The effects of visual realism, spatial abilities, and competition on performance in map-based route learning in men

References

• Albaret, J. M., & Aubert, E. (1996). Etalonnage 15-19 ans du test de rotation mentale de Vandenberg. Evolutions Psychomotrices, 8(34), 206–209.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biland, J., & Çöltekin, A. (2017). An empirical assessment of the impact of the light direction on the relief inversion effect in shaded relief maps: NNW is better than NW. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(4), 358–372. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1185647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucker, B., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014). Learning with dynamic and static visualizations: Realistic details only benefit learners with high visuospatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 330–339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brügger, A., Fabrikant, S. I., & Çöltekin, A. (2016). An empirical evaluation of three elevation change symbolization methods along routes in bicycle maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1193766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, J., Weinberg, R., & Horn, T. S. (2003). The intensity and directional interpretation of anxiety: Fluctuations throughout competition and relationship to performance. The Sport Psychologist, 17(1), 35–54. doi:10.1123/tsp.17.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Bleisch, S., Andrienko, G., & Dykes, J. (2017). Persistent research challenges in geovisualization. International Journal of Cartography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/23729333.2017.1302910
   Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Lokka, I.-E., & Boér, A. (2015, August 23–28). The utilization of publicly available map types by non-experts – A choice experiment. Proceedings of the 27th International Cartographic Conference (ICC 2015), International Cartographic Association, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2015/papers/13/fullpaper/T13-593_1430419913.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Lokka, I.-E., & Zahner, M. (2016). On the usability and usefulness of 3d (geo) visualizations – A focus on virtual reality environments. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (vol. XLI-B2, pp. 387–392). Hannover: ISPRS.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., Kavussanu, M., McIntyre, D., & Ring, C. (2011). Effects of competition on endurance performance and the underlying psychological and physiological mechanisms. Biological Psychology, 86(3), 370–378. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, J. A., Moore, K. E., & Fairbairn, D. (1999). From Chernoff to Imhof and beyond. In Proceedings of the fourth symposium on virtual reality modeling language - VRML ’99 (pp. 99–104). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/299246.299279
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I., Hespanha, S. R., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(1), 13–29. doi:10.1080/00045600903362378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J., Arnold, P., Pettifer, S., Adams, J., Graham, T., & MacManamon, M. (2003). Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(4), 219–227. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.9.4.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., Dougherty, V., & Bell, S. (1995). Acquiring spatial knowledge: Survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 134–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, M., Slabbekoorn, D., Van Goozen, S. H. M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & Güntürkün, O. (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114(6), 1245–1250. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.6.1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell, ‎K. Marriott, & ‎A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2004. (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Canham, M. S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2010). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 37–53. doi:10.1037/a0017683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Kriz, S. (2008). Effects of knowledge and spatial ability on learning from animation. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 3–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. S. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica: the International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44(3), 171–186. doi:10.3138/carto.44.3.171
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. A. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations – Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 392–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., Swain, A., & Hardy, L. (1993). Intensity and direction dimensions of competitive state anxiety and relationships with performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11(6), 525–532. doi:10.1080/02640419308730023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(7), 1099–1132. doi:10.1080/03640210801898177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuth, H. (1976). Verisimilitude or the approach to the whole truth. Philosophy of Science, 43(3), 311–336. doi:10.1086/288691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 943–969. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., Freksa, C., & Winter, S. (2006). You-are-here maps in emergencies – the danger of getting lost. Journal of Spatial Sciences, 51(1), 117–131. doi:10.1080/14498596.2006.9635068
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding : A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47(9/10), 389–401. doi:10.1023/A:1021668724970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. U., Klippel, A., & Tappe, H. (2003). The effect of motion in graphical user interfaces. In A. Butz, A. Krüger, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Smart Graphics. SG 2003. (pp. 12–21). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-37620-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T. (2005). Wayfinding with maps and verbal directions. In Bruno G. Bara, Lawrence W. Barsalou, & Monica Bucciarelli (Eds.) XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2005) (pp. 1473-1478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2005/docs/p1473.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. M., & Miller, R. A. (1983). Design strategies for computer-based information displays in real-time control systems. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 25(4), 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 515–534. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035–1070. doi:10.1037/a0028324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 214–228. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfitt, G., & Pates, J. (1999). The effects of cognitive and somatic anxiety and self-confidence on components of performance during competition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(5), 351–356. doi:10.1080/026404199365867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2006). Are people with high and low mental rotation abilities differently susceptible to the alignment effect? Perception, 35(3), 369–383. doi:10.1068/p5465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1976). A note on verismilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(2), 147–159. doi:10.1093/bjps/27.2.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, B., Cordero, M. I., & Sandi, C. (2010). Learning under stress: The inverted-U-shape function revisited. Learning & Memory, 17(10), 522–530. doi:10.1101/lm.1914110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scerbo, M. W., & Dawson, S. (2007). High fidelity, high performance? Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(4), 224–230. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31815c25f1
   Google Scholar
• Shryock, C. M. (1939). Gradations in map learning. Journal of Geography, 38(5), 181–187. doi:10.1080/00221343908987585
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & Cook, M. B. (2011). Naïve realism: Folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 579–608. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01114.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & St John, M. (2005a). Naïve realism: Limits of realism as a display principle. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(17), 1564–1568. doi:10.1177/154193120504901714
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & St John, M. (2005b). Naive realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 13(3), 6–13. doi:10.1177/106480460501300303
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). The STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, S., & Hirtle, S. C. (2010). The role of motivation and complexity on wayfinding performance. In R. Purves & R. Weibel (Eds.) Extended Abstracts Volume, GIScience 2010. Retrieved from http://www.giscience2010.org/pdfs/paper_132.pdf
   Google Scholar
• St John, M., Smallman, H. S., Bank, T. E., & Cowen, M. B. (2001). Tactical routing using two-dimensional and three-dimensional views of terrain. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45 (18), 1409–1413. doi:10.1177/154193120104501820
   Google Scholar
• Stanne, M. B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 133–154. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavanti, M., & Lind, M. (2001). 2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory. In IEEE symposium on information visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001 (pp. 139–145). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen, J. C., Francelet, R., Coltekin, A., Richter, K.-F., Fabrikant, S. I., & Sandi, C. (2016). Not all anxious individuals get lost: Trait anxiety and mental rotation ability interact to explain performance in map-based route learning in men. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 132, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2016.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560–589. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrower, N. J. (2008). Maps and civilization: Cartography in culture and society. (3rd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez, M. C., Silver, D., & Tremaine, M. (2005). Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences. In  C. T. Silva, E. Groller, & H. E. Rushmeier (Eds.), VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005 (pp. 511–518). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/VISUAL.2005.1532836
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 92–114. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J. (2010). Map users’ preferences and performance under time pressure. In R. Purves & R. Weibel (Eds.) Extended Abstracts Volume, GIScience 2010. Retrieved from http://www.giscience2010.org/pdfs/paper_149.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2011a). The effect of gender and spatial abilites on map use preferences and performance in road selection tasks. In A. Ruas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Cartography Conference (ICC 2011). Paris: International Cartographic Association. Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/C2-Mapping%20network%20and%20route/CO-232.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2013). How users interact with a 3D geo-browser under time pressure. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(1), 40–52. doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.762140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2011b). How do decision time and realism affect map-based decision making? In M. Egenhofer, N. Giudice, R. Moratz, & M. Worboys (Eds.), Spatial information theory. COSIT 2011. (1–19). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_1
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1550-7149
   Google Scholar
• Zanola, S., Fabrikant, S. I., & Çöltekin, A. (2009, November). The effect of realism on the confidence in spatial data quality. International Cartographic Conference, ICC 2009, Santiago, Chile. Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/nonref/20_18.pdf
   Google Scholar