Multi-actor collaboration in platform-based ecosystem: opportunities and challenges

References

• Baldwin, C., & Woodard, J. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation. In A. Gawer (ed.), The architecture of platforms: A unified view (pp. 19–44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2006). Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems. In D. B. A. Minai & Y. B. Yam (Eds.), Complex engineered systems (pp. 175–205). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Basole, R. C., & Karla, J. (2011). On the evolution of mobile platform ecosystem structure and strategy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(5), 313–322. doi:10.1007/s12599-011-0174-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163–191). Chel-tenham, UK and Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cabigiosu, A., Zirpoli, F., & Camuffo, A. (2013). Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry. Research Policy, 42(3), 662–675. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, D., & Camuffo, A. (2009). What really drives the adoption of modular organizational forms? An institutional perspective from Italian industry-level data. Industry and Innovation, 16(3), 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19–36. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. (2010). Technology strategy and management the evolution of platform thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 32–34. doi:10.1145/1629175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. (1993). A multiple paradigm approach to organizational control. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1(4), 385–403. doi:10.1108/eb028797
   Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2012). Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 347–354. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2017). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 1–12. doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2011). Structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: The cases of the Apple and Google Mobile App stores. Working paper series of the Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science (183).
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–243. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 45, 57.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 1–34. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2010). Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (pp. 1–18). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
   Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2012). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbach, T., & Kemper, V. (2014), “Should I Stay Or Should I Go? The Effects of Control Mechanisms On App Developers´ intention to stick with a platform, In Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS, 2014), Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
   Google Scholar
• Hoehle, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Mobile application usability: Conceptualization and instrument development. Mis Quarterly, 39(2). doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004a). Creating value in your business ecosystem. Harvrad Business Review, 3, 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004b). The Keystone Advantage: What new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. H. (2011). Managing university technology development using organizational control theory. Research Policy, 40(6), 842–852. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L. S. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS Project Management. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 215–239. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(1), 19. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. A. (1985). Control in business organizations. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: The new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H., & Jaiswal, M. (2015). Portfolios of control in mobile eco-systems: Evolution and validation. Info, 17(2), 36–58. doi:10.1108/info-11-2014-0043
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., de Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2016a). Effectiveness of control mechanisms in mobile platform ecosystem. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 848–859. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2016b). Why controls are used in platform ecosystems?: An analytic hierarchy process approach to rank roles of control mechanisms in platform ecosystems. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), 8(3), 1–19. doi:10.4018/IJESMA
   Google Scholar
• Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: A case study of mobile payment platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 260–275. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, K., Lin, Y., Shi, Y., & Yu, J. (2013). Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: A triple view of technology, application and organisation. International Journal of Technology Management, 62(1), 75–94. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2013.053042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266–281. doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary —platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkokari, K., Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., & Jylhä-Ollila, S. (2017). Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: A qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(3). doi:10.22215/timreview1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, M., Thies, F., & Benlian, A. (2015). The effects of relinquishing control in platform ecosystems: Implications from a policy change on Kickstarter. Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth 2015/ International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015), Fort Worth, TX.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259–1285. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Liang, X. (2011). Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: The case of China Mobile. Telecommunications Policy, 35(2), 156–171. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar