Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. (Indian mustard): a putative plant species to facilitate the phytoremediation of mercury contaminated soils

References

• Alloway BJ. 2013. Sources of heavy metals and metalloids in soils. In: Alloway BJ, editor. Heavy metals in soils. Trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 11–50.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. 1989. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association (APHA), AWWA, WPCF.
   Google Scholar
• Back SK, Sung JH, Moon YH, Kim YH, Seok KS, Song GJ, Seo YC. 2017. Mercury distribution characteristics in primary manganese smelting plants. Environ Pollut. 227:357–363. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharagava RN, Chandra R, Rai V. 2008. Phytoextraction of trace elements and physiological changes in Indian mustard plants (Brassica nigra L.) grown in post methanated distillery effluent (PMDE) irrigated soil. Bioresour Technol. 99(17):8316–8324. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassina L, Tassi E, Pedron F, Petruzzelli G, Ambrosini P, Barbafieri M. 2012. Using a plant hormone and a thioligand to improve phytoremediation of Hg-contaminated soil from a petrochemical plant. J Hazard Mater. 231:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Yadav S, Mohan D. 2009. Accumulation and distribution of toxic metals in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica campestris L.) irrigated with distillery and tannery effluents. J Hazard Mater. 162(2–3):1514–1521. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciavatta L, Grimaldi M. 1968. The hydrolysis of mercury (II) chloride, HgCl2. J Inorg Nuc Chem. 30(2):563–581. doi:10.1016/0022-1902(68)80483-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar MI, Green ID, Naikoo MI, Khan FA, Ansari AA, Lone MI. 2017. Assessment of biotransfer and bioaccumulation of cadmium, lead and zinc from fly ash amended soil in mustard–aphid–beetle food chain. Sci Total Environ. 584:1221–1229. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Maiti SK. 2009. Growth of Cymbopogon citrates and Vetiveria zizanioides on Cu mine tailings amended with chicken manure and manure-soil mixtures: a pot scale study. Int J Phytoremediation. 11(8):651–663. doi:10.1080/15226510802568547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Abreu CA, Coscione AR, Pires AM, Paz-Ferreiro J. 2012. Phytoremediation of a soil contaminated by heavy metals and boron using castor oil plants and organic matter amendments. J Geochem Explor. 123:3–7. doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Bai Z, Li H, Qiao J, Xu J, Li X. 2011. Potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in reclaimed soils. Trans CSAE. 27:348–354.
   Google Scholar
• Feng X, Li P, Qiu G, Wang S, Li G, Shang L, Meng B, Jiang H, Bai W, Li Z, et al. 2008. Human exposure to methylmercury through rice intake in mercury mining areas, Guizhou Province, China. Environ Sci Technol. 42(1):326–332. doi:10.1021/es071948x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez R, Loredo J, Ordóñez A, Rucandio MI. 2005. Distribution and mobility of mercury in soils from an old mining area in Mieres, Asturias (Spain). Sci Total Environ. 346(1–3):200–212. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentili R, Ambrosini R, Montagnani C, Caronni S, Citterio S. 2018. Effect of soil pH on the growth, reproductive investment and pollen allergenicity of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Front Plant Sci. 9:1335. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Kingston HM, Boylan HM, Rahman GM, Shah S, Richter RC, Link DD, Bhandari S. 2003. Speciation of mercury in soil and sediment by selective solvent and acid extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 375(3):428–436. doi:10.1007/s00216-002-1701-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques B, Rocha LS, Lopes CB, Figueira P, Monteiro RJ, Duarte AC, Pardal MA, Pereira E. 2015. Study on bioaccumulation and biosorption of mercury by living marine macroalgae: prospecting for a new remediation biotechnology applied to saline waters. Chem Eng J. 281:759–770. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlodák M, Urík M, Matúš P, Kořenková L. 2016. Mercury in mercury (II)-spiked soils is highly susceptible to plant bioaccumulation. Int J Phytoremediation. 18(2):195–199. doi:10.1080/15226514.2015.1073675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein HS, Ruiz ON, Terry N, Daniell H. 2007. Phytoremediation of mercury and organomercurials in chloroplast transgenic plants: enhanced root uptake, translocation to shoots, and volatilization. Environ Sci Technol. 41(24):8439–8446. doi:10.1021/es070908q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Engle-Wood Cliffs (NT): Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jedrzejczak R, Szteke B, Reczajska W. 1996. [Mercury determination in food of plant origin by cole vapour atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS)]). Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 47(2):223–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamble PN, Giri SP, Mane RS, Tiwana A. 2015. Estimation of chlorophyll content in young and adult leaves of some selected plants. Universal J Environ Res Technol. 5:306–310.
   Google Scholar
• Karak T, Bhattacharyya P, Paul RK, Das DK. 2013. Metal accumulation, biochemical response and yield of Indian mustard grown in soil amended with rural roadside pond sediment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 92:161–173. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KR, Owens G, Kwon SL. 2010. Influence of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) on rhizosphere soil solution chemistry in long-term contaminated soils: a rhizobox study. J Environ Sci. 22(1):98–105. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60080-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Maiti SK. 2015. Effect of organic manures on the growth of Cymbopogon citratus and Chrysopogon zizanioides for the phytoremediation of Chromite-Asbestos mine waste: a pot scale experiment. Int J Phytoremediation. 17 (5):437–447. doi:10.1080/15226514.2014.910174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JM, Salido AL, Butcher DJ. 2004. Phytoremediation of lead using Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) with EDTA and electrodics. Microchem J. 76(1–2):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionetto MG, Caricato R, Calisi A, Giordano ME, Erroi E, Schettino T. 2016. Biomonitoring of water and soil quality: a case study of ecotoxicological methodology application to the assessment of reclaimed agroindustrial wastewaters used for irrigation. Rend Fis Acc Lincei. 27(1):105–112. doi:10.1007/s12210-015-0486-2.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang J, Ning Y, Yang S, Wang P, Shaheen SM, Feng X, Rinklebe J. 2019. Methylmercury production in a paddy soil and its uptake by rice plants as affected by different geochemical mercury pools. Environ Int. 129:461–469. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang LA, Xu J, Ding S, Feng X, Xiao H. 2017. Effects of different concentrations of mercury on accumulation of mercury by five plant species. Ecol Eng. 106:273–278. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti SK, Jaiswal S. 2008. Bioaccumulation and translocation of metals in the natural vegetation growing on fly ash lagoons: a field study from Santaldih thermal power plant, West Bengal, India. Environ Monit Assess. 136(1–3):355–370. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-9691-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti SK. 2013. Ecorestoration of coal mine degraded lands. New Delhi: Springer Science and Business Media, Springer India.
   Google Scholar
• Marrugo-Negrete J, Durango-Hernández J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Enamorado-Montes G, Díez S. 2016. Mercury uptake and effects on growth in Jatropha curcas. J Environ Sci. 48:120–125. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2015.10.036.
   Google Scholar
• Marrugo-Negrete J, Durango-Hernández J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Olivero-Verbel J, Díez S. 2015. Phytoremediation of mercury-contaminated soils by Jatropha curcas. Chemosphere. 127:58–63. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgar MJ, Alonso J, García MA. 2009. Mercury in edible mushrooms and underlying soil: bioconcentration factors and toxicological risk. Sci Total Environ. 407(20):5328–5334. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra VK, Tripathi BD, Kim KH. 2009. Removal and accumulation of mercury by aquatic macrophytes from an open cast coal mine effluent. J Hazard Mater. 172(2–3):749–754. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno FN, Sígolo JB, Anderson CW, Stewart RB, Meech JA, Robinson BH. 2005. Phytoremediation of mercury contaminated mine wastes [PhD Thesis]. Palmerston North (New Zealand): Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Madison (WI): Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy. p. 961–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Park SI, Kim YS, Kim JJ, Mok JE, Kim YH, Park HM, Kim IS, Yoon HS. 2017. Improved stress tolerance and productivity in transgenic rice plants constitutively expressing the Oryza sativa glutathione synthetase OsGS under paddy field conditions. J Plant Physiol. 215:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoschi AM, Pop A. 2015. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 97:55–74. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj D, Chowdhury A, Maiti SK. 2017. Ecological risk assessment of mercury and other heavy metals in soils of coal mining area: a case study from the eastern part of a Jharia coal field, India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 23(4):767–787. doi:10.1080/10807039.2016.1278519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis AT, Rodrigues SM, Davidson CM, Pereira E, Duarte AC. 2010. Extractability and mobility of mercury from agricultural soils surrounding industrial and mining contaminated areas. Chemosphere. 81(11):1369–1377. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuilov S, Lang F, Djukic M, Djunisijevic-Bojovic D, Rennenberg H. 2016. Lead uptake increases drought tolerance of wild type and transgenic poplar (Populus tremula × P. alba) overexpressing gsh 1. Environ Pollut. 216:773–785. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandrin TR, Hoffman DR. 2007. Bioremediation of organic and metal co-contaminated environments: effects of metal toxicity, speciation, and bioavailability on biodegradation. In: Environmental bioremediation technologies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Sinha S. 2005. Accumulation of metals and its effects in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. (cv. Rohini) grown on various amendments of tannery waste. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 62(1):118–127. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.12.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith IK, Vierheller TL, Thorne CA. 1988. Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5, 5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). Anal Biochem. 175(2):408–413. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(88)90564-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Han FX, Chen J, Sridhar BM, Monts DL. 2008. Phytoextraction and accumulation of mercury in three plant species: Indian mustard (Brassica juncea), beard grass (Polypogon monospeliensis), and Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata). Int J Phytoremediation. 10(6):547–560. doi:10.1080/15226510802115091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu C, Ma LQ, Bondada B. 2002. Arsenic accumulation in the hyperaccumulator Chinese brake and its utilization potential for phytoremediation. J Environ Qual. 31(5):1671–1675. doi:10.2134/jeq2002.1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2007. Method 7473: mercury in solids and solution by thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Washington (DC): USEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P. 2002. Electrokinetic soil remediation—critical overview. Sci Total Environ. 289(1–3):97–121. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01027-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Anderson CW, Xing Y, Fan Y, Xia J, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Feng X. 2018. Thiosulphate-induced phytoextraction of mercury in Brassica juncea: spectroscopic investigations to define a mechanism for Hg uptake. Environ Pollut. 242:986–993. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Feng X, Anderson CW, Wang H, Zheng L, Hu T. 2012. Implications of mercury speciation in thiosulfate treated plants. Environ Sci Technol. 46(10):5361–5368. doi:10.1021/es204331a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Feng X, Anderson CW, Xing Y, Shang L. 2012. Remediation of mercury contaminated sites–a review. J Hazard Mater. 221:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Shaheen SM, Swertz AC, Rennert T, Feng X, Rinklebe J. 2019. Sulfur-modified organoclay promotes plant uptake and affects geochemical fractionation of mercury in a polluted floodplain soil. J Hazard Mater. 371:687–693. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xing Y, Xie Y, Meng Y, Xia J, Feng X. 2019. The use of calcium carbonate-enriched clay minerals and diammonium phosphate as novel immobilization agents for mercury remediation: Spectral investigations and field applications. Sci Total Environ. 646:1615–1623. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Bravo AG, Lagerkvist A, Bertilsson S, Sjöblom R, Kumpiene J. 2015. Sources and remediation techniques for mercury contaminated soil. Environ Int. 74:42–53. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xun Y, Feng L, Li Y, Dong H. 2017. Mercury accumulation plant Cyrtomium macrophyllum and its potential for phytoremediation of mercury polluted sites. Chemosphere. 189:161–170. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanqun Z, Yuan L, Jianjun C, Haiyan C, Li Q, Schvartz C. 2005. Hyperaccumulation of Pb, Zn and Cd in herbaceous grown on lead–zinc mining area in Yunnan, China. Environ Int. 31(5):755–762. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao DX, Meng J, Zhang ZG. 2010. Heavy metal pollution and potential ecological risk in reclaimed soils in Huainan mining area. J Coal Sci Eng China. 16(3):316–319. doi:10.1007/s12404-010-0319-y.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ. 2006. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci Total Environ. 368(2-3):456–464. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zornoza P, Millán R, Sierra MJ, Seco A, Esteban E. 2010. Efficiency of white lupin in the removal of mercury from contaminated soils: soil and hydroponic experiments. J Environ Sci. 22(3):421–427. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60124-8.
   Google Scholar