Harnessing Anger to Persuade: The Moderating Roles of Retributive Efficacy and Prior Attitudes

References

• Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., & Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Turner, M. M., & Richards, A. S. (2023). Anger, efficacy, and message processing: A test of the anger activism model. Southern Communication Journal, 89(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2250301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigsby, E., & Albarracín, D. (2022). Self- and response efficacy information in fear appeals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S., & Hart, P. S. (2009). The “boomerang” effect: A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 33 (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., & Darley, J. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 193–236). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00004-4
   Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppock, A. (2023). Persuasion in parallel: How information changes minds about politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S123–S139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2020). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Park, E. (2019). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., McStay, R., Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., & Greenaway, K. H. (2015). Evidence for motivated control: Understanding the paradoxical link between threat and efficacy beliefs about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. L., & Zaki, J. (2015). The neuroscience of motivated cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, S. M., Nuñez, N. L., & Schweitzer, K. A. (2016). Unintended, but still blameworthy: The roles of awareness, desire, and anger in negligence, restitution, and punishment. Cognition and Emotion, 30(7), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1058242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive‐functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, A. M., Johnson, G., Ault, M. K., Taylor, W. D., Griffith, J. A., Connelly, S., Dunbar, N. E., & Jensen, M. L. (2017). Reactions to ideological websites: The impact of emotional appeals, credibility, and pre-existing attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestle, M. (2015). Soda politics: Taking on big soda (and winning). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olafsdottir, S., Eiben, G., Prell, H., Hense, S., Lissner, L., Mårild, S., Reisch, L., & Berg, C. (2013). Young children’s screen habits are associated with consumption of sweetened beverages independently of parental norms. International Journal of Public Health, 59(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0473-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. P., Stautz, K., Pilling, M., van der Linden, S., & Marteau, T. M. (2020). Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Royal Society Open Science, 7(1), 190522. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, T., Bigsby, E., & Quick, B. L. (2021). A comparison of three approaches for measuring negative cognitions for psychological reactance. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1810647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011). Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality. Emotion, 11(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2014). Threat, fear, and persuasion: Review and critique of questions about functional form. Review of Communication Research, 2, 94–114. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Skurka, C. (2018). You mad? Using anger appeals to promote activism intentions and policy support in the context of sugary drink marketing to kids. Health Communication, 34(14), 1775–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skurka, C. (2021). Will it teach them a lesson? Validating a measure of retributive efficacy in social issue activism. Political Behavior, 44(4), 1559–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09665-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skurka, C. (2023). Harnessing anger to persuade: The moderating roles of retributive efficacy and prior attitudes. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3HME
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M. (2011). Using emotional appeals in health messages. In H. Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design: Theory and practice (pp. 59–69). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M., Richards, A., Bessarabova, E., & Magid, Y. (2020). The effects of anger appeals on systematic processing and intentions: The moderating role of efficacy. Communication Reports, 33(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Tukachinsky, R., Pelled, A., & Nabi, R. (2018). Meta-analysis of anger and persuasion: An empirical integration of four models. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, J. A., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2019). Losing your temper and your perspective: Anger reduces perspective-taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar