50
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward a Signature Pedagogy for Public Administration

Pages 145-160 | Published online: 13 Apr 2018

References

  • Abel, C., & Herzog, R. (2007). Rational techniques as myth-based rituals: The role of reflective practitioners in remunerative justice. Jorunal of Public Personnel Management, forthcoming.
  • Abel, C., & Sementelli, A. (2003). Evolutionary critical theory and its role in public affairs. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe Publishers.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston.
  • Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Hilgard, E. R. (1990). Introduction to Psychology (10th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt.
  • Berk, R. (1996). Student ratings of 10 strategies for using humor in college teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 7(3), 71–92.
  • Box, R. (1992). An examination of the debate over research in public administration. Public Administration Review. 52, 62–69.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research, 18, 32–42.
  • Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
  • Chory, R. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1), 1–11.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Dodge, B., & Rossett, A. (1982). Heuristic for humor in instruction. NSPI Journal, 5, 11–14.
  • Forrester, J. (1996). Knowledge and theory development in public administration: The role of doctoral education and research. Public Administration Review, 56, 441–452.
  • Frederiksen, J., & White, B. (2002). Conceptualizing and constructing linked models: Creating coherence in complex knowledge systems. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The role of communication in learning to model (pp. 69–96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Glenn, R. (2002). Brain research: Practical applications for the classroom. Teaching for Excellence, 21(6), 1–20.
  • Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1995). Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 249–279.
  • Gunnell, J. G. (1997). Why there cannot be a theory of politics. Polity, 29(4), 519–538.
  • Hebdige, D. (1979). The meaning of style. London: Routledge.
  • Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U. S. 458 (1983).
  • Johnson, B. (1980). The critical difference: Essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14.
  • Kearney, P. (1994). Affective learning. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 81–85). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Korobkin, D. (1989). Humor in the classroom: Considerations and strategies. College Teaching, 36(4), 154–58.
  • Larkin, J. (1983) The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C., & Hilt, C. J. (1999.) The empirical study of governance: Theories, models, methods. Paper presented at the Workshop on Models and Methods for the Empirical Study of Governance, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. In J. E. Jreisat, Governance and developing countries. (p.15). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers.
  • Madden, E. (2002). Immersive pedagogies, or ‘Can you feel it, Joe?’ Paper presented at the Centre for Rhetorics and Hermeneutics. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://rhetjournal.net/EdMadden.pdf
  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
  • Marini, F. (1971). Toward a new public administration. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Co.
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–43.
  • Peters, T. (1997). The circle of innovation. New York: Knopf.
  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
  • Rutgers, M. (1998), Paradigm lost: Crisis as identity of the study of public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64(4), 553–564.
  • Saettler, L. P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Salzman, M., Dede, C., Loftin, C., Bowen, R., & Sprague, D. (1997, September). Assessing virtual reality’s potential for teaching abstract science. Proceedings of the human factors society. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/1998/B/299801296/html.
  • Shields, C., & Gredler, M. (2003). A problem-solving approach to teaching operant conditioning. Teaching Psychology, 30(2), 114–116.
  • Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436.
  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
  • Story, K., & Horner, R. (1988). Pre-task requests help manage behavior problems. Direct Instruction News, 7(2), 1–3.
  • Strauss, S. (1996). Confessions of a born-again constructivist. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 15–21.
  • West, T. G. (1991). In the mind’s eye: Visual thinkers, gifted people with learning difficulties, computer images, and the ironies of creativity. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
  • White, J., Adams, G., & Forrester, J. (1996). Knowledge and theory development in public administration: The role of doctoral education and research. Public Administration Review, 56(44), 1–52.
  • Wilber, C. K., & Harrison, R. S. (1978). The methodological basis of institutional economics: Pattern model, storytelling, and holism. Journal of Economic Issues, 12(1), 61–89.
  • Willis, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Wisman, J. D., & Rozansky J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(3), 709–738.
  • Yates, D. (1981). Hard choices: Justifying bureaucratic decisions. In J. L. Fleishman, L. Liebman, & M. H. Moore. (Eds.), Public duties: The moral obligations of government officials (pp. 32–51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ziv, A. (1983). The influence of humorous atmosphere on divergent thinking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1), 68–75.
  • Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replications. Journal of Experimental Education, 6(1), 37–44.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.