References
- Antonijević, S., & Cahoy, E. S. (2014). Personal library curation: An ethnographic study of scholars’ information practices. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 287–306. doi:10.1353/pla.2014.0010
- Cahoy, E. S. (2018). Leave the browser behind: Placing discovery within the user’s workflow. LIBER Quarterly, 28(1), 1–19. doi:10.18352/lq.10221
- Cuschieri, S., Grech, V., & Calleja, N. (2019). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): The use of bibliographic management software. Early Human Development, 128, 118–119. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.09.012
- Cushing, A. L., & Dumbleton, O. (2017). We have to make an effort with it’: Exploring the use of stages to help understand the personal information management needs of humanities and social science doctoral students managing dissertation information. IFLA Journal, 43(1), 40–50. doi:10.1177/0340035216686983
- Emanuel, J. (2013). Users and citation management tools: Use and support. Reference Services Review, 41(4), 639–659. doi:10.1108/RSR-02-2013-0007
- Francese, E. (2013). Usage of reference management software at the University of Torino. Academic Libraries; References; References Management Software; Users, 4(2), 30. doi:10.4403/jlis.it-8679
- Gilmour, R., & Cobus-Kuo, L. (2011). Reference management software: A comparative analysis of four products. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Summer, Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/11-summer/refereed2.html
- Glassman, N. R., & Sorensen, K. (2012). Citation management. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 9(3), 223–231. doi:10.1080/15424065.2012.707097
- Hristova, M. (2012). RefWorks usage patterns: Exploring the first four semesters of use by faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 17(2), 45–64. doi:10.1080/10875301.2012.720654
- Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
- Lonergan, N. (2017). Reference management software preferences among Liberal Arts faculty. Reference Services Review, 45(4), 584–595. doi:10.1108/RSR-06-2017-0024
- Lorenzetti, D. L., & Ghali, W. A. (2013). Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An exploration of usage and usability. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 141. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-141
- Madhusudan, M. (2016). Use of online citation tools by students and research scholars of department of library and informatio science, University of Delhi. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 36(3), 164–172. doi:10.14429/djlit.36.3.9428
- Marino, W. (2012). Fore‐cite: Tactics for evaluating citation management tools. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 295–310. doi:10.1108/00907321211228336
- McColl, R. (2018). Leveraging Citation Management Software (CMS) for broad library impact. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research and Practice, 6(2), 93–105. doi:10.5195/PALRAP.2018.189
- Osmani, M., Mza, R., Ali Ahmad, B., & Sabir Arif, A. (2016). Reference Management Software (RMS) in an academic environment: A survey at a Research University in Malaysia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 88(1), 135–144.
- Ram, S., & Anbu, K. J. P. (2014). The use of bibliographic management software by Indian Library and Information Science Professionals. Reference Services Review, 42(3), 499–513. doi:10.1108/RSR-08-2013-0041
- Rempel, H. G., & Mellinger, M. (2015). Bibliographic management tool adoption and use: A qualitative research study using the UTAUT model. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 54(4), 43–53. doi:10.5860/rusq.54n4.43
- Sarrafzadeh, M., & Hazeri, A. (2014). The familiarity and use of reference management software by lis faculties in Iran. New Library World, 115(11/12), 558–570. doi:10.1108/NLW-02-2014-0018
- Speare, M. (2018). Graduate student use and non-use of reference and PDF Management Software: An exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 762–774. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.019