Effect of clay and guishe-ash as substrate on Lycopersicon esculentum germination and production

References

• Akhtar SS, Li G, Andersen MN, Liu F. 2014. Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agric Water Manag. 138:37–44. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Amri SM. 2013. Improved growth, productivity and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants through application of shikimic acid. Saudi J Biol Sci. 20(4):339–345. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.03.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcántara Trejo JL. 2014. Producción orgánica de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) bajo diferentes dosis de compost como sustrato en invernadero. Saltillo: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
   Google Scholar
• Avaca FM. 2015. Efectos de la salinidad y la alcalinidad sobre la germinación y el crecimiento vegetativo temprano de Chloris gayana Kunth. Buenos Aires: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/tesis/efectos-salinidad-alcalinidad-germinacion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Awad AM, Shaikh SMR, Jalab R, Gulied MH, Nasser MS, Benamor A, Adham S. 2019. Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: a comprehensive review. Sep Purif Technol. 228:115719. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camejo-Serrano Y, Ramírez-Fernández R, Rivera-Pineda F, González-Cepero M, Licea-Castro L, Porra-León E. 2016. Effect of the combined treatment of low X-rays doses and Biobras-16 on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. Vyta for salinity conditions. Cultiv Trop. 37(3):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Chu Y-H, Jang J-C, Huang Z, van der Knaap E. 2019. Tomato locule number and fruit size controlled by natural alleles of lc and fas. Plant Direct. 3(7):1–20. doi:10.1002/pld3.142.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz NC, Silva FC, Tarelho LAC, Rodrigues SM. 2019. Critical review of key variables affecting potential recycling applications of ash produced at large-scale biomass combustion plants. Resour Conserv Recycl. 150:104427. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104427.
   Google Scholar
• Cuartero J, Fernández-Muñoz R. 1998. Tomato and salinity. Sci Hortic. 78(1–4):83–125. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00191-5.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Jiménez L, Carlos-Hernandez S, Jasso de Rodríguez D, Rodríguez-García R. 2019. Conceptualization of a biorefinery for guishe revalorization. Ind Crops Prod. 138:111441. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-García N, Martínez V, Cerdá A, Carvajal M. 2004. Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 79(6):995–1001. doi:10.1080/14620316.2004.11511880.
   Google Scholar
• González Ragoytia D. 2013. Efecto de coayuvantes de la nutrición del tomate (Lycopersicon sculentum Mill.) establecido en un sistema hidropónico de raíz flotante. Saltillo: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
   Google Scholar
• González-Mendoza D, Zapata-Pérez O. 2017. Mecanismos de tolerancia a elementos potencialmente tóxicos en plantas. Bot Sci. 82(82):53–61. doi:10.17129/botsci.1781.
   Google Scholar
• Ismadji S, Soetaredjo FE, Ayucitra A. 2015. Clay materials for environmental remediation. In: Sharma SK, editor. 1st ed. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jarquín-Enríquez L, Mercado-Silva EM, Maldonado JL, Lopez-Baltazar J. 2013. Lycopene content and color index of tomatoes are affected by the greenhouse cover. Sci Hortic. 155:43–48. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Legland D, Devaux MF, Bouchet B, Guillon F, Lahaye M. 2012. Cartography of cell morphology in tomato pericarp at the fruit scale. J Microsc. 247(1):78–93. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03623.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li C, Xiong Y, Qu Z, Xu X, Huang Q, Huang G. 2018. Impact of biochar addition on soil properties and water-fertilizer productivity of tomato in semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia, China. Geoderma. 331(June):100–108. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.014.
   Google Scholar
• López-Millán AF, Sagardoy R, Solanas M, Abadía A, Abadía J. 2009. Cadmium toxicity in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants grown in hydroponics. Environ Exp Bot. 65(2–3):376–385. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna Fontalvo JA, Córdoba López LS, Gil Pertuz KI, Romero Borja IM. 2013. Effect of agroforestry residues parially biodegraded by Pleurotus ostreatus (Pleurotaceae) on tomato seedlings development. Acta Biol Colomb. 18(2):357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Ma N, Feng H, Meng X, Li D, Yang D, Wu C, Meng Q. 2014. Overexpression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor alters fruit pigmentation and softening. BMC Plant Biol. 14(351):351–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manjaiah KM, Mukhopadhyay R, Paul R, Datta SC, Kumararaja P, Sarkar B. 2019. Clay minerals and zeolites for environmentally sustainable agriculture. In: Modif clay zeolite nanocomposite mater. Vol. 2025. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; p. 309–329.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier A. 2005. Clays. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fb138672.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsenian Y, Roosta HR. 2015. Effects of grafting on alkali stress in tomato plants: datura rootstock improve alkalinity tolerance of tomato plants. J Plant Nutr. 38(1):51–72. doi:10.1080/01904167.2014.920370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muños S, Ranc N, Botton E, Bérard A, Rolland S, Duffé P, Carretero Y, Le Paslier M-C, Delalande C, Bouzayen M, et al. 2011. Increase in tomato locule number is controlled by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms located near WUSCHEL. Plant Physiol. 156(4):2244–2254. doi:10.1104/pp.111.173997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musseau C, Just D, Jorly J, Gévaudant F, Moing A, Chevalier C, Lemaire-Chamley M, Rothan C, Fernandez L. 2017. Identification of two new mechanisms that regulate fruit growth by cell expansion in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 8(988):988–915.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabeela F, Murad W, Khan I, Mian IA, Rehman H, Adnan M, Azizullah A. 2015. Effect of wood ash application on the morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters of Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol Biochem. 95:15–25. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narváez-Ortiz WA, Benavides-Mendoza A, Robledo-Torres V, Mendoza-Villarreal R. 2013. Textile sludge effectiveness on the production and chemical composition of tomato fruit. Rev Mex Ciencias Agrícolas. 4(1):129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco da Costa T, Quinteiro P, Tarelho LAC, Arroja L, Dias AC. 2020. Life cycle assessment of woody biomass ash for soil amelioration. Waste Manag. 101:126–140. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandey DS, Kwapinska M, Leahy JJ, Kwapinski W. 2019. Fly ash from poultry litter gasification – can it be utilised in agriculture systems as a fertiliser? Energy Procedia. 161:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.056.
   Google Scholar
• Patwary MA, Rahman MM, Ahmad S, Miah MK, Barua H. 2013. Study of heterosis in heat tolerant tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) during summer. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 38(3):531–544. doi:10.3329/bjar.v38i3.16980.
   Google Scholar
• Peña MY, Casierra Posada F, Monsalve OI. 2014. Soilless tomato production (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in rice hulls mixed with mineral and organic materials. Rev Colomb Cienc Hortic. 7(2):217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes DP, Carvalho D. F d, Pinto MF, Valença DDC, Medici LO. 2017. Growth and production of tomate fertilized with ash and castor cake and under varying water depths, cultivated in organic potponics. Acta Sci Agron. 39(2):201–209. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v39i2.32547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranagal J, Oleszczuk P, Tomaszewska-Krojańska D, Kraska P, Różyło K. 2017. Effect of biochar application on the physical properties of Haplic Podzol. Soil Tillage Res. 174(August 2016):92–103. doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.06.007.
   Google Scholar
• Rendón Padrón S. 2012. Evaluación de seis cultivares de tomate en campo abierto en General Cepeda, Coahuila. Saltillo: Universidad Autónoma Agragaria Antonio Narro.
   Google Scholar
• Saletnik B, Bajcar M, Zagula G, Czernicka M, Puchalski C. 2016. Influence of biochar and biomass ash applied as soil amendment on germination rate of Virginia mallow seeds (Sida hermaphrodita R.). Econtechmod. 5(3):71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Salim MMR, Rashid MH, Hossain MM, Zakaria M. 2018. Morphological characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 19(3):233–240. [Internet].: doi:10.1016/j.jssas.2018.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago J, Mendoza M, Borrego F. 2016. Evaluación de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill) en invernadero: criterios fenológicos y fisiológicos. Agron Mesoam. 9(1):59–65. doi:10.15517/am.v9i1.24633.
   Google Scholar
• Schapel A, Marschner P, Churchman J. 2018. Clay amount and distribution influence organic carbon content in sand with subsoil clay addition. Soil Tillage Res. 184:253–260. doi:10.1016/j.still.2018.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Silva FC, Cruz NC, Tarelho LAC, Rodrigues SM. 2019. Use of biomass ash-based materials as soil fertilisers: critical review of the existing regulatory framework. J Clean Prod. 214:112–124. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.268.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian KS, Santhanakrishnan P, Balasubramanian P. 2006. Responses of field grown tomato plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization under varying intensities of drought stress. Sci Hortic. 107(3):245–253. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2005.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 1999. Soil taxonomy. 2nd ed. In: Staff SS, editor. Washington (DC): USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari FP, Maienza A, Miglietta F, Baronti S, Di Lonardo S, Giagnoni L, Lagomarsino A, Pozzi A, Pusceddu E, Ranieri R, et al. 2015. Biochar stimulates plant growth but not fruit yield of processing tomato in a fertile soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 207:163–170. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Ortiz R, Carrillo-Rodríguez JC, Ramírez-Vallejo P. 2010. Evaluación morfo-agronómica de una muestra del jitomate nativo del Centro y Sureste de México. Nat y Desarro. 8(2):49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang Y, Mao J, Chen B. 2020. Effects of biochar nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth. Environ Pollut. 256:113409. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar