Trees and Water: Mainstreaming Environment in the Graduate Policy Analysis Curriculum

References

• Apthorpe, R., & Gasper, D. (Eds.). (1996). Arguing development policy. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Bain, J. (1995). Enhancing environmental conceptions: An evaluation of cognitive conflict and structured controversy learning units. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, G.-M., Matusitz, J., & Wan, T. T. H. (2009). Applying student-centered learning concepts to a doctoral, introductory, interdisciplinary public affairs course. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(1), 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Corney, G. (1998). Learning to teach environmental issues. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 7(2), 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1995). Parallel thinking. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. N. (2008). Public policy analysis: An introduction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, D. (2004). Autonomy-respecting assistance: Toward an alternative theory of development assistance. Review of Social Economy, 62(2), 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, D. (2005). Helping people to help themselves. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1991). The moral dimension in policy analysis. In R. Coughlin (Ed.), Morality, rationality, and efficiency (pp. 375–386). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (1996). Analysing policy arguments. In R. Apthorpe & D. Gasper (Eds.), European Journal of Development Research (pp. 36–62). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2000). Structures and meanings—A way to introduce argumentation analysis in policy studies education. Africanus, 30(1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2002). Fashion, learning, and values in public management: Reflections on South African and international experience, Africa Development, 27(3), 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2006). Policy evaluation—From managerialism and econocracy to a governance perspective. In A. S. Huque & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International development governance (pp. 655–670). New York: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D., & George, R. V. (1998). Analyzing argumentation in planning and public policy: Assessing, improving and transcending the Toulmin model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(3), 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Goberts, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effect of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (1), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D. (2008). Problem-based learning in the MPA curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Ensor, J. (Eds.). (2005). Reinventing development—Translating rights-based approaches from theory into practice. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, R. S. (1974). A guide for the analysis of policy arguments. Policy Sciences, 5(4), 469–478.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. E. (2009). Putting yourself in their shoes: The analysis of real-world disputes through group field projects. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(4), 535–552.
   Google Scholar
• Hoksbergen, R. (1986). Approaches to evaluation of development interventions—The importance of world and life views. World Development, 14(2), 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. (2007). How might action learning be used to develop the emotional intelligence and leadership capacity of public administrators? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 205–242.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. (2008). Discussion report: Pedagogy for policy analysis and management, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 1045–1049.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, M. (2008). Pedagogy for policy analysis and management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 1030–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Portmann, M., & Easterbrook, S. (1992). PMI: Knowledge elicitation and De Bono’s thinking tools. In Current developments in knowledge acquisition—EKAW ’92. Berlin: Springer, 264–282.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer, D., & Kelly, Gregory. (2005). An investigation of student engagement in a global warming debate. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (2006). Ethical dimensions of public policy. In M. Moran et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (chap. 35).
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., & Thompson, M. (Eds.). (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (1990). Implementing policy reforms in LDCs—A strategy for designing and effecting change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar