162
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A web-based geovisualization framework for exploratory analysis of individual VGI contributor’s participation characteristics

ORCID Icon
Received 06 Jan 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 15 Jan 2024

References

  • Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Jankowski, P., Keim, D., Kraak, M. J., MacEachren, A., & Wrobel, S. (2007). Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(8), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701349011
  • Aristeidou, M., Herodotou, C., Ballard, H. L., Higgins, L., Johnson, R. F., Miller, A. E., Young, A. N., & Robinson, L. D. (2021). How do young community and citizen science Volunteers support scientific research on biodiversity? The case of iNaturalist. Diversity, 13(7), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13070318
  • Aristeidou, M., Herodotou, C., Ballard, H. L., Young, A. N., Miller, A. E., Higgins, L., Johnson, R. F., & Lepczyk, C. A. (2021, January). Exploring the participation of young citizen scientists in scientific research: The case of iNaturalist. PLoS ONE, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245682
  • Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044
  • Arleo, A., Didimo, W., Liotta, G., Miksch, S., & Montecchiani, F. (2022). Influence maximization with visual analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(10), 3428–3440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3190623
  • August, T., Fox, R., Roy, D. B., & Pocock, M. J. O. (2020). Data-derived metrics describing the behaviour of field-based citizen scientists provide insights for project design and modelling bias. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67658-3
  • Bégin, D., Devillers, R., & Roche, S. (2018). The life cycle of contributors in collaborative online communities - the case of OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(8), 1611–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1458312
  • Boakes, E. H., Gliozzo, G., Seymour, V., Harvey, M., Smith, C., Roy, D. B., & Haklay, M. (2016). Patterns of contribution to citizen science biodiversity projects increase understanding of volunteers’ recording behaviour. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33051
  • Carron-Arthur, B., Cunningham, J. A., & Griffiths, K. M. (2014). Describing the distribution of engagement in an Internet support group by post frequency: A comparison of the 90-9-1 principle and Zipf’s law. Internet Interventions, 1(4), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2014.09.003
  • Chen, J., MacEachren, A. M., & Guo, D. (2008). Supporting the process of exploring and interpreting space-time multivariate patterns: The visual inquiry toolkit. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 35(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304008783475689
  • Chen, J., Roth, R. E., Naito, A. T., Lengerich, E. J., & MacEachren, A. M. (2008). Geovisual analytics to enhance spatial scan statistic interpretation: An analysis of U.S. cervical cancer mortality. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-57
  • Connors, J. P., Lei, S., & Kelly, M. (2012). Citizen science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6), 1267–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.627058
  • Cui, N., Malleson, N., Houlden, V., & Comber, A. (2021). Using VGI and social media data to understand urban green space: A narrative literature review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(7), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10070425
  • DiCecco, G. J., Barve, V., Belitz, M. W., Stucky, B. J., Guralnick, R. P., & Hurlbert, A. H. (2021). Observing the observers: How participants contribute data to iNaturalist and implications for biodiversity science. BioScience, 71(11), 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab093
  • eBird. (2021). eBird basic dataset metadata (v1.13).
  • Enguehard, R. A., Hoeber, O., & Devillers, R. (2013). Interactive exploration of movement data: A case study of geovisual analytics for fishing vessel analysis. Information Visualization, 12(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612456121
  • Facebook. (2022). eBird community discussion group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/288737854555183/?mibextid=6NoCDW
  • Fink, D., Auer, T., Johnston, A., Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Hochachka, W. M., & Kelling, S. (2020). Modeling avian full annual cycle distribution and population trends with citizen science data. Ecological Applications, 30(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2056
  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
  • Goodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012). Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
  • Guo, D., & Jin, H. (2011). Iredistrict: Geovisual analytics for redistricting optimization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 22(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.03.001
  • Haklay, M. (2016). Why is participation inequality important? In C. Capineri, M. Haklay, H. Huang, V. Antoniou, J. Kettunen, F. Ostermann, & R. Purves (Eds.), European handbook of crowdsourced geographic information (pp. 35–44). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bax
  • Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). OpenStreetMap: User-generated street maps. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 7(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
  • Hochachka, W. M., Alonso, H., Guti, C., Miller, E., & Johnston, A. (2021). Regional variation in the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quantity and quality of data collected by the project eBird. Biological Conservation, 254, 108974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108974
  • Huang, X., Li, Z., Jiang, Y., Li, X., Porter, D., & Gao, S. (2020). Twitter reveals human mobility dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS One, 15(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241957
  • iNaturalist. (2022a). Frequently asked questions. https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help#geoprivacy
  • iNaturalist. (2022b). iNaturalist observations. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations
  • iNaturalist. (2022c). iNaturalist observations export. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/export
  • Johnston, A., Hochachka, W. M., Strimas-Mackey, M. E., Ruiz Gutierrez, V., Robinson, O. J., Miller, E. T., Auer, T., Kelling, S. T., Fink, D., & Fourcade, Y. (2021). Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions. Diversity and Distributions, 27(7), 1265–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13271
  • Kelling, S., Lagoze, C., Wong, W.-K., Yu, J., Damoulas, T., Gerbracht, J., Fink, D., & Gomes, C. (2013). eBird: A human/Computer learning network to improve biodiversity Conservation and research. AI Magazine, 34(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i1.2431
  • Kishimoto, K., & Kobori, H. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic drives changes in participation in citizen science project “city nature challenge” in Tokyo. Biological Conservation, 255, 109001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109001
  • Kodinariya, T. M., & Makwana, P. R. (2013). Review on determining number of cluster in K-Means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 90–95.
  • Kraak, M.-J. (2003). Geovisualization illustrated. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57(5–6), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00167-3
  • Kraak, M. J. (2008). From geovisualisation toward geovisual analytics. Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X315183
  • Li, Z., Huang, X., Hu, T., Ning, H., Ye, X., Huang, B., Li, X., & Yang, C. (2021). ODT FLOW: A scalable platform for extracting, analyzing, and sharing multi-source multi-scale human mobility. PLoS ONE, 16(8), e0255259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255259
  • McCulloh, I., Armstrong, H., & Johnson, A. (2013). Social network analysis with applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Nakaya, T., & Yano, K. (2010). Visualising crime clusters in a space-time cube: An exploratory data-analysis approach using space-time kernel density estimation and scan statistics. Transactions in GIS, 14(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01194.x
  • Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2012). Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project - the case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020146
  • Nelson, J. K., Quinn, S., Swedberg, B., Chu, W., & MacEachren, A. M. (2015). Geovisual analytics approach to exploring public political discourse on twitter. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 337–366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4010337
  • O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
  • Ponciano, L., & Brasileiro, F. (2014). Finding volunteers’ engagement profiles in human computation for citizen science projects. Human Computation, 1(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v1i2.12
  • Quinn, S. (2016). A geolinguistic approach for comprehending local influence in OpenStreetMap. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 51(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.51.2.3301
  • Quinn, S. D., & MacEachren, A. M. (2018). A geovisual analytics exploration of the OpenStreetMap crowd. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1276479
  • Robinson, A. (2017). Geovisual analytics. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (3rd quarte, Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.3
  • Robinson, A. C., Peuquet, D. J., Pezanowski, S., Hardisty, F. A., & Swedberg, B. (2017). Design and evaluation of a geovisual analytics system for uncovering patterns in spatio-temporal event data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(3), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1139467
  • Roth, R. E., & MacEachren, A. M. (2016). Geovisual analytics and the science of interaction: An empirical interaction study. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1021714
  • Sarkar, D., & Anderson, J. T. (2022). Corporate editors in OpenStreetMap: Investigating co‐editing patterns. Transactions in GIS, 26(4), 1879–1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12910
  • Sauermanna, H., & Franzonib, C. (2015). Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(3), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408907112
  • Sbrocchi, C., Pecl, G., van Putten, I., & Roetman, P. (2022). A citizen science community of practice: Relational patterns contributing to shared practice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/CSTP.358
  • Sulla-Menashe, D., & Friedl, M. A. (2018). User Guide to Collection 6 MODIS Land Cover (MCD12Q1 and MCD12C1) Product. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/101/MCD12_User_Guide_V6.pdf
  • Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Iliff, M. J., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D., & Kelling, S. (2009). eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142(10), 2282–2292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006
  • Tomaszewski, B., & MacEachren, A. M. (2012). Geovisual analytics to support crisis management: Information foraging for geo-historical context. Information Visualization, 11(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612456122
  • Tupikina, L., Schlosser, F., Voskresenskii, V., Kloppenborg, K., Lopez, F., Mariz, A., Mogilevskaja, A., Haklay, M., & Tzovaras, B. G. (2021). iNaturalist citizen science community during city nature challenge: New computational approach for analysis of user activity. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 2112.02693.
  • Ueda, K. (2022). iNaturalist research-grade observations. iNaturalist.org. occurrence dataset. https://doi.org/10.15468/ab3s5x accessed via GBIF.org
  • Unger, S., Rollins, M., Tietz, A., & Dumais, H. (2021). iNaturalist as an engaging tool for identifying organisms in outdoor activities. Journal of Biological Education, 55(5), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1739114
  • Van Ho, Q., Lundblad, P., Aström, T., & Jern, M. (2012). A web-enabled visualization toolkit for geovisual analytics. Information Visualization, 11(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611425870
  • Wang, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., & Sun, L. (2019). Urban human mobility: Data-driven modeling and prediction. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331651.3331653
  • Wang, Z., & Ye, X. (2018). Social media analytics for natural disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1367003
  • White, J. J., & Roth, R. E. (2010, September 15). TwitterHitter: Geovisual analytics for harvesting insight from volunteered geographic information. Proceedings of GIScience Zurich, Switzerland, (Vol. 2010).
  • Xin, Y. (2022). Anomaly detection for volunteered geographic information: A case study of safecast data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(7), 1423–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.1981333
  • Yan, Y., Feng, C., Huang, W., Fan, H., Wang, Y., & Zipf, A. (2020). Volunteered geographic information research in the first decade: A narrative review of selected journal articles in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(9), 1765–1791. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1730848
  • Zhang, G. (2020). Spatial and temporal patterns in volunteer data contribution activities: A case study of eBird. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(10), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100597
  • Zhang, G. (2021). Volunteered geographic information. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (1st quarte). https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2021.1.1
  • Zhang, G. (2022). Detecting and visualizing observation hot-spots in massive volunteer-contributed geographic data across spatial scales using GPU-accelerated kernel density estimation. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010055
  • Zhang, T., Wang, J., Cui, C., Li, Y., He, W., Lu, Y., & Qiao, Q. (2019). Integrating geovisual analytics with machine learning for human mobility pattern discovery. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(10), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8100434
  • Zhang, G., & Zhu, A.-X. (2018). The representativeness and spatial bias of volunteered geographic information: A review. Annals of GIS, 24(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2018.1501607
  • Zhang, G., & Zhu, A.-X. (2019a). A representativeness directed approach to spatial bias mitigation in VGI for predictive mapping. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33(9), 1873–1893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1615071
  • Zhang, G., & Zhu, A.-X. (2019b). A representativeness heuristic for mitigating spatial bias in existing soil samples for digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 351(May), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.024
  • Zhang, G., Zhu, A.-X., Huang, Z.-P., Ren, G., Qin, C.-Z., & Xiao, W. (2018). Validity of historical volunteered geographic information: Evaluating citizen data for mapping historical geographic phenomena. Transactions in GIS, 22(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12300
  • Zhang, G., Zhu, A.-X., Huang, Z.-P., & Xiao, W. (2018). A heuristic-based approach to mitigating positional errors in patrol data for species distribution modeling. Transactions in GIS, 22(1), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12303
  • Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1948-4682.1069

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.