Figayou pursues a platform strategy: a case study of digital platform entrepreneurship

References

• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 369–386. doi:10.2307/248684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, A., Harreld, J. B., O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2014). The art of strategic renewal. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761–1777. doi:10.1002/smj.2324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cearley, D. W., Burke, B., Searle, S., & Walker, M. J. (2017, October 3). Top 10 strategic technology trends for 2018. Gartner. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154. doi:10.1177/014920639101700109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantiou, I., Eaton, B., & Tuunainen, V. K. (2016, January). The evolution of a sharing platform into a sustainable business. System Sciences (HICSS), 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1297–1306). Koloa, HI: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. (2010). Technology strategy and management the evolution of platform thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 32–34. doi:10.1145/1629175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., & Dayal, M. (2016). Exploring determinants of cloud-based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) selection and adoption: A qualitative study in the Indian education sector. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 18(1), 11–36. doi:10.1080/15228053.2016.1160733
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. L. (1994). Raising radicals: Different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organization Science, 5(2), 148–172. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2016). Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies. California Management Review, 58(4), 59–77. doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, A., Garbuio, M., & Lovallo, D. (2016). Generative sensing: A design perspective on the microfoundations of sensing capabilities. California Management Review, 58(4), 97–117. doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27, 597–636. doi:10.2307/30036550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. C., & Basole, R. C. (2016). Revealing the API ecosystem and enterprise strategy via visual analytics. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 26–28. doi:10.1145/2886013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. (2008). The case for case-based research. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 10(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/15228053.2008.10856126
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1991, Spring). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33, 114–135. doi:10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2014). Digital ubiquity: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., Khan, M. K., Wu, F., Chen, G., & Zeng, P. (2017). Millimeter-wave wireless communications for IoT-cloud supported autonomous vehicles: Overview, design, and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(1), 62–68. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600422CM
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuderer, M., Gulati, S., & Burgard, W. (2015, May). Learning driving styles for autonomous vehicles from demonstration. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 2641–2646). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. R., Iansiti, M., & Herman, K. (2014, April). GE and the industrial internet (Harvard Business School Case 614-032). ( Revised March 2015). Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., & Penard, T. (2014). The role of quantitative and qualitative network effects in B2B platform competition. Managerial & Decision Economics, 35(1), 1–19. doi:10.1002/mde.2602
   Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. doi:10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocker, M., & Fonstad, N. O. (2017). How AUDI AG is driving toward the sharing economy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(4), 279–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, F. and World Economic Forum (2016, January 19). The 7 technologies changing your world. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/a-brief-guide-to-the-technologies-changing-world
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., de Reuver, M., & Bouwman, H. (2016). Effectiveness of control mechanisms in mobile platform ecosystem. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 848–859. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy— And how to make them work for you. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryall, M. D. (2013). The new dynamics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239–253. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., Lindgren, R., & Kane, G. C. (2017). Mastering the digital innovation challenge. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(3), 14–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (Digital) platform lifecycles. In J. Furman, A. Gawer, B. S. Silverman, & S. Stern (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms (Advances in strategic management (Vol. 37, pp. 211–225). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velu, C., & Stiles, P. (2013). Managing decision-making and cannibalization for parallel business models. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 443–458. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdin, P., & Tackx, K. (2015). Are you creating or capturing value? A dynamic framework for sustainable strategy. Working Papers Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Furr, N. (2016). Products to platforms: Making the leap. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar