The Impact of Simulations on Higher-Level Learning

References

• Alder, M. J. (1982). The Paideia Proposal: An education manifesto. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. H., & Lawton, L. (2009). Business simulations and cognitive learning. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. L., & Meizlish, D. S. (2003). Becoming Congress: A longitudinal study of the civic engagement implications of a classroom simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 34(2): 198–219.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, L. A., & Donahue, A. K. (2007). Teaching leadership in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(3/4): 461–485.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C. (1996). Enhancing the lecture: Revitalizing a traditional format. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1996 (67): 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, K. L., & Cameron, B. J. (1999). Enlivening Science Courses with Kolb’s Learning Preference Model. PS: Political Science & Politics, 32, 251–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (1990). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. E., & McCabe, B. C. (2002). Fun with economics: Simulating theory to stimulate learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(2), 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Caruson, K. (2005). So, you want to run for elected office? How to engage students in the campaign process without leaving the classroom. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(2), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, P., & Machemer, P. L. (2008). Measuring incidental learning in a PBL environment. Journal of Faculty Development, 22(2): 104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2007). Teaching leadership and policy change in a public affairs school. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2): 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching. Second edition of The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, M. J. (2002). Building a public personnel system for the City of Freedonia: A new approach to teaching human resources management in an MPA program. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(4): 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, B. K. (2003). Byzantine politics: Using simulations to make sense of the Middle East. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2): 239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J., & Wellington, W. J. (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former-users, and neverusers. Simulation & Gaming, 35(2), 178–207. doi: 10.1177/1046878104263543
   Google Scholar
• Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fliter, J. (2009). Incorporating a sophisticated Supreme Court simulation into an undergraduate constitutional law class. Journal of Political Science Education, 5(1), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, T., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Methodological and theoretical considerations in survey research. Leadership Quarterly, 20(57–60).
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. (2004). A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 35(2), 270–293.
   Google Scholar
• Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Kanner, M. D. (2007). War and peace: Simulating security decision making in the classroom. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(04), 795–800.
   Google Scholar
• Killian, L. J., & Brandon, C. D. (2009). Using the significant learning taxonomy and active learning to improve accounting education. Journal of Faculty Development, 23(3), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kirlin, M. (2005). Understanding the relationship between civic skills and civic participation: Educating future public managers. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(4), 305–314.
   Google Scholar
• Krain, M., & Lantis, J. S. (2006). Building knowledge? Evaluating the effectiveness of the Global Problems Summit Simulation. International Studies Perspectives, 7, 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J., & Marilla, S. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. D. (2009). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, E. A. (2007). Competency-based educational models for electronic governance: Implications for inclusion and responsiveness in the public service. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R. (2002). Advice to new teachers: Turn it inside out. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(1), 91–92.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poling, D. A., & Hupp, J. M. (2009). Active learning through role playing. College Teaching, 57(4), 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Powner, L. C., & Allendoerfer, M. G. (2008). Evaluating hypotheses about active learning. International Studies Perspectives, 9(1), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raines, S. S. (2003). The ISP Forum: Dialogue and debate (Vol. 4, pp. 432–433). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rochester, J. M. (2003). The ISP Forum: Dialogue and debate (Vol. 4, pp. 433–435). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, S. M. (2001). Active learning in comparative politics: A mock German election and coalition-formation simulation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34(4), 827–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellman, S. M., & Turan, K. (2006). Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. T., & Boyer, M. A. (1996). Designing in-class simulations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29(4), 690–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, B., & Baker, D. L. (2004). Going camping: A new strategy for preparing academically diverse students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(1), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, J., Gump, W. R., & Forrester, J. R. (2005). Camelot: A role-playing simulation for political decision making (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghi, A. (2008). Using Petra Simulation in teaching graduate courses in human resource management: A hybrid pedagogy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(3), 399–412.
   Google Scholar