130
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Imagination, Embodied Experiences, and Meaning in Supervision

References

  • Aron, L. (2003). Clinical outbursts and theoretical breakthroughs: A unifying theme in the work of Stephen A. Mitchell. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348732
  • Auchincloss, E. L., & Samberg, E. (2012). Psychoanalytic terms and concepts. American Psychoanalytic Association and the Yale University Press.
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x
  • Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. Tavistock.
  • Boulanger, G. (2018). When is vicarious trauma a necessary therapeutic tool? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 35(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000089
  • Bromberg, P. M. (2003). On being one’s dream: Some reflections on Robert Bosnak’s “embodied imagination”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39(4), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2003.10747229
  • Butler, J. (2000). Longing for recognition: Commentary on the work of Jessica Benjamin. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 1(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240650109349159
  • Cabaniss, D. L., Glick, R. A., & Roose, S. P. (2001). The Columbia Supervision Project: Data from the dyad. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49(1), 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651010490010501
  • Carrere, R. A. (2008). Reflections on psychoanalysis conducted as a talking cure. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 44(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2008.10745965
  • Ceccoli, V. C. (2021). Dancing with the shadow of the object: Tango as a means of embodied symbolization– Commentary of Dawn Farber’s “psychoanalysis and tango: Complex arts of grief therapy”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 31(5), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2021.1956839
  • Celenza, A. (2020). Embodiment and the perversion of desire. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 89(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.2020.1766933
  • Corradi Fiumara, G. (2009). Spontaneity: A psychoanalytic inquiry. Routledge.
  • Eigen, M. (2012). On Winnicott’s clinical innovations in the analysis of adults. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 93(6), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12018
  • Eshel, O. (2013). Patient-analyst “withness”: On analytic “presencing,” passion, and compassion in states of breakdown, despair, and deadness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 82(4), 925–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2013.00065.x
  • Ferro, A. (2012). Creativity in the consulting room: Factors of fertility and infertility. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2011.609059
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348739
  • Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(5), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481880903231910
  • Gallese, V. (2011). Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and narrative. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13(2), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2011.10773675
  • Goldberg, P. (2020). Body-mind dissociation, altered states, and alter worlds. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68(5), 769–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120968422
  • Harrison, A. M., & Tronick, E. (2022). Thoughts on developmental and psychoanalytic change inspired by Heinz Hartmann. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2022.2047374
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press.
  • Hinshelwood, R. D. (2020). The function of symbol-formation: Pinning down the ego function. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 36(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12519
  • Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Neurobiological correlates of object relations theory: The relationship between neurobiological and psychodynamic development. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 24(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2014.912352
  • Langer, S. (1942). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Harvard University Press.
  • Lemma, A. (2014). The body of the analyst and the analytic setting: Reflections on the embodied setting and the symbiotic transference. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 95(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12147
  • Levine, H. B. (2012). The colorless canvas: Representation, therapeutic action and the creation of mind. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 93(3), 607–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00574.x
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (2006). Play, precariousness, and the negotiation of shared meaning: A developmental research perspective on child psychotherapy. Journal of Infant Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 5, 142–159.
  • Markman, H. C. (2020). Embodied attunement and participation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68(5), 807–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120969413
  • Michelman, S. (2010). The A to Z of existentialism. Scarecrow Press.
  • Mills, J. (2021). Dialectics and developmental trauma: How toxic introjects affect attachment. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 28(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228878.2021.1943468
  • Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. The Analytic Press.
  • Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00156.x
  • Ogden, T. H. (2015). Intuiting the truth of what’s happening: On Bion’s “notes on memory and desire”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 84(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/psaq.12000
  • Ogden, T. H. (2019). Ontological psychoanalysis or “what do you want to be when you grow up?”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 88(4), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.2019.1656928
  • Oliveira Moreira, J., Bucciano do Rosario, A., & Fuad Kyrillos, N. (2023). The objectification of mankind in consumerist societies: A post-Lacanian perspective. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 32, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2023.2174271
  • Orange, D. M. (2010). Recognition as: Intersubjective vulnerability in the psychoanalytic dialogue. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 5(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2010.491719
  • Preston, L. (2008). The edge of awareness: Gendlin’s contribution to explorations of implicit experience. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 3(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551020802337419
  • Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of being, phenomenology, psychiatry, and the sense of reality. Oxford University Press.
  • Sapountzis, I., Wainstein, J., Pereira, J., Vaughans, K., Daisy-Etienne, N., & Jones, Y. (2022). Using the weaving thoughts peer supervision method to generate a nested mentalization frame: The DHCC experience. Journal of Infant, Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 21(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2022.2138690
  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2016). Strangers, trust, and religion: On the vulnerability of being. Human Studies, 39(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9367-z
  • Sletvold, J. (2016). The analyst’s body: A relational perspective from the body. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 13(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2016.1156433
  • Slochower, J. (2017). Going too far: Relational heroines and relational excess. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 27(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2017.1308205
  • Stern, D. B. (2013). Relational freedom and therapeutic action. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065113484060
  • Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., & Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79 (Pt 5), 903–921.
  • Van Der Kolk, B. (2015). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1962). Communication between individuals examined with reference to the development of a capacity for communication in the individual infant. Presentation given at the Scientific Meeting of the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, October 8, 1962. Collected Works of D.W. Winnicott, 12. https://academic.oup.com/book/12894/chapter/329240268
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965/1989). The psychology of madness: A contribution from psychoanalysis. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations. Harvard University Press.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965a). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. Hogarth.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965b). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. International Psycho-Analytic Library, 64, 179–192.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). The use of an object and relating through identifications. In Playing and reality (pp. 86–94). Basic Books.
  • Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. MIT Press.
  • Zeddies, T. J. (2001). Out of the consulting room and into the world: Hermeneutic dialogue, phronesis, and psychoanalytic theory as practice. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 61(3), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010225301066
  • Zwiebel, R. (2007). Von der angst, psychoanalytiker zu sein. Das durcharbeiten der phobischen position [About the fear of being a psychoanalyst. Working through the phobic position]. Klett-Cotta.