Why we can read maps

References

• Aalbers, M. B. (2014a). Do maps make geography? Part 1: Redlining, planned shrinkage, and the places of decline. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(4), 525–556.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2014b). Do maps make geography? Part 2: Post-Katrina New Orleans, post-foreclosure Cleveland and neoliberal urbanism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(4), 557–582.
   Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. (2014c). Do maps make geography? Part 3: Reconnecting the trace. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(4), 586–588.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A. L., Schmid, F., Al-Salman, R., & Kauppinen, T. (2014). Ambiguity and plausibility: Managing classification quality in volunteered geographic information. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL) (pp. 143–152). https://doi.org/10.1145/2666310.2666392 . New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Aliakbarian, M., & Weibel, R. (2016). Integration of folksonomies into the process of map generalization. In Proceedings of the 19th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Sarkar, D., & Palen, L. (2019). Corporate editors in the evolving landscape of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(5), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. K. (1988). Applications of a cartographic communication model to tactual map design. The American Cartographer, 15(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304088783887008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. H. (1996). What was a map? The lexicographers reply. Cartographica, 33(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3138/NJ8V-8514-871T-221K
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, V., Touya, G., & Raimond, A.-M. (2016). Quality analysis of the Parisian OSM toponyms evolution. In C. Capineri et al. (Eds.), European handbook of crowdsourced geographic information (pp. 97–112). London, UK: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bax.h
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, J. J., Barron, C., Bakillah, M., & Helbich, M. (2013). Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap contributors together with their contributions. In Proceedings of the 16th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, J. J., Mooney, P., Zipf, A., & Schauss, A. (2015). Quality assessment of the contributed land use information from OpenStreetMap versus authoritative datasets. In J. J. Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (Eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Experiences, research, and applications (pp. 37–58). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Ballatore, A., & Zipf, A. (2015). A conceptual quality framework for volunteered geographic information. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT) (pp. 89–107). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_5. Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Barrington Leigh, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2017). The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0180698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, C., Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2014). A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Transactions in GIS, 18(6), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelborth, T. (1996). Begründungsstrategien. Ein Weg durch die analytische Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050073514
   Google Scholar
• Bégin, D., Devillers, R., & Roche, S. (2013). Assessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) quality based on contributors’ mapping behaviours. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality (pp. 149–154). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W1-149-2013. Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Bishr, M., & Kuhn, W. (2007). Geospatial information bottom-up: A matter of trust and semantics. In Proceedings of the 10th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (pp. 365–387). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72385-1_22. Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Bishr, M., & Kuhn, W. (2013). Trust and reputation models for quality assessment of human sensor observations. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT) (pp. 53–73). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_4. Scarborough, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, C. (2014). Reproduction of social fragmentations in OpenStreetMap: The example of Jerusalem. Kartographische Nachrichten, 64(3), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544143
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, C. (2017). Diversity in volunteered geographic information: Comparing OpenStreetMap and Wikimapia in Jerusalem. GeoJournal, 82(5), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9721-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, C., & Glasze, G. (2018). Excluding effects of cartographic epistemologies – thinking about mapping paradigms in OpenStreetMap and Wikimapia. Kartographische Nachrichten, 3, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544554
   Google Scholar
• Blanshard, B. (1939). The nature of thought. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bogucka, E. P., Constantinides, M., Aiello, L. M., Quercia, D., So, W., & Bancilhon, M. (2020). Cartographic design of cultural maps. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(6), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2020.3026596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bord, J.-P. (2003). Cartographie, géographie et propagande. De quelques cas dans l’Europe de l’après-guerre. Vingtième Siècle: Revue d’histoire, 80(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.3917/ving.080.0015
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, F. H. (1939). Essays on truth and reality. London, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. The American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N. R., Nedović-Budić, Z., & Bruce, B. C. (2010). An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica, 64(1), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.5623/geomat-2010-0003
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (2009). The cartography of national humiliation and the emergence of China’s geobody. Public Culture, 21(1), 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2008-024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D., & Baronchelli, A. (2018). Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science, 360(6393), 1116–1119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas8827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipeluch, B., Jacob, R., Winstanley, A. C., & Mooney, P. (2010). Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences (Accuracy) (pp. 337–340). Leicester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. J. (1978). The coherence theory of truth. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 34(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364702
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovic, N., Mooney, P., Stoimenov, L., & Minghini, M. (2016). Tagging in volunteered geographic information: An analysis of tagging practices for cities and urban regions in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(12), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5120232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edney, M. H. (1997). Mapping an empire. The geographical construction of British India, 1765–1843. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. U. (2000). Spatial communication with maps: Defining the correctness of maps using a multi-agent simulation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Maps and Diagrammatical Representations of the Environment (pp. 80–99). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_7 . Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Freundschuh, S. M., & Kitchin, R. (1999). Contemporary thought and practice in cognitive mapping research: An introduction. The Professional Geographer, 51(4), 507–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, K. (1994). Mr. Beck’s underground map. A history. Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, I. (2003). The idea of emergent property. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girres, J.-F., & Touya, G. (2010). Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., & Perkins, C. (2015). Social and political dimensions of the OpenStreetMap project: Towards a critical geographical research agenda. In J. J. Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (Eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Experiences, research, and applications (pp. 143–166). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Grodzins, M. (1957). Metropolitan segregation. Scientific American, 197(4), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1057-33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack, S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry. Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01936872
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B, 37(4), 682–703. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. (1988). Maps, knowledge, and power. In D. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (Eds.), The iconography of landscape. Essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments (pp. 277–312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. (1990). Cartography, ethics and social theory. Cartographica, 27(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3138/C211-1512-0603-XJ14
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, B., & Moxley, E. (2009). Terabytes of Tobler: Evaluating the first law in a massive, domain-neutral representation of world knowledge. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT) (pp. 88–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_6 . Aber Wrac’h, France.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, D. W., Seiling, L., & Bröder, A. (2020). The love of large numbers revisited: A coherence model of the popularity bias. Cognition, 195, 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heipke, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(6), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbich, M., Amelunxen, C., Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2012). Comparative spatial analysis of positional accuracy of OpenStreetMap and proprietary geodata. In Proceedings of the GI_Forum (pp. 24–33). Salzburg, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegami, E. (2000). A sociological theory of publics: Identity and culture as emergent properties in networks. Social Research, 67(4), 989–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, K. V. P. (2003). Non-linear models of social systems. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(35), 3678–3685.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, A. J. (2009). Cartographic irresolution and the line of control. Social Text, 27(4), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2009-054
   Google Scholar
• Keil, J., Mocnik, F.-B., Edler, D., Dickmann, F., & Kuchinke, L. (2018). Reduction of map information regulates visual attention without affecting route recognition performance. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(12), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7120469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keßler, C., & de Groot, R. T. A. (2013). Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 16th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (pp. 21–37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00615-4_2. Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• König, D., & tho Pesch, S. (2013). Der Festlandsockelvertrag von 1964 und seine Auswirkungen auf die deutsch-niederländische Küstenmeergrenze. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 73, 483–508.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, I., Voss, A., & Krause-Traudes, M. (2011). A comparison of the street networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany. In S. Geertman, W. Reinhardt, & F. Toppen (Eds.), Advancing geoinformation science for a changing world (pp. 65–84). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19789-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, D., Sandberg, M., & Jiang, B. (2015). Characterizing the heterogeneity of the OpenStreetMap data and community. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(2), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan, C. R. (2017). Motivated cognition: Effects of reward, emotion, and other motivational factors across a variety of cognitive domains. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.111
   Google Scholar
• May, J., & Thrift, N. (Eds.). (2001). Timespace. Geographies of temporality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., & Heck, D. W. (2022). Sequential collaboration: The accuracy of dependent, incremental judgments. Decision. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000193
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., Heck, D. W., & Mocnik, F.-B. (2020). Shared mental models as a psychological explanation for converging mental representations of place – the example of OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Platial Information Science (PLATIAL’19) (pp. 43–50). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3628871 . Coventry, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2015). A scale-invariant spatial graph model ( Doctoral thesis). Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2018a). Dimension as an invariant of street networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications (pp. 455–457). Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2018b). The polynomial volume law of complex networks in the context of local and global optimization. Scientific Reports, 8(11274). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29131-0
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2020). Tracing mental models in cartographic datasets – the case of OpenStreetMap. Abstracts of the International Cartographic Association, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-2-5-2020
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2021). Benford’s law and geographical information – the example of OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(9), 1746–1772. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1829627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., & Fairbairn, D. (2018). Maps telling stories? The Cartographic Journal, 55(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2017.1304498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., & Frank, A. U. (2015). Modelling spatial structures. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT) (pp. 44–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_3. Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., & Kühl, L. (2022). (Un)represented places – a case study of two sports venues in Gelsenkirchen and Dortmund. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Platial Information Science (PLATIAL’21) (pp. 25–30). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767180 . Enschede, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., Mobasheri, A., Griesbaum, L., Eckle, M., Jacobs, C., & Klonner, C. (2018). A grounding-based ontology of data quality measures. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 16, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2018.16.360
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., Zipf, A., & Raifer, M. (2017). The OpenStreetMap folksonomy and its evolution. Geo-spatial Information Science, 20(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1368193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., Goodchild, M. F., Gottsegen, J., & Fohl, P. (2003). Where’s downtown? Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(2–3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2003.9683761
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012a). How social is OpenStreetMap? In Proceedings of the 15th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (pp. 282–287). Avignon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012b). Who are the contributors to OpenStreetMap and what do they do? In Proceedings of the 20th Annual GIS Research UK (GISRUK), Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., & Minghini, M. (2017). A review of OpenStreetMap data. In G. M. Foody et al. (Eds.), Mapping and the citizen sensor (pp. 37–59). London, UK: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbf.c
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J.-C. (1987). The concept of error in cartography. Cartographica, 24(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3138/5R70-4W74-1H17-6X06
   Google Scholar
• Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2012). The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4010001
   Google Scholar
• Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2013). Comparison of volunteered geographic information data contributions and community development for selected world regions. Future Internet, 5(2), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi5020282
   Google Scholar
• Neocleous, M. (2003). Off the map: On violence and cartography. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310030064003
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The psychology of groups: Basic principles. In M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, & K. Jonas (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology. A European perspective (4th ed., pp. 244–262). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, C. (2003). Cartography: Mapping theory. Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph430pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, C. (2004). Cartography – cultures of mapping: Power in practice. Progress in Human Geography, 28(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph504pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraschka, T. (2014). Interpretation und Rationalität. Billigkeitsprinzipien in der philologischen Hermeneutik. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110351163
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. J. (1989). Are maps different from other kinds of geographic information? The Cartographic Journal, 26(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1989.26.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiani, T. H., dos Santos Rocha, R., Castro Degrossi, L., & de Albuquerque, J. P. (2016). Potential of collaborative mapping for disaster relief: A case study of OpenStreetMap in the Nepal earthquake 2015. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 188–197). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.31 . Koloa, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. L., & Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary theories of knowledge (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quill, T. M. (2018). Humanitarian mapping as library outreach: A case for community-oriented mapathons. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1463585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & Bull, F. (2019). Understanding threats to crowdsourced geographic data quality through a study of OpenStreetMap contributor bans. In N. A. Valcik (Ed.), Geospatial information system use in public organizations (pp. 80–96). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429272851-6
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & MacEachren, A. M. (2018). A geovisual analytics exploration of the OpenStreetMap crowd. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1276479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, R. (1977). On closed world data bases. In H. Gallaire & J. Minker (Eds.), Logic and data bases (pp. 55–76). New York, NY: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_3
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1973). The coherence theory of truth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H. (1971). Discussion: An interchange of ideas and reactions. Cartographica, 8(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJ11-02Q4-2284-0308
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H., & Petchenik, B. B. (1975). The map as a communication system. The Cartographic Journal, 12(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1975.12.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2021). Cartographic design as visual storytelling: Synthesis and review of map-based narratives, genres, and tropes. The Cartographic Journal, 58(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen, T. F. (1987, September). Centering of mental maps of the world (Unpublished discussion paper). University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder-Bergen, S., Glasze, G., Michel, B., & Dammann, F. (2021). De/colonizing OpenStreetMap? Local mappers, humanitarian and commercial actors and the changing modes of collaborative mapping. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10547-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. C., & Tobler, W. R. (1957). Multiple use concept in cartography. The Professional Geographer, 9(5), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1957.095_5.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (1995). On drawing lines on a map. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT) (pp. 475–484). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_31 . Semmering, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2001). Fiat objects. Topoi, 20(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017948522031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaiser, V., Hedström, P., Ranganathan, S., Jansson, K., Nordvik, M. K., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2016). Identifying complex dynamics in social systems: A new methodological approach applied to study school segregation. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116626174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, K., Kremer, D., & Schlieder, C. (2015). Spatial collaboration networks of OpenStreetMap. In J. J. Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (Eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Experiences, research, and applications (pp. 167–186). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_9
   Google Scholar
• Stout, G. F. (1908). Immediacy, mediacy and coherence. Mind, 17(65), 20–47.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Falomir, Z., Freksa, C., Sheng, Y., & Lyu, H. (2020). Extracting invariant characteristics of sketch maps: Towards place query-by-sketch. Transactions in GIS, 24(4), 903–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., & Pred, A. (1981). Time-geography: A new beginning. Progress in Human Geography, 5(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258100500209
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000). ‘Social sharedness’ as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003002002
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touya, G., Antoniou, V., Olteanu-Raimond, A.-M., & van Damme, M.-D. (2017). Assessing crowdsourced POI quality: Combining methods based on reference data history, and spatial relations. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6030080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. (2018). Mapping society. The spatial dimensions of social cartography. London, UK: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787353053
   Google Scholar
• Witt, R., Loos, L., & Zipf, A. (2021). Analysing the impact of large data imports in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (1972). Human factors in cartographic communication. The Cartographic Journal, 9(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1179/00087041.9.2.p123
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. K. (1942). Map makers are human: Comments on the subjective in maps. The Geographical Review, 32(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.2307/209994
   Google Scholar
• Zielstra, D., Hochmair, H., & Neis, P. (2013). Assessing the effect of data imports on the completeness of OpenStreetMap. A United States case study. Transactions in GIS, 17(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar