self-esteem and self-construal impact information exposure. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2095–2117. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Atkinson, L., & Sung, Y. H. (2022). Online bandwagon effects: Quantitative versus qualitative cues in online comments sections. New Media & Society, 24(3), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820965187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, A. D., & Ho, S. S. (2021). Perceiving online public opinion: The impact of Facebook opinion cues, opinion climate congruency, and source credibility on speaking out. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2495–2515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820931054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. The Journal of General Psychology, 5(2), 141–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1931.9918387
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., & Sundar, S. S. (2022). Can interactive media attenuate psychological reactance to health messages? A study of the role played by user commenting and audience metrics in persuasion. Health Communication, 37(11), 1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1888450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media & Society, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., Vafeiadis, M., Xiao, A., & Yang, G. (2020). The role of corporate credibility and bandwagon cues in sponsored social media advertising. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2019-0108
   Google Scholar
• Luong, K. T., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Frampton, J. (2021). Temporal self impacts on media exposure & effects: A test of the Selective exposure self-and Affect-Management (SESAM) model. Media Psychology, 24(1), 48–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1657898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, J., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2018). The impact of cues on perceptions and selection of content in online environment. In Presented at the 4th International Summer School. Germany: University of Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson, A. L., & Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. In Papacharissi, Zizi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 259–281). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 445–466). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, S., & Yang, T. (2020). Choosing to avoid? A conjoint experimental study to understand selective exposure and avoidance on social media. Political Communication, 38(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. I. S. W. (2017). Computer-mediated communication and self-awareness – a selective review. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohme, J., & Mothes, C. (2020). What affects first- and second-level selective exposure to journalistic news? A social media online experiment. Journalism Studies, 21(9), 1220–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1735490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2020). What happens when you click and drag: Unpacking the relationship between on-screen interaction and user engagement with an anti-smoking website. Health Communication, 35(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1560578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S. (2017). ‘Organizational, professional, personal’: An exploratory study of political journalists and their hybrid brand on Twitter. Journalism, 18(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Vitak, J. (2016). Performing honor online: The affordances of social media for surveillance and impression management in an honor culture. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2595–2612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, J., & Ahn, S. J. (2016). Explicating the ‘like’ on Facebook brand pages: The effect of intensity of Facebook use, number of overall ‘likes’, and number of friends’ ‘likes’ on consumers’ brand outcomes. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(5), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2014.941000
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content, and “deindividuation” in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 164–183). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/267513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. R., & Sanderson, J. (2015). I’m going to Instagram it! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.86.5.518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sude, D. J., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Robinson, M. J., & Westerwick, A. (2019). “Pick and choose” opinion climate: How browsing of political messages shapes public opinion perceptions and attitudes. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1612528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sude, D., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2022). Selective exposure and attention to attitude-consistent and attitude-discrepant information. In Strömbäck, J., Wikforss, Å., Glüer, K., Lindholm, T., & Oscarsson, H. Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (1st ed, pp. 88–105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111474-5
   Google Scholar
• Sude, D. J., Pearson, G. D., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2021). Self-expression just a click away: Source interactivity impacts on confirmation bias and political attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, C. C., & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 2, 243–272 .JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N., & Pitt, J. (2007, April). Constructing my online self: Avatars that increase self-focused attention. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 445–448). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240696
   Google Scholar
• Vohs, K., & Baumeister, R. (2004). Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. In R. Baumeister, & K. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1–9). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Sundar, S. S., & Vitak, J. (2022). Liking versus commenting on online news: Effects of expression affordances on political attitudes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(6), zmac018. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Sude, D., Brooks, D., Kaplan, B., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2023). Self-consistency and self-enhancement motivation impacts on selective exposure to politics—A SESAM model application. Mass Communication and Society, 26(2), 300–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2056854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Sude, D., Robinson, M., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2020). Peers versus pros: Confirmation bias in selective exposure to user-generated versus professional media messages and its consequences. Mass Communication and Society, 23(4), 510–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1721542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2016). Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments: Selective use of news cues. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. (2021). What predicts selective exposure online: Testing political attitudes, credibility, and social identity. Communication Research, 48(5), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219844868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2016). Effects of popularity-based news recommendations (“most-viewed”) on users’ exposure to online news. Media Psychology, 19(2), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1006333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M. Z., & Flanagin, A. J. (2006). A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 518–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276488031003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar