A comparison of performance using extrinsic and intrinsic bivariate cartographic visualizations with respect to cognitive style in experienced map users

References

• Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A., Hatchard, G. W., & Harrower, M. A. (2003). ColorBrewer in print: A catalog of color schemes for maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304003100010929
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. W. (1986). Bivariate choropleth mapping: The effects of axis scaling. The American Cartographer, 13(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304086783900158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čeněk, J., Tsai, J. L., & Šašinka, Č. (2020). Cultural variations in global and local attention and eye-movement patterns during the perception of complex visual scenes: Comparison of Czech and Taiwanese university students. PLoS One, 15(11), e0242501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čeněk, J., Tsai, J.-L., Šašinka, Č., & Whitford, V. (2020). Cultural variations in global and local attention and eye-movement patterns during the perception of complex visual scenes: Comparison of Czech and Taiwanese university students. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0242501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (1993). Map design for census mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 30(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1993.30.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmer, M. E. (2012). Symbol considerations for bivariate thematic mapping. University of Winsconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Eyton, J. R. (1984). Complementary-color, two-variable maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01469.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, N. (1998). Visualization of an imperfect world. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(4), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.689662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haining, R. P. (1981). Analysing univariate maps. Progress in Human Geography, 5(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258100500104
   Google Scholar
• Havelková, L., & Hanus, M. (2018). The impact of the map type on the level of student map skills. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information & Geovisualization, 53(3), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.53.3.2017-0014
   Google Scholar
• Havelková, L., & Hanus, M. (2021). Upper-secondary students’ strategies for spatial tasks. Journal of Geography, 120(5), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1981979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, K. S., Claramunt, C., Denis, M., & Ligozat, G. (Eds). (2009). Spatial information theory. COSIT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5756. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
   Google Scholar
• Korycka-Skorupa, J., & Gołębiowska, I. (2021). Multivariate mapping for experienced users: Comparing extrinsic and intrinsic maps with univariate maps. Miscellanea Geographica, 25(4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubíček, P., Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Štěrba, Z., Apeltauer, J., & Urbánek, T. (2017). Cartographic design and usability of visual variables for linear features. The Cartographic Journal, 54(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1168141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacko, D., Prošek, T., Čeněk, J., Helísková, M., Ugwitz, P., Svoboda, V., Počaji, P., Vais, M., Halířová, H., Juřík, V., & Šašinka, Č. (2023). Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments. PloS One, 18(6), e0287057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacko, D., Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Lu, W., & Čeněk, J. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in cognitive style, individualism/collectivism and map reading between central European and east Asian university students. Studia Psychologica, 62(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2020.01.789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapon, L., Ooms, K., De Wit, B., Vanhaeren, N., & De Maeyer, P. (2020). People’s global-scale cognitive map versus their personal characteristics: A worldwide study. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 47(6), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2020.1809524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan, A., & Dubey, S. K. (2012). Usability evaluation methods: A literature review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4(2), 590–599.
   Google Scholar
• Mangiafico, S. S. (2016). Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.19.10. rcompanion.org/handbook/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R. (2007). Attribute blocks: Visualizing multiple continuously defined attributes. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 27(3), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2007.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. (2000). The impact of bivariate symbol design on task performance in a map setting. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 37(4), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.3138/V743-K505-5510-66Q5
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. S. (2000). Designing effective bivariate symbols: The influence of perceptual grouping processes. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304000783547786
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163–11170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934527100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opach, T., Popelka, S., Dolezalova, J., & Rød, J. K. (2018). Star and polyline glyphs in a grid plot and on a map display: Which perform better? Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(5), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1364169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., & Deary, I. J. (2006). Examining wholistic–analytic style using preferences in early information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka, S., Stachoň, Z., Šašinka, Č., & Doležalová, J. (2016). EyeTribe tracker data accuracy evaluation and its interconnection with hypothesis software for cartographic purposes. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9172506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A. R., & Katz, L. (2004). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00219-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezk, A. A., & Hendawy, M. (2023). Informative cartographic communication: A framework to evaluate the effects of map types on users’ interpretation of COVID-19 geovisualizations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2022.2155249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Kimerling, A. J., & Guptill, S. C. (2009). Elements of Cartography (6th ed.). John Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2012). Cartographic interaction primitives: Framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 376–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., Korpi, J., Lokka, I., Mendonça, A., Ooms, K., & van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. (2017). User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
   Google Scholar
• Šašinka, Č., Morong, K., & Stachoň, Z. (2017). The hypothesis platform: An online tool for experimental research into work with maps and behavior in electronic environments. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(12), 407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Čeněk, J., Šašinková, A., Popelka, S., Ugwitz, P., Lacko, D., & Gao, S. (2021). A comparison of the performance on extrinsic and intrinsic cartographic visualizations through correctness, response time and cognitive processing. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Kubíček, P., Tamm, S., Matas, A., & Kukaňová, M. (2019). The impact of global/local bias on task-solving in map-related tasks Employing extrinsic and intrinsic visualization of risk uncertainty maps. The Cartographic Journal, 56(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2017.1414018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., & Lu, Y. (2014). Detection of dynamic activity patterns at a collective level from large volume trajectory data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5), 946–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.869819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A. (1981). Analyzing the communicative efficiency of two-sectored pie graphs. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 18(3), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.3138/462R-12GP-G723-8033
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., Blok, C., Jiang, B., Koussoulakou, A., Montello, D. R., Fuhrmann, S., & Hedley, N. R. (2001). Cognitive and usability issues in Geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304001782173998
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2008). Thematic cartography and geovisualization (3rd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stachoň, Z., Šašinka, Č., Čeněk, J., Štěrba, Z., Angsuesser, S., Fabrikant, S. I., Štampach, R., & Morong, K. (2019). Cross-cultural differences in figure–ground perception of cartographic stimuli. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2018.1470575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strode, G., Mesev, V., Bleisch, S., Ziewitz, K., Reed, F., & Morgan, J. D. (2020). Exploratory bivariate and multivariate geovisualizations of a social vulnerability index. Cartographic Perspectives, 95, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP95.1569
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2022). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, E1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar