Understanding Perceptions of Hypnotically Recovered Memories in a Civil Sexual Abuse Case

REFERENCES

• Bornstein , B. H. and Muller , S. L. 2001 . The credibility of recovered memory testimony: Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender . Child Abuse & Neglect , 25 : 1415 – 1426 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements , C. B. , Brannen , D. N. , Kirkley , S. M. , Gordon , T. M. and Church , W. T. 2006 . The measurement of concern about victims: Empathy, victim advocacy and the Victim Concern Scale (VCS) . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 11 : 283 – 295 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman , B. L. , Stevens , M. J. and Reeder , G. D. 2001 . What makes recovered-memory testimony compelling to jurors? . Law and Human Behavior , 25 : 317 – 338 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwick , E. 1995 . Hypnotically recalled testimony: Issues facing courts in their determination of its admissibility in civil sexual abuse cases . Law and Psychology Review , 19 : 183 – 201 .
   Google Scholar
• Couch , J. V. and Sigler , J. N. 2002 . Gender of an expert witness and the jury verdict . The Psychological Record , 52 : 281 – 287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubreuil , S. 1995 . Courtroom preparation of hypnotic and non-hypnotic eyewitnesses; Jurors' perceptions of witness testimony and the impact of expert testimony . Dissertation Abstracts International, B, The Sciences and Engineering , 55 : 5600
   Google Scholar
• FosterLee , R. , Horowitz , I. A. , Ho , R. , FosterLee , L. and McGovern , A. 1999 . Community members' perceptions of evidence: The effects of gender in a recovered memory civil trial . Journal of Applied Psychology , 84 : 484 – 495 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, L. R. (2006). Repressed memory evidence in civil sexual abuse cases. bepress Legal Series. Working Paper 1181 http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1181 (http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1181)
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein , A. M. 2007 . Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles , Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Griffith , J. D. , Libkuman , T. M. and Poole , D. A. 1998 . Repressed memories: The effects of expert testimony on mock jurors' decision making . American Journal of Forensic Psychology , 16 : 5 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Harding v. State, 246 A.2d 302, 306 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Knight , S. C. 2005 . Beliefs toward forensic hypnosis: An expert sample versus an undergraduate sample with an educational lecture manipulation . Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering , 65 : 4292
   Google Scholar
• Labelle , L. , Lamarche , M. C. and Laurence , J. 1990 . Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: A brief communication . International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis , 38 : 315 – 319 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labelle , L. , Laurence , J.-R. , Nadon , R. and Perry , C. 1990 . Hypnotizability, preference for an imagic cognitive style, and memory creation in hypnosis . Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 99 : 222 – 228 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus , E. 1993 . The reality of repressed memories . American Psychologist , 48 : 518 – 537 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann , T. and Sheehan , P. 1988 . Hypnotically induced pseudomemories—sampling conditions among hypnotizable subjects . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54 : 339 – 346 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally , R. J. and Geraerts , E. 2009 . A new solution to the recovered memory debate . Perspectives on Psychological Science , 4 ( 2 ) : 126 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya , J. M. 1995 . Requiring clear and convincing proof in tort claims involving recently recovered repressed memories . Southwestern University Law Review , 25 : 173 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Nachson , I. , Read , J. D. , Seelau , S. M. , Goodyear-Smith , F. , Lobb , B. Davies , D. 2007 . Effects of prior knowledge and expert statement on belief in recovered memories: An international perspective . International Journal of Law and Psychiatry , 30 : 224 – 236 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz , J. S. , Lynn , S. J. , Benoit , G. E. and Fite , R. 2003 . Hypnosis and memory illusions: An investigation using the Deese/Roediger and McDermott paradigm . Imagination, Cognition, and Personality , 22 : 3 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 22 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Rotzien , A. L. 2002 . Factors influencing juror verdicts in a case involving repressed memories of abuse . Current Psychology; Developmental, Learning, Personality, and Social , 21 : 220 – 239 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller , R. A. , Wells , E. , Rzepa , S. and Klippenstine , M. A. 2004 . Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: The impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors' decisions . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 36 ( 2 ) : 127 – 136 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan , P. W. , Statham , D. and Jamieson , G. A. 1991 . Pseudomemory effects over time in the hypnotic setting . Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 100 : 39 – 44 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer , K. L. , Horowitz , I. A. and Bourgeois , M. J. 2001 . When juries fail to comply with the law: Biased evidence processing in individual and group decision-making . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27 : 309 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos , N. P. , Gwynn , M. I. and Terrade , K. 1989 . Effects on mock jurors of experts favorable and unfavorable toward hypnotically elicited eyewitness testimony . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 922 – 926 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State v. Mack, 292 N.W.2d 764, 772 (Minn. 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson , M. C. , Bottoms , B. L. and Diamond , S. S. 2010 . Jurors' discussions of a defendant's history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations . Psychology, Public Policy, & Law , 16 : 1 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetford , I. and Schuller , R. A. 1996 . Mock jurors' evaluations of child sexual abuse: The impact of memory recovery and therapeutic intervention . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 14 : 205 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff , G. F. 2008 . Hypnosis and the law: Examining the stereotypes . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35 : 1277 – 1294 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff , G. F. , Vella , M. and Perfect , T. 1992 . The effect of hypnotically elicited testimony on juror's judgments of guilt and innocence . Journal of Social Psychology , 132 : 591 – 595 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webert , D. R. 2003 . Are the courts in a trance? Approaches to the admissibility of hypnotically enhanced testimony on light of empirical evidence . The American Criminal Law Review , 40 : 1301 – 1327 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , L. , Greene , E. and Loftus , E. G. 1986 . Beliefs about forensic hypnosis . International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis , 34 : 110 – 121 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar