0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Story My Friend Told Me: Examining the Interplay of Message Format and Relational Closeness in Misinformation Correction

&

References

  • American Cancer Society. (2021, August, 2). Nicotine replacement therapy to help you quit tobacco. https://www.cancer.org/healthy/stay-away-from-tobacco/guide-quitting-smoking/nicotine-replacement-therapy.html#written_by
  • Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The transportation scale–short form (TS-SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
  • Baker, S. A., Wade, M., & Walsh, M. J. (2020). The challenges of responding to misinformation during a pandemic: Content moderation and the limitations of the concept of harm. Media International Australia, 177(1), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20951301
  • Big Think. (2024, February 15). Our mission. https://bigthink.com/our-mission/
  • Blankenship, K., Wegener, D., & Murray, R. (2015). Values, inter-attitudinal structure, and attitude change: Value accessibility can increase a related attitude’s resistance to change. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1739–1750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215609063
  • Carpenter, C. J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality × processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12054
  • Carpenter, M. J., Ford, M. E., Cartmell, K., & Alberg, A. J. (2011). Misperceptions of nicotine replacement therapy within racially and ethnically diverse smokers. Journal of the National Medical Association, 103(9–10), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30444-2
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Quit smoking medicines are much safer than smoking. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/quit-smoking/quit-smoking-medications/3-reasons-to-use-medicines-when-you-quit/quit-medicines-are-safer-than-smoking/index.html
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
  • Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2011). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 246–266). Sage.
  • Cho, H., Shen, L., & Wilson, K. (2014). Perceived realism: Dimensions and roles in narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 41(6), 828–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212450585
  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
  • Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl 4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
  • Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles, & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). The unidimensional relationship closeness scale (URCS): Reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 565. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026265
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Butler, L. H., & Hamby, A. (2020). You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
  • Gallus, S., Muttarak, R., Franchi, M., Pacifici, R., Colombo, P., Boffetta, P., Leon, M. E., & La Vecchia, C. (2013). Why do smokers quit? European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 22(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283552da8
  • Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S163–S183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
  • Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
  • Harff, D., Bollen, C., & Schmuck, D. (2022). Responses to social media influencers’ misinformation about COVID-19: A pre-registered multiple-exposure experiment. Media Psychology, 25(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2080711
  • Harper-Rhode, R. (2021, July 28). Trying to quit smoking? One patient succeeded with some ‘totally different’ support. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/releases-20210728
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
  • Huang, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). When a story contradicts: Correcting health misinformation on social media through different message formats and mechanisms. Information Communication & Society, 25(8), 1192–1209. G:\Users\nicolekashian\Dropbox\t https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851390
  • Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00691.x
  • Kashian, N., & Wang, W. (2021). The influence of sensitive health disclosure on liking and likelihood of response in a non-health-related context, facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106752
  • Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
  • Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210365537
  • Levy, S. (2021). Nicotine addiction explained — and how medications can help. Harvard health publishing. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/nicotine-addiction-explained-and-how-medications-can-help-202107272554
  • Mena, P., Barbe, D., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2020). Misinformation on Instagram: The impact of trusted endorsements on message credibility. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120935102
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
  • Miller-Day, M., & Hecht, M. L. (2013). Narrative means to preventive ends: A narrative engagement framework for designing prevention interventions. Health Communication, 28(7), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.762861
  • Mooney, M. E., Leventhal, A. M., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2006). Attitudes and knowledge about nicotine and nicotine replacement therapy. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 8(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200600670397
  • Moyer-Gus, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
  • Niederdeppe, J., Heley, K., & Barry, C. L. (2015). Inoculation and narrative strategies in competitive framing of three health policy issues. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12162
  • Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  • Oschatz, C., & Marker, C. (2020). Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa017
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41(5), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Strathman, A. J., & Priester, J. R. (2005). To think or not to think: Exploring two routes to persuasion. In T. C. Brock, & M. C. Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (2nd ed. pp. 81–116). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Pluviano, S., Watt, C., Della Sala, S., & Moore, A. C. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies. PLoS One, 12(7), e0181640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181640
  • Sangalang, A., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz014
  • Sherry, J. L. (2002). Media saturation and entertainment? education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.2.206
  • Shin, I., Wang, L., & Lu, Y. T. (2022). Twitter and endorsed (fake) news: The influence of endorsement by strong ties, celebrities, and a user majority on credibility of fake news during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2573–2595. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18187
  • Shmerling, R. H. (2021). Can vaping help you quit smoking?. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/can-vaping-help-you-quit-smoking-2019022716086
  • Slater, M. (1991). Use of message stimuli in mass communication experiments: A methodological assessment and discussion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 68(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909106800312
  • Suarez-Lledo, V., & Alvarez-Galvez, J. (2021). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e17187. https://doi.org/10.2196/17187
  • Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2022). The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 50(2), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01232-8
  • US Food and Drug Administration. (2022). What it’s like to quit smoking. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/health-effects-tobacco-use/what-its-quit-smoking
  • Vafeiadis, M., Wang, W., Baker, M., & Shen, F. (2022). Examining the effects of celebrity (vs. noncelebrity) narratives on opioid addiction prevention: Identification, transportation, and the moderating role of personal relevance. Journal of Health Communication, 27(5), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2097752
  • Villanti, A. C., Byron, M. J., Mercincavage, M., & Pacek, L. R. (2019). Misperceptions of nicotine and nicotine reduction: The importance of public education to maximize the benefits of a nicotine reduction standard. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 21(1), S88–S90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz103
  • Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776
  • Walter, N., Bilandzic, H., Schwarz, N., & Brooks, J. J. (2021). Metacognitive approach to narrative persuasion: The desirable and undesirable consequences of narrative disfluency. Media Psychology, 24(5), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1789477
  • Walter, N., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J., & Suresh, S. (2020). Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 36(13), 1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553
  • Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
  • Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
  • Wang, W., & Huang, Y. (2021). Countering the “harmless e-cigarette” myth: The interplay of message format, message sidedness, and prior experience with e-cigarette use in misinformation correction. Science Communication, 43(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020974384
  • Weiss, A., Burgmer, P., & Hofmann, W. (2022). The experience of trust in everyday life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.016
  • Weiss, A., Michels, C., Burgmer, P., Mussweiler, T., Ockenfels, A., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Trust in everyday life. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 121(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000334

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.