Should Police Use ACID? Training and Credibility Assessment Using Transcripts Versus Recordings

REFERENCES

• Akehurst, L., Bull, R., Vrij, A., & Köhnken, G. (2004). The effects of training professional groups and lay persons to use criteria-based content analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansarra, R., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Hines, A., Fleck, R., Cole, L., & Belardy, D. (2011). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. European Journal of Psychology Applied to the Legal Context, 3(2), 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2014). When in interviews to disclose information to suspects and to challenge them? In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 167–181). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Colwell, L., Perry, A., Wasieleski, D., & Billings, T. (2008). The Test of Malingered Incompetence (TOMI): A forced-choice instrument for assessing cognitive malingering in competence to stand trial evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26(3), 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock, C., & Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., & Fede, J. (2013). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): An example of the new paradigm of Differential Recall Enhancement. In B. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in eyewitness memory, credibility assessment, and investigative interviewing (pp. 259–291). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L., & Woods, D. (2009). Training in assessment criteria indicative of deception to improve credibility judgments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., & Michlik, P. M. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(2), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Rachel, A., & Colwell, L. (2007). Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail characteristics as predictors of witness credibility. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 25(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2007). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4(3), 167–180. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jip.73
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Woods, D., & Michlik, P. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., & Colwell, K. (2011). Assessing feigned cognitive impairment in defendants hospitalized for competency restoration: Further validation of the TOMI. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(4), 293–310. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15228932.2011.562804
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Hartwig, M., Cole, L., Werdin, K., & Youschak, K. (2012). Teaching professionals to detect deception: The efficacy of a brief training workshop. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(1), 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Miller, R. S., & Lyons, J. (2006). US police officers’ knowledge regarding behaviors indicative of deception: Implications for eradicating erroneous beliefs through training. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(5), 489–503. http://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500254839
   Google Scholar
• Dando, C., & Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police officers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docan-Morgan, T. (2007). Training law enforcement officers to detect deception: A critique of previous research and framework for the future. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3(2), 143–171.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychology, 46, 913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., Geiselman, R., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of the actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 722–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police and Administration, 14(1), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Rangmar, J., & Strömwall, L. A. (2014). Small cells of suspects: Eliciting cues to deception by strategic interviewing. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1413
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2006). Will it end in tiers: Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 167–189). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30(5), 603–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, A., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Garrett, E., Ansarra, R., & Montalvo, L. (2010). Impression management strategies of deceivers and honest reporters in an investigative interview. European Journal of Psychology Applied to the Legal Context, 2(1), 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 137–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S. A., Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Robinson, M. (2008). See no lies, hear no lies: Differences in discrimination accuracy and response bias when watching or listening to police suspect interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(8), 1062–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal And Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo, L., Hallinan, C., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Morrissey, D., Bonilla, Y., & Colwell, K. (2013). Using ACID to improve credibility assessments with written and audio statements. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 31(2), 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. A., Colwell, K., & Hazlett, G. A. (2011). Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(5), 1227–1234. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21854383
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & Yuille, J. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20(4), 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., House, J., McDonald, S., & Eastwood, J. (2012). Police witness interview training, supervision, and feedback: A survey of Canadian police officers. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54(3), 363–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckle-Nelson, J., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Florence, S., Youschak, K., & Duarte, A. (2010). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): Replication and gender differences. Open Criminology, (3), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(6), 579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Robbins, E., & Robinson, M. (2006). Police officers ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 741–755.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal Of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(4), 239–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuille, J. C. (1989). Analysis of the statements of victims, witnesses and suspects. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment (pp. 175–191). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Driver, R. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal Of Nonverbal Behavior, 6(2), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar