301
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A Text Messaging Intervention to Increase Engagement and Retention of Men in a Community-Based Father Involvement Program

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 144-162 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 20 Oct 2020, Published online: 05 Nov 2020

References

  • Avellar, S., Covington, R., Moor, Q., Patnaik, A., & Wu, A. (2019). Effects of four responsible fatherhood programs for low-income fathers: Evidence from the Parents and Children Together evaluation (OPRE Report Number 2019-05). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Balu, R., Lee, S., & Steimle, S. (2018). Encouraging attendance and engagement in parenting programs: Developing a smartphone application with fathers, for fathers (OPRE Report 2018-68). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391–409.
  • Boulos, M. N. K., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., & Jones, R. (2011). How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: An overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomedical Engineering Online, 10(1), 24–37. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-10-24.
  • Breyette, S. K., & Hill, K. (2015). The impact of electronic communication and social media on child welfare practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(4), 283–303. doi:10.1080/15228835.2015.1101408
  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dion, M. R., Zaveri, H., & Holcomb, P. (2015). Responsible fatherhood programs in the parents and children together (pact) evaluation. Family Court Review, 53(2), 292–303. doi:10.1111/fcre.12140
  • Fagan, J., & Pearson, J. (2020). Fathers’ dosage in community-based programs for low-income fathers. Family Process, 59(1), 81–93. doi:10.11/famp.12416
  • Frank, T., Keown, L., Dittman, C., & Sanders, M. (2015). Using father preference data to increase father engagement in evidence-based parenting programs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(4), 937–947. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-9904-9
  • Frank, T., Keown, L. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Enhancing father engagement and interparental teamwork in an evidence-based parenting intervention: A randomized-controlled trial of outcomes and processes. Behavior Therapy, 46(6), 749–763. 715 p. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.008
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Holmes, E., Hawkins, A., Egginton, B., Robbins, N., & Shafer, K. (2018). Do responsible fatherhood programs work? A comprehensive meta-analytic study. Fatherhood Research & Practice Network. Available online at: https://www.frpn.org/asset/frpn-grantee-report-do-responsible-fatherhood-programs-work-comprehensive-meta-analytic-study.
  • Icard, L. D., Zamora-Hernandez, C. E., Spencer, M. S., & Catalano, R. (1996). Designing and evaluating strategies to recruit African Americans for AIDS/HIV interventions: Targeting the African-American family. Ethnicity & Disease, 6(3-4), 301–310.
  • Ingoldsby, E. M., Baca, P., McClatchey, M. W., Luckey, D. W., Ramsey, M. O., Loch, J. M., … Olds, D. L. (2013). Quasi-experimental pilot study of intervention to increase participant retention and completed home visits in the nurse-family partnership. Prevention Science, 14(6), 525–534. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0410-x
  • Jones, H. E., Haug, N., Silverman, K., Stitzer, M., & Svikis, D. (2001). The effectiveness of incentives in enhancing treatment attendance and drug abstinence in methadone-maintained pregnant women. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 61(3), 297–306.
  • Klasnja, P., & Pratt, W. (2012). Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the pace of mobile-phone interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(1), 184–198. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017
  • Murray, C. E., Pow, A. M., Chow, A., Nemati, H., & White, J. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ needs and perceptions of technology: A qualitative study. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(2), 133–155. doi:10.1080/15228835.2014.1000558
  • Pruett, M. K., Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Pruett, K. (2009). Lessons learned from the supporting father involvement study: A cross-cultural preventive intervention for low-income families with young children. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(2), 163–179. doi:10.1080/01488370802678942
  • Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., & Eagle, N. (2009). Smartphones an emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 426–454.
  • Sugie, N. F. (2018). Utilizing Smartphones to Study Disadvantaged and Hard-to-Reach Groups. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 458–491. doi:10.1177/0024115626176
  • Tarzia, L., Iyer, D., Thrower, E., & Hegarty, K. (2017). "Technology doesn’t judge you”: Young Australian women’s views on using the internet and smartphones to address intimate partner violence. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(3), 199–218. doi:10.1080/15228835.2017.1350616
  • Tollestrup, J. (2018). Fatherhood Initiatives: Connecting fathers to their children (CRS Report Number RL31025). Congressional Research Services. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL31025.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS): Health Resources and Services Administration. (2014). Using health text messages to improve consumer health knowledge, behaviors, and outcomes: An environmental scan. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration.
  • Yatchmenoff, D. K. (2005). Measuring client engagement from the client's perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 84–96.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.