The Experience of Deniers on a Community Sex Offender Group Program

References

• Allam, J. (2001). Effective practice in work with sex offenders: A reconviction study comparing treated and non-treated offenders. Report to the West Midland Probation Service. Birmingham, UK: West Midlands Probation.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. (1998). STEP 3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. Home Office. London.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, N., Winder, B., Thorne, K., & Gregson, M. (2011). “No-one in the world would ever wanna speak to me again”: An interpretative phenomenological analysis into convicted sexual offenders’ accounts and experiences of maintaining and leaving denial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(7), 563–585. doi:10.1080/10683160903397532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, L., Beech, A. R., & Goodwill, A. M. (2010). Examining the influence of denial, motivation, and risk in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 22(1), 78–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, L., Howard, P., Barnett, G., Wakeling, H., & Miles, C. (2015). Relationships between denial, risk, and recidivism in sexual offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 157–166. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0333-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R., Shute, S., Feilzer, M., & Wilcox, A. (2002). Sex offenders emerging from long-term imprisonment: A study of their long-term reconviction rates and of parole board members’ judgements of their risk. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 371–394.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. G., & Grubin, D. H. (1992). Patterns of denial in sex offenders. Psychological Medicine, 22(1), 191–196. doi:10.1017/S0033291700032840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S. (2011). “But I didn’t do it!”: Ethical treatment of sex offenders in denial. Sexual Abuse, 23(3), 346–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Macgowan, M. J. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Willmot, P. (2004). The process of overcoming denial in sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(1), 51–61. doi:10.1080/13552600410001670937
   Google Scholar
• Lund, C. A. (2000). Predictors of sexual recidivism: Did meta-analysis clarify the role and relevance of denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(4), 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Maletzky, B. M. (1991). Treating the sexual offender. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maletzky, B. M. (1993). Factors associated with success or failure in behavioural and cognitive treatment of sexual offenders. Sex Abuse, 6(4), 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Maletzky, B. M., & Steinhauser, C. (1998). The Portland sexual abuse clinic. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 105–116). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E. (2009). Getting the context right for sex offender treatment. In D. Prescott (Ed.), Building motivation for change in sexual offenders. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., Webster, S. D., Wakeling, H. C., & Keylock, H. G. (2013). Why do sexual offenders refuse treatment? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(2), 191–206. doi:10.1080/13552600.2012.703701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L. (1994). Treatment effects on denial and minimization in incarcerated sex offenders. Behaviour, Research, and Therapy, 32(5), 559–564. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90145-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., Thornton, D., Marshall, L. E., Fernandez, Y. M., & Mann, R. (2001). Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse, 13(3), 205–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maruna, S. & Mann, R. E. (2006). A Fundamental Attribution Error? Rethinking Cognitive Distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S. & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, K. L., Hanson, R. K., Firestone, P., Moulden, H. M., Greenberg, D. M., & Bradford, J. M. (2007). Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders. Sex Abuse, 19(2), 91–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J., & DiClemente, C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19(3), 276–288.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B., & Baim, C. (1999). A community-based programme for sex offenders who deny their offending behaviour. Probation Journal, 46(4), 225–233. doi:10.1177/026455059904600402
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(4), 325–334. doi:10.1017/S135246580001643X
   Google Scholar
• Salter, A. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and their victims: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schlank, A. M., & Shaw, T. (1996). Treating sexual offenders who deny their guilt: A pilot study. Sexual Abuse, 8(1), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L., & Wright, R. C. (2004). Understanding denial in sexual offenders: A review of cognitive and motivational processes to avoid responsibility. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/1524838003259320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware, J., & Mann, R. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 279–288. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. (1996). The strategic and systematic management of denial in the cognitive/behavioural treatment of sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 8(1), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, P. (2009). Is sexual offender denial related to sex offence risk and recidivism? A review and treatment implications. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(2–3), 183–199. doi:10.1080/10683160802190905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar