449
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Evaluation for Child Custody: Using Best Practices in a Worst Case Scenario

, , &
Pages 457-470 | Published online: 26 Sep 2012

REFERENCES

  • Achenbach , T. M. 2009 . The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, findings, theory, and applications , Burlington , VT : University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families .
  • Ackerman , M. J. and Ackerman , M. C. 1996 . Child custody evaluation practice: A 1996 survey of psychologists . Family Law Quarterly , 30 : 565 – 586 .
  • Ackerman , M. J. and Ackerman , M. C. 1997 . Child custody evaluation practice: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited) . Professional Psychology: Research & Practice , 28 : 137 – 145 .
  • Ackerman , M. J. and Pritzl , T. 2011 . Child custody evaluation practices: A 20 year follow-up . Family Court Review , 49 : 618 – 28 .
  • Amato , P. and Booth , A. 2001 . The legacy of parents' marital discord: Consequences for children's marital quality . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81 ( 4 ) : 627 – 638 . doi: 10.1037//0022–3514.81.4.627
  • American Psychological Association. (2009). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/child-custody.pdf (http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/child-custody.pdf)
  • Bow , J. N. and Quinnell , F. A. 2001 . Psychologists' current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association guidelines . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 32 : 261 – 268 . doi: 10.1037//0735–7028.32.3–26I
  • Bow , J. N. and Quinnell , F. A. 2002 . A critical review of child custody evaluation reports . Family Court Review , 40 : 164 – 176 .
  • Felner , R. D. , Rowlison , R. T. , Farber , S. S. , Primavera , J. and Bishop , T. A. 1987 . Child custody resolution: A study of social science involvement and impact . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 18 ( 5 ) : 468 – 474 .
  • Fuhrmann , G. S. W. and Zibbell , R. A. 2012 . Evaluation for child custody , New York , NY : Oxford .
  • Gould , J. W. , Kirkpatrick , H. D. , Austin , W. G. and Martindale , D. A. 2004 . Critiquing a colleague's forensic advisory report: A suggested protocol for application to child custody evaluations . Journal of Child Custody , 1 ( 3 ) : 37 – 64 . doi: 10.1300/J190v01n03_04
  • Gould , J. and Martindale , D. 2007 . The art and science of child custody evaluations , New York , NY : Guilford .
  • Gould , J. W. and Stahl , P. M. 2000 . The art and science of child custody evaluations: Integrating clinical and forensic mental health models . Family and Conciliation Courts Review , 38 : 392 – 414 .
  • Grisso , T. 1986 . Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments , New York , NY : Plenum .
  • Grisso , T. 2003 . Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments , 2nd , New York , NY : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press .
  • Grisso , T. 2005 . Commentary on “Empirical and ethical problems with custody recommendations”: What now? . Family Court Review , 43 : 223 – 228 .
  • Heilbrun , K. 1995 . Child custody evaluation: Critically assessing mental health experts and psychological tests . Family Law Quarterly , 29 : 63 – 78 .
  • Heilbrun , K. 2001 . Principles of forensic mental health assessment , New York : Kluwer Academic .
  • Heilbrun , K. , Grisso , T. and Goldstein , A. M. 2009 . Foundations of forensic mental health assessment , New York , NY : Oxford .
  • Heilbrun , K. , Grisso , T. and Goldstein , A. M. 2012 . “ Foreword ” . In Evaluation for child custody , Edited by: Fuhrmann , G. S. W. and Zibbell , R. A. vii – ix . New York , NY : Oxford .
  • Heilbrun , K. , Marczyk , G. R. and DeMatteo , D. 2002 . Forensic mental health assessment: A casebook , New York , NY : Oxford .
  • Horvath , L. S. , Logan , T. K. and Walker , R. 2002 . Child custody cases: A content analysis of evaluations in practice . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 33 : 557 – 565 . doi: 10.1037//0735-7028.33.6.557
  • Keilin , W. G. and Bloom , L. J. 1986 . Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 4 : 338 – 346 .
  • Kirkpatrick , H. D. 2004 . A floor, not a ceiling: Beyond guidelines—an argument for minimum standards of practice in conducting child custody and visitation evaluations . Journal of Child Custody , 1 : 61 – 75 . doi: 10.1300/J190v01n01_05
  • LaFortune , K. A. and Carpenter , B. N. 1998 . Custody evaluations: A survey of mental health professionals . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 16 : 207 – 224 .
  • Martindale , D. A. and Gould , J. W. 2004 . The forensic model: Ethics and scientific methodology applied to custody evaluations . Journal of Child Custody , 1 ( 2 ) : 1 – 22 .
  • Melton , G. B. , Petrila , J. , Poythress , N. G. and Slobogin , C. 2007 . Psychological evaluations for the court: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers , 3rd , New York , NY : Guilford .
  • Morse , S. 1978 . Law and mental health professional: The limits of expertise . Professional Psychology , 9 : 389 – 399 .
  • Otto , R. , Buffington-Vollum , J. and Edens , J. 2003 . “ Child custody evaluation ” . In Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology , Edited by: Goldstein , A. and Weiner , I. Vol. 11 , 179 – 207 . New York , NY : Wiley .
  • Schutz , B. , Dixon , E. , Lindenberger , J. and Ruther , N. 1989 . Solomon's sword: A practical guide to conducting child custody evaluations , San Francisco , CA : Jossey Bass .
  • Tippins , T. and Wittman , J. 2005 . Empirical and ethical problems with custody recommendations: A call for clinical humility and judicial vigilance . Family Court Review , 43 : 266 – 269 .
  • Zelechoski , A. D. 2009 . The content of child custody evaluation reports: A forensic assessment principles-based analysis , Philadelphia , PA : Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.