Approaches to welfare technology in municipal eldercare

References

• Andreassen, H. K., Kjekshus, L. E., & Tjora, A. (2015). Survival of the project: A case study of ICT innovation in health care. Social Science & Medicine, 132, 62–69. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anell, A., Glenngard, A. H., & Merkur, S. M. (2012). Sweden: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 14(5), 1–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atroshi, G. (2015). Velferdsteknologi fra planer til prosjekt”: en kvalitativ studie av domestisering av velferdsteknologi. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Baškarada, S.(2014). Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. (2001). Implementing information systems in health care organisations: Myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(2-3), 143–156. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00200-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg, S. (2008). The specialisation of needs-assessment in Swedish municipal care for older people: The diffusion of a new organisational model: Specialiserad biståndshandläggning inom den kommunala äldreomsorgen i Sverige–spridningen av en ny organisationsmodell. European Journal of Social Work, 11(4), 415–429. doi:10.1080/13691450802075634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozza, M. (2018). Interoperability and convergence for welfare technology. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, Las vegas, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Cozza, M., Crevani, L., Hallin, A., & Schaeffer, J. (2019). Future ageing: Welfare technology practices for our future older selves. Futures, 109, 117–129. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K., & DeWalt, B. (2010). Writing field notes. Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 138–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ertner, M. (2019). Enchanting, Evoking, and Affecting: The Invisible Work of Technology Implementation in Homecare. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(S5), 33-47. doi:10.18291/njwls.v9iS5.112690
   Google Scholar
• Essén, A., & Lindblad, S. (2013). Innovation as emergence in healthcare: Unpacking change from within. Social Science & Medicine, 93, 203–211. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert, S., & Östlund, B. (2018). Narrative Review: Technologies in Eldercare. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 21–34. doi:10.5324/njsts.v6i1.2518
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (Vol. 30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gurwitz, J. H., & Pearson, S. D. (2019). Novel therapies for an aging population: Grappling with price, value, and affordability. Jama, 321(16), 1567–1568. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.2633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. (2011). Innovasjon i omsorg [Innovations in Care]. In: H.-O. omsorgsdepartementet, Editor.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S., Lotherington, A. T., Obstfelder, A., & Dyb, K. (2010). Getting the whole picture? New information and communication technologies in healthcare work and organisation. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 442–465. doi:10.1080/13691180903095856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouncefield, M., & Sharpe, M. (2000). Being there and doing IT in the workplace: A case study of a co-development approach in healthcare. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the CPSR/IFIP WG 9.1 participatory design conference.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, S., & Winther Wehner, L. (2012). Etik och välfärdsteknologi [Ethics and welfare technology]. Nordens Välfärdscenter. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B. (2013). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: A review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 389–406. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9348-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, M., & Yamada, T. (2019). Population aging, health care, and fiscal policy reform: The challenges for Japan. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(2), 547–577. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp, A., & Hansen, A. M. (2019). Negotiating professional knowledge and responsibility in cross-sectoral telemedicine. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(S5), 13-30. doi:10.18291/njwls.v9iS5.112691
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, A., Obstfelder, A., & Andersson, K. (2019). Welfare technologies in care work. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(S5), 1–12. doi:10.18291/njwls.v9iS5.112692
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. (1996). Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keasberry, J., Scott, I. A., Sullivan, C., Staib, A., & Ashby, R. (2018). Going digital: A narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice. Australian Health Review, 41(6), 646–664. doi:10.1071/AH16233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibler, E., Salmivaara, V., Stenholm, P., & Terjesen, S. (2018). The evaluative legitimacy of social entrepreneurship in capitalist welfare systems. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 944–957. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkowska, E., Nöu, A. A., Sjölinder, M., & Scandurra, I. (2017). To capture the diverse needs of welfare technology stakeholders–evaluation of a value matrix. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S.-T., Fang, C. M.-S., & Lou, V. W. (2017). Organisational capacities for ‘residential care homes for the elderly’to provide culturally appropriate end-of-life care for Chinese elders and their families. Journal of Aging Studies, 40, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2016.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Woods, O. (2018). Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins. Journal of Aging Studies, 47, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. S., & Beane, A. (2018). Health information technology continues to show positive effect on medical outcomes: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e41. doi:10.2196/jmir.8793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurell, H. (2018). An international new venture’s commercialization of a medical technology innovation: The role of institutional healthcare settings. International Marketing Review, 35(1), 136–163. doi:10.1108/IMR-04-2015-0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Terjesen, S., & Umans, T. (2020). Corporate governance in entrepreneurial firms: A systematic review and research agenda. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 43–32. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C., Waldahl, R. H., & Antonsen, Y. (2019). Tverrfaglig, sammenkoblet og allestedsnaervaerende–om implementering av velferdsteknologi i kommunale helse-og omsorgstjenester. Nordisk välfärdsforskning| Nordic Welfare Research, 4(01), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• May, C. R., Finch, T. L., Cornford, J., Exley, C., Gately, C., Kirk, S., … Rogers, A. (2011). Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done? BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 131. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., & Szebehely, M. (2013). Marketisation in Nordic eldercare:: A research report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequen. Department of social work. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Modig, A. (2012). Välfärdsteknologi inom äldreomsorgen: en kartläggning av samtliga Sveriges kommuner [Welfare Technology in Eldercare: A screening of all Swedish Municipalities]. Sweden: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (vol. 8, pp. 7–27). Amsterdam: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2015). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (Vol. 8). Amsterdam: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E., Treweek, S., Pope, C., MacFarlane, A., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., … O’Donnell, C. (2010). Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Medicine, 8(1), 63. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neven, L. (2010). But obviously not for me’: Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 335–347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, E. R., Dugstad, J., Eide, H., Gullslett, M. K., & Eide, T. (2016). Exploring resistance to implementation of welfare technology in municipal healthcare services–a longitudinal case study. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 657. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1913-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palme, J. (2017). The Swedish welfare state system. In The Routledge international handbook to welfare state systems (vol. 203). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, J. (2011). Wonderful webcams: About active gazes and invisible technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(4), 451–473. doi:10.1177/0162243910366134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols, J. (2017). Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care. Nursing Philosophy, 18(1), e12154. doi:10.1111/nup.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, D., Busch-Casler, J., Haberstroh, M. M., & Pinkwart, A. (2019). National health innovation systems: Clustering the OECD countries by innovative output in healthcare using a multi indicator approach. Research Policy, 48(1), 169–179. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, J. J., Segundo, D. B. D. R., Junqueira, H. A., Sabino, M. H., Prince, R. M., Al-Muhtadi, J., & De Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2018). Enabling technologies for the internet of health things. Ieee Access., 6, 13129–13141. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2789329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydenfält, C., Persson, J., Erlingsdottir, G., & Johansson, G. (2019). eHealth services in the near and distant future in Swedish home care nursing. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(7), 366–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Criado, T., López, D., Roberts, C., & Domènech, M. (2014). Installing telecare, installing users: Felicity conditions for the instauration of usership. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(5), 694–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage publication.
   Google Scholar
• Sipilä, J. (1997). Social care services: the key to the Scandinavian welfare model. London: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, P.-O., Olsson, S., & Larsen, C. P. (2014). Lägesrapport om välfärdsteknik till Socialstyrelsen. Retrieved from https://www.sics.se/sites/default/files/pub/sics_till_socialstyrelsen_lagesrapport_valfardsteknik.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Song, I.-Y., Song, M., Timakum, T., Ryu, S.-R., & Lee, H. (2018). The landscape of smart aging: Topics, applications, and agenda. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 115, 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M., Stranz, A., & Strandell, R. (2017). Vem ska arbeta i framtidens äldreomsorg?
   Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G. B. (2012). Home care for older people in Sweden: A universal model in transition. Health & Social Care in the Community, 20(3), 300–309. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trencher, G., & Karvonen, A. (2019). Stretching “smart”: Advancing health and well-being through the smart city agenda. Local Environment, 24(7), 610–627.
   Google Scholar
• Tchouaket, É. N., Lamarche, P. A., Goulet, L., & Contandriopoulos, A. P. (2012). Health care system performance of 27 OECD countries. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 27(2), 104–129. doi:10.1002/hpm.1110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter, F., Xheneti, M., & Smallbone, D. (2018). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness in unstable institutional contexts: T he example of E uropean U nion borderlands. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 23–53. doi:10.1002/sej.1274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickström, G., Regner, Å., & Micko, L. (2017). Vision eHealth 2025 – Common starting points for digitization in social services and health and medical care. Stockholm
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, V., Johansson-Pajala, R.-M., & Gustafsson, C. (2019). Methods to evaluate perspectives of safety, independence, activity, and participation in older persons using welfare technology. A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15, 1–21. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1574919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., Schmidt, D. C., White, J., & Lenz, G. (2018). Blockchain technology use cases in healthcare. In Advances in computers (Vol. 111, pp. 1–41). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Øderud, T., Ausen, D., Aketun, S., & Thorgersen, M. (2017). GPS for trygghet, frihet og mestring. Fra prosjekt til drift-Bruk av GPS for lokalisering av personer med demens/kognitiv svikt. Sintef Rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Östlund, B., Olander, E., Jonsson, O., & Frennert, S. (2015). STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar