Enzyme activities and heavy metal interactions in calcareous soils under different land uses

References

• Allison LE, Moodie CE. 1958. Carbonate. In: Black, CA, editor. Metods of soils analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9. Madison, Wisconson: American Society of Argonomy. p. 1379–1400.
   Google Scholar
• Aponte H, Meli P, Butler B, Paolini J, Matus F, Merino C, Cornejo P, Kuzyakov Y. 2020. Meta-analysis of heavy metal effects on soil enzyme activities. Sci Total Environ. 737:139744. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouzi R, Charef A, Hamzaoui AH. 2015. Assessment of effect of pH, temperature and organic matter on zinc mobility in a hydromorphic soil. Environ Earth Sci. 74(4):2967–2980. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4328-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethgen WE, Alley MM. 1989. A manual colorimetric procedure for measuring ammonium nitrogen in soil and plant Kjeldahl digests. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 20(9–10):961–969. doi: 10.1080/00103628909368129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouyoucos GJ. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. J Agron. 43(9):434–438. doi: 10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090005x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner JM. 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part II. Chemical and microbiological properties. In: Black, CA, editor. Metods of soils analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9. Madison, Wisconson: American Society of Argonomy. p. 1379–1400.
   Google Scholar
• Bro R, Smilde AK. 2014. Principal component analysis. Anal Methods. 6(9):2812–2831. doi: 10.1039/C3AY41907J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YP, Liu Q, Liu YJ, Jia FA, He XH. 2014. Responses of soil microbial activity to cadmium pollution and elevated CO2. Sci Rep. 4(1):4287. doi: 10.1038/srep04287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen X, Chen HY, Searle EB, Chen C, Reich PB. 2020. Negative to positive shifts in diversity effects on soil nitrogen over time. Nat Sustain. 4(3):225–232. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00641-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick WA. 2011. Development of a soil enzyme reaction assay. In: Dick RP, editor. Methods of soil enzymology. SSSA Book Series No. 9. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America. p. 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Enya O, Heaney N, Iniama G, Lin C. 2020. Effects of heavy metals on organic matter decomposition in inundated soils: microcosm experiment and field examination. Sci Total Environ. 724:138223. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Cao X, Zhao L. 2012. Effects of phosphorus amendments and plant growth on the mobility of Pb, Cu, and Zn in a multi-metal-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 19(5):1659–1667. doi: 10.1007/s11356-011-0674-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florea AM, Büsselberg D. 2006. Occurrence, use and potential toxic effects of metals and metal compounds. Biometals. 19(4):419–427. doi: 10.1007/s10534-005-4451-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ. 1977. Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity. Microb Ecol. 4(4):303–317. doi: 10.1007/BF02013274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau G, Porceddu A, Sanna M, Silvetti M, Castaldi P. 2019. Municipal solid wastes as a resource for environmental recovery: ımpact of water treatment residuals and compost on the microbial and biochemical features of As and trace metal-polluted soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 174:445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Sotres F, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leiro MC, Seoane S. 2005. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biol Biochem. 37(5):877–887. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanumanth Kumar G, Pramoda Kumari J. 2015. Heavy metal lead influative toxicity and its assessment in phytoremediating plants—a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 226(10):324–335. doi: 10.1007/s11270-015-2547-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke PA, Sparks DL. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidiumand calcium. In: Sparks DL, editors. Methods of soil analysis part 3 chemical methods. SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America. p. 551–574.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa MB, Carreira JA, García-Ruíz R, Dick RP. 2004. Soil moisture pre-treatment effects on enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal-contaminated and reclaimed soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 36(10):1559–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson GL, Viets FG. 1969. Nitrogen enrichment of surface water by absorption of ammonia volatilized from cattle feedlots. Science. 166(3904):514–515. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3904.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUSS. 2014. World reference base for soil resources 2014: International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: FAO. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson MC. 1962. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubus M, Graczyk M. 2020. Microelement variability in plants as an effect of sewage sludge compost application assessed by different statistical methods. Agron. 10(5):642. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10050642.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworska H, Lemanowicz J. 2019. Heavy metal contents and enzymatic activity in soils exposed to the impact of road traffic. Sci Rep. 9(1):19981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56418-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson JL, Temple KL. 1964. Some variables affecting the measurement of catalase activit in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 28(2):207–209. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800020024x.
   Google Scholar
• Kloke A. 1979. Contents of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, fluorine, lead, mercury and nickel in plants grown on contaminated soil. Paper Presented at United Nations-ECE Symp, on Effect of Air-Borne. Polltion on Vegetation, Warsaw, August 20. p. 192.
   Google Scholar
• Kunito T, Saeki K, Goto S, Hayashi H, Oyaizu H, Matsumoto S. 2001. Copper and zinc fractions affecting microorganisms in long-term sludge-amended soils. Bioresour Technol. 79(2):135–146. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00047-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le S, Josse J, Husson F. 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Soft. 25(1):1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 42(3):421–428. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Yang YS, Xu GD, Fang YH, Yang YA, Kalin RM. 2005. The effect of molybdenum and boron in soil on the growth and photosynthesis of three soybean varieties. Plant Soil Environ. 51(5):197–205. doi: 10.17221/3574-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee CF, Storey S, Clipson N, Doyle E. 2017. Soil microbial community responses to contamination with silver, aluminium oxide and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology. 26(3):449–458. doi: 10.1007/s10646-017-1776-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno JL, Bastida F, Díaz-López M, Li Y, Zhou Y, López-Mondéjar R, Benavente-Ferraces I, Rojas R, Rey A, Carlos García-Gil J, et al. 2022. Response of soil chemical properties, enzyme activities and microbial communities to biochar application and climate change in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Geoderma. 407:115536. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno JL, Sanchez-Marín A, Hernández T, García C. 2006. Effect of cadmium on microbial activity and a ryegrass crop in two semiarid soils. Environ Manage. 37(5):626–633. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-5006-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulugeta T, Abreha K, Tekie H, Mulatu B, Yesuf M, Andreasson E, Liljeroth E, Alexandersson E. 2019. Phosphite protects against potato and tomato late blight in tropical climates and has varying toxicity depending on the phytophthora infestans isolate. Crop Prot. 121:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nannipieri P. 1994. The potential use of soil enzymes as ındicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution, soil biota management in sustainable farming systems. In: Pankhurst CE, Double BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR, editors. Soil biota. Management in sustainable farming systems. East Melbourne: CSIRO. p. 238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Nivelle E, Verzeaux J, Habbib H, Kuzyakov Y, Decocq G, Roger D, Lacoux J, Duclercq J, Spicher F, Nava-Saucedo JE, et al. 2016. Functional response of soil microbial communities to tillage, cover crops and nitrogen fertilization. Appl Soil Ecol. 108:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NJDEP. 1996. Soil cleanup criteria, New Jersey department of environmental protection, proposed cleanup standards for contaminated sites. NJAC. 7:26D.
   Google Scholar
• Page AL. 1974. Fate and effects of trace elements in sewage sludge when applied to agricultural lands. In: Sewage sludge when applied to agricultural land: a literature review. Cincinnati, Ohio: Environmental Protection Agency. p. 96.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual JA, García C, Hernandez T. 1999. Lasting microbiological and biochemical effects of the addition of municipal solid waste to an arid soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 30(1–2):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s003740050579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Espinosa A, Moreno-Caselles J, Moral R, Perez-Murcia MD, Gomez I. 2002. Effect of increased cobalt treatments on sewage sludge amended soil: nitrogen species in soil and transference to tomato plants. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 48(3):273–278. doi: 10.1080/03650340213839.
   Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Tang J, Liu B, Lyu H, Duan Y, Yang Y, Wang S, Li Z. 2022. Rhizosphere enzyme activities and microorganisms drive the transformation of organic and inorganic carbon in saline–alkali soil region. Sci Rep. 12(1):1314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05218-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1954. Diagnosis and ımprovement of salina and alkalina soils: Handbook 60. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture. p. 105.
   Google Scholar
• Sakin E, Ramazanoglu E, Seyrek A. 2021. Effects of different biochar amendments on soil enzyme activities and carbondioxide emission. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 52(22):2933–2944. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1971694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakin E, Yanardag IH, Yalcin H. 2021. Appraisal of the black carbon in soils of Harran plain, Turkey. Range Manag Agrofor. 42(2):262–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Mitra S, Majumdar D, Bhattacharyya P, Prakash A, Borah P, Paul A, Rangan L. 2017. Nutrient and enzyme mobilization in earthworm casts: a comparative study with addition of selective amendments in undisturbed and agricultural soils of a mountain ecosystem. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 119:437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha MK, Dhillon SK, Dhillon KS, Dyanand S. 1978. Solubility relationship of iron, manganese, copper, and zinc in alkaline and calcareous soils. Soil Res. 16(1):19–26. doi: 10.1071/SR9780019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparling GP, West AW. 1988. A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C: calibration in situ using microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells. Soil Biol Biochem. 20(3):337–343. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(88)90014-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speratti AB, Johnson MS, Sousa HM, Dalmagro HJ, Couto EG. 2018. Biochar feedstock and pyrolysis temperature effects on leachate: DOC characteristics and nitrate losses from a Brazilian Cerrado Arenosol mixed with agricultural waste biochars. J Environ Manage. 211:256–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinweg JM, Kostka JE, Hanson PJ, Schadt CW. 2018. Temperature sensitivity of extracellular enzymes differs with peat depth but not with season in an ombrotrophic bog. Soil Biol Biochem. 125:244–250. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Wang YP, Wang ZY, Liu P, Xu GD. 2013. The effects of molybdenum and boron on the rhizosphere microorganisms and soil enzyme activities of soybean. Acta Physiol Plant. 35(3):763–770. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1116-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolnoki Z, Farsang A. 2013. Evaluation of metal mobility and bioaccessibility in soils of urban vegetable gardens using sequential extraction. Water Air Soil Pollut. 224(10):1737–1753. doi: 10.1007/s11270-013-1737-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. 1972. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 4(4):479–487. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA. 1994. Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angel JS., Bottomley PS, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2—microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America. p. 775–833.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Ren L, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Luo L, Yang Y, Huang H, Chen A. 2020. Physicochemical features, metal availability and enzyme activity in heavy metal-polluted soil remediated by biochar and compost. Sci Total Environ. 701:134751. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietjen T, Wetzel RG. 2003. Extracellular enzyme-clay mineral complexes: enzyme adsorption, alteration of enzyme activity, and protection from photodegradation. Aquat Ecol. 37(4):331–339. doi: 10.1023/B:AECO.0000007044.52801.6b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 19(6):703–707. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanardağ IH, Zornoza R, Bastida F, Büyükkiliç-Yanardağ A, García C, Faz A, Mermut AR. 2017. Native soil organic matter conditions the response of microbial communities to organic inputs with different stability. Geoderma. 295:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanardağ İH, Zornoza RAUL, Cano AF, Yanardağ AB, Mermut AR. 2015. Evaluation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in different soil types amended with pig slurry, pig manure and its biochar by chemical and thermogravimetric analysis. Biol Fertil Soils. 51(2):183–196. doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0962-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Liu J, McGrouther K, Huang H, Lu K, Guo X, He L, Lin X, Che L, Ye Z, et al. 2016. Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 23(2):974–984. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4233-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JE, Kim JJ, Skogley EO, Schaff BE. 1998. A Simple Spectrophotometric Determination of Nitrate in Water, Resin, and Soil Extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 62(4):1108–1115. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040036x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang ZX, Liu SQ, Zheng DW, Feng SD. 2006. Effects of cadium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci (China). 18(6):1135–1141. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60051-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaborowska M, Kucharski J, Wyszkowska J. 2016. Biological activity of soil contaminated with cobalt, tin, and molybdenum. Environ Monit Assess. 188(7):398. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5399-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar