462
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Data scale as cartography: a semi-automatic approach for thematic web map creation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 153-170 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 03 Oct 2019, Published online: 05 Nov 2019

References

  • Andrienko, G., & Andrienko, N. (1998). Intelligent visualization and dynamic manipulation: Two complementary instruments to support data exploration with GIS. In T. Catarci, M. F. Costabile, G. Santucci, & L. Tarantino (Eds.), Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces - AVI ‘98 (pp. 66–75). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/948496.948506
  • Andrienko, G., & Andrienko, N. (1999). Interactive maps for visual data exploration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(4), 355–374. doi:10.1080/136588199241247
  • Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2001). Intelligent support for geographic data analysis and decision making in the web. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 5(2), 115–128.
  • Attard, J., Orlandi, F., & Auer, S. (2016). Value creation on open government data. In 49th hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2605–2614). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.326
  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.
  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. doi:10.1080/10447310802205776
  • Benitez-Paez, F., Degbelo, A., Trilles, S., & Huerta, J. (2018). Roadblocks hindering the reuse of open geodata in Colombia and Spain: A data user’s perspective. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(1), 6. doi:10.3390/ijgi7010006
  • Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. (W. J. Berg, Trans.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Bostock, M., & Davies, J. (2013). Code as cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 50(2), 129–135. doi:10.1179/0008704113Z.00000000078
  • Brewer, C. A. (2003). A transition in improving maps: The ColorBrewer example. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(2), 159–162. doi:10.1559/152304003100011126
  • Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40.
  • Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., & Loukis, E. (2016). A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 41–63. doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1124720
  • Chrisman, N. R. (1998). Rethinking levels of measurement for Cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(4), 231–242. doi:10.1559/152304098782383043
  • Degbelo, A. (2017). Linked data and visualization: Two sides of the transparency coin. In H. T. Vo & B. Howe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd ACM sigspatial workshop on smart cities and urban analytics - urbangis’17 (Vols. 1–8). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3152178.3152191
  • Degbelo, A., Granell, C., Trilles, S., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., & Kray, C. (2016). Opening up smart cities: Citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2), 16. doi:10.3390/ijgi5020016
  • Degbelo, A., & Kauppinen, T. (2018). Increasing transparency through web maps. In P. A. Champin, F. L. Gandon, M. Lalmas, & P. G. Ipeirotis (Eds.), Companion of proceedings of the web conference 2018 - WWW ‘18 (pp. 899–904). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3184558.3191515
  • Degbelo, A., & Kray, C. (2018). Intelligent geovisualizations for open government data (vision paper). In 26th ACM sigspatial international conference on advances in geographic information systems. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3274895.3274940
  • Degbelo, A., Wissing, J., & Kauppinen, T. (2018). A comparison of geovisualizations and data tables for transparency enablement in the open government data landscape. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(4), 39–64. doi:10.4018/IJEGR.2018100104
  • Fechner, T., & Kray, C. (2014). Georeferenced open data and augmented interactive geo-visualizations as catalysts for citizen engagement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 6(1), 14–35. doi:10.29379/jedem.v6i1.283
  • Freksa, C., & Schultheis, H. (2015). Three ways of using space. In D. Montello, K. Grossner, & D. Janelle (Eds.), Space in mind: Concepts for spatial learning and education ( Chap. 2, pp. 31–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gould, N., & Mackaness, W. (2016). From taxonomies to ontologies: Formalizing generalization knowledge for on-demand mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43(3), 208–222. doi:10.1080/15230406.2015.1072737
  • Graves, A., & Hendler, J. (2013). Visualization tools for open government data. In S.Mellouli, L.F.Luna-Reyes, & J.Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on digital government research - dg.o ‘13 (pp. 136–145). NewYork ACM doi:10.1145/2479724.2479746
  • Graves, A., & Hendler, J. (2014). A study on the use of visualizations for open government data. Information Polity, 19(1,2), 73–91. doi:10.3233/IP-140333
  • Griffin, A. L. (2017). Color theory. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0766
  • Hardisty, F., & Robinson, A. C. (2011). The GeoViz toolkit: Using component-oriented coordination methods for geographic visualization and analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(2), 191–210. doi:10.1080/13658810903214203
  • Harrower, M., & Brewer, C. A. (2003). ColorBrewer.org: An online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. The Cartographic Journal, 40(1), 27–37. doi:10.1179/000870403235002042
  • Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 14–40. doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007
  • Johnson, P. A., Sieber, R., Scassa, T., Stephens, M., & Robinson, P. (2017). The cost(s) of geospatial open data. Transactions in GIS, 21(3), 434–445. doi:10.1111/tgis.12283
  • Jones, C. E., Haklay, M., Griffiths, S., & Vaughan, L. (2009). A less-is-more approach to geovisualization – Enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(8), 1077–1093. doi:10.1080/13658810802705723
  • Kiefer, P., Giannopoulos, I., Anagnostopoulos, V., Schöning, J., & Raubal, M. (2017). Controllability matters: The user experience of adaptive maps. GeoInformatica, 21(3), 619–641. doi:10.1007/s10707-016-0282-x
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Lewis, J. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
  • MacEachren, A. M. (2019). (re)Considering Bertin in the age of big data and visual analytics. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46(2), 101–118. doi:10.1080/15230406.2018.1507758
  • Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P., & Stolte, C. (2007). Show Me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1137–1144. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2007.70594
  • Mauri, M., Elli, T., Caviglia, G., Uboldi, G., & Azzi, M. (2017). RAWGraphs: A visualisation platform to create open outputs. In F. Patern’o, L. D. Spano, C. Ardito, & C. Santoro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th biannual conference on italian sigchi chapter - chitaly ‘17 (pp. 1–5). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3125571.3125585
  • Meng, L. (2018). Four persistent research questions in cartography. Journal of the Croatian Cartographic Society, 17(29), 1–18. doi:10.32909/kg.17.29.1
  • Murray, S. (2013). Interactive data visualization for the web: An introduction to designing with D3 (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  • Nagel, T., Klerkx, J., Vande Moere, A., & Duval, E. (2013). Unfolding – a library for interactive maps. In A. Holzinger, M. Ziefle, M. Hitz, & M. Debevc (Eds.), Human factors in computing and informatics - southchi 2013 (pp. 497–513). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39062-331
  • Ottley, A., Yang, H., & Chang, R. (2015). Personality as a predictor of user strategy: How locus of control affects search strategies on tree visualizations. In B. Begole, J. Kim, K. Inkpen, & W. Woo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems - chi ‘15 (pp. 3251–3254). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702590
  • Pezanowski, S., MacEachren, A. M., Savelyev, A., & Robinson,A. C. (2018). SensePlace3: A geovisual framework to analyze place–time–attribute information in social media. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(5), 420–437. doi:10.1080/15230406.2017.1370391
  • Plewe, B. (2007). Web cartography in the United States. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(2), 133–136. doi:10.1559/152304007781002235
  • Poplin, A. (2015). How user-friendly are online interactive maps? Survey based on experiments with heterogeneous users. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(4), 358–376. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.991427
  • Poplin, A., Guan, W., & Lewis, B. (2017). Online survey of heterogeneous users and their usage of the interactive mapping platform WorldMap. The Cartographic Journal, 54(3), 214–232. doi:10.1080/00087041.2016.1229248
  • Quinn, A. J., & Bederson,B.B. (2011). Human computation: A survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In D. S. Tan, S. Amershi, B. Begole, W. A. Kellogg, & M. Tungare (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ‘11 (pp. 1403). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979148
  • R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
  • Reichenbacher, T. (2017). Mobile usage and adaptive visualization. In S. Shekhar, H. Xiong, & X. Zhou (Eds.), Encyclopedia of GIS (pp. 1289–1294). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1799
  • Robinson, A. C. (2017). Geovisual analytics. In Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge, 2017(Q3). doi:10.22224/gistbok/2017.3.6
  • Robinson, A. C. (2019). Elements of viral cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46(4), 293–310. doi:10.1080/15230406.2018.1484304
  • Robinson, A. C., Peuquet, D. J., Pezanowski, S., Hardisty, F. A., & Swedberg, B. (2017). Design and evaluation of a geovisual analytics system for uncovering patterns in spatio-temporal event data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(3), 216–228. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1139467
  • Roth, R. E. (2013). Interactive maps: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 6, 59–115. doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2013.6.105
  • Roth, R. E. (2017). Visual variables. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology (pp. 1–11). Oxford: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0761
  • Roth, R. E., Donohue, R. G., Sack, C. M., Wallace, T. R., & Buckingham, T. M. A. (2014). A process for keeping pace with evolving web mapping technologies. Cartographic Perspectives, 2014(78), 25–52. doi:10.14714/CP78.1273
  • Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. doi:10.3233/IP-160012
  • Sarjakoski, L. T., & Sarjakoski, T. (2008). User interfaces and adaptive maps. In S. Shekhar & H. Xiong (Eds.), Encyclopedia of GIS (pp. 1205–1212). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35973-11431
  • Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J.,Bartlam, B.,… Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  • Sauro, J. (2013). 10 things to know about the system usability scale (SUS). Retrieved from https://measuringu.com/10-things-sus/
  • Savelyev, A., & MacEachren, A. M. (2018). Augmenting geovisual analytics of social media data with heterogeneous information network mining—cognitive plausibility assessment. PloS One, 13(12), e0206906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206906
  • Schnur, S., Bektaş, K., & Çöltekin, A. (2018). Measured and perceived visual complexity: A comparative study among three online map providers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(3), 238–254. doi:10.1080/15230406.2017.1323676
  • Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677
  • Tsou, M.-H. (2011). Revisiting web cartography in the United States: The rise of user- centered design. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(3), 250–257. doi:10.1559/15230406382250
  • Van Ho, Q., Lundblad, P., Astrom, T., & Jern, M. (2012). A web-enabled visualization toolkit for geovisual analytics. Information Visualization, 11(1), 22–42. doi:10.1177/1473871611425870
  • Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, X., Chen, Y., & Meng, L. (2001). Adaptive geovisualization: An approach towards the design of intelligent geovisualization systems. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 11(S1), 1–8. doi:10.1007/BF02837439
  • Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. CoRR. abs/1308.5. arXiv: 1308.5499.
  • Zhang, M., Wang, H., Lu, Y., Li, T., Guang, Y., Liu, C., … Rishe, N. (2015). TerraFly GeoCloud: An online spatial data analysis and visualization system. ACM Transctions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 6(3), 1–24. doi:10.1145/2700494
  • Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012). Socio- technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(2), 156–172.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.