Social Networking, Learning, and Civic Engagement: New Relationships between Professors and Students, Public Administrators and Citizens

References

• Bachrach, P., & Botwinick, A. (1992). Power and empowerment: A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, K., R. Marateo, & S. Ferris. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4).
   Google Scholar
• Bogason, P., Kensen, S., & Miller, H. T. (2004). Pragmatic, extra-formal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 675–692.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2007). Social network sites: Public, private, or what? The Knowledge Tree, 13. Retrieved from http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?page_id528
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. (2011). Virtual government-citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration & Society, 42, 836–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A., & Chen, B. (2010). Social networking in teaching public administration. In Charles Wankel (Ed.), Cutting-edge social media approaches to business education: Teaching with LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Second Life, and Blogs (pp. 241–267). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A., & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social media and public administration: Theoretical dimensions and introduction to the symposium. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, J. (2008). Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvin, A. (n.d.). Social networking in education. Slideshow. Retrieved from http://www.andycarvin.com/?p=1665
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Catlaw, T. J. (2006). Authority, Representation, and the contradictions of post-traditional governing. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 261–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Evans-Cowley, J. S. (2006). E-participation in planning: An analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation. Environment and Planning C, 24, 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Gordon, S. I. (2004). Utility of interactive computer-based materials for enhancing public participation. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 47, 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B., & Orehovec, E. (2007). Faculty-student interaction outside the classroom: A typology from a residential college. Review of Higher Education, 30, 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Digital Divide. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.onlineitdegree.net/digital-divide/
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Accounting Education, 12, 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M., Blaszak, E. N., Buettner, S. L., Morrissette, B. A., & Redden, R. J. (2009). Improving quality and creating democracy in the classroom? Using student management teams. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31, 119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2006, June 19–23). Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital: The role of Facebook. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, J. (2005). Why some social network services work and others don’t—Or: the case for object-centered sociality. Retrieved from http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why_some_social-network-services-work-and-others-dont-or-the-case-for-object-centered-sociality.html
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice & Research, 25, 397–408.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. (1999). The class as case: “Reinventing” the classroom. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 482–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M. (2010, January 30). A world of connections. The Economist, 394(8667), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, J. M. (2000). Teaching the Net generation. Business Education Forum, 54(3), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Halawah, I. (2006). The impact of student-faculty informal interpersonal relationships on intellectual and personal development. College Student Journal. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCR/is_3_40/ai_n16726402/pg_6/?tag=content;col1
   Google Scholar
• Hand, L. C., & Ching, B. D. (2011). “You have one friend request”: An exploration of power and citizen engagement in local governments’ use of social media. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33, 362–382.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, L. (2011). Mashing up the institution: Teacher as bricoleur. Radical Teacher, 90(1), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (2000). Threats to public workplace democracy. Peace Review, 12, 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, L. E. (2000). Educating the Net generation. Social Administrator, 57(54), 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006, November 4–8). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Paper presented at CSCW’06, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolowich, S. (2010, May 4). Professors and social media. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/04/socialmedia
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24, 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, J., & Perini, M. (2010). Potential of social networking sites for distance education student engagement. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2010(150), 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, S., Bulanda, R. E., & Wagenaar, T. C. (2009). Student entitlement: Issues and strategies for confronting entitlement in the classroom and beyond. College Teaching, 57, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M., & Zickuhr, K. (2011, August 26). 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP-SNS-Update-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. S. (2007). Commanded to enjoy: The waning of traditional authority and its implications for public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 29, 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McSwite, O. C. (2009). The challenge of social networks. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31, 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2012.). The public manager 2.0: Preparing the social media generation for a networked workplace. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3).
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2010, September 21). Social media: Digital divide, digital access and digital literacy. Social Media in the Public Sector blog. Retrieved from http://inesmergel.wordpress.com/2010/09/21/social-media-digital-divide-digital-access-and-digital-literacy/
   Google Scholar
• Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2001). Distance learning on the Internet: An exploratory study. Internet and Higher Education, 2, 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1996). Democracy, power, and the political. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 245–256). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S., Martin, M., & Knapp, J. (2005). Perceived instructor in-class communicative behaviors as a predictor of student participation in out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 53, 437–450.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government. How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L., Eds. (2005). Educating the Net generation. Washington, D.C.: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/books/educatingthenetgen/5989
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R. (1997). The great man theory of teaching is dead. Journal of Public Administration Education, 3(2), 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ophus, J. D., & Abbitt, J. T. (2009). Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5, 639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me Mom—I’m learning. Minneapolis, MN: Paragon House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Radovanovic, D. (2011). Digital divide and social media: Connectivity doesn’t end the digital divide, skills do. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/12/14/digital-divide-and-social-media-connectivity-doesnt-end-the-digital-divide-skills-do/
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1–47). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2009, February 2). Fasting growing demographic on Facebook: Women over 55. Inside Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/02/fastest-growingdemographic-on-facebook-women-over-55/
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, S. (2009). The effectiveness of blended learning environments for the delivery of respiratory care education. Journal of Allied Health, 38, e11–e16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Proceedings of the 2006 iDMAa and IMS Code Conference, Oxford, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, K., & Kouzmin, A. (2008). Cyberpunk-Web 1.0 “egoism” greets group-Web 2.0 “narcissism”: Convergence, consumption, and surveillance in the digital divide. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30, 299–323.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A. & Berman, J. (2003) Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public, Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhusen, G. C. (2010). Challenges in federal agencies’ use of Web 2.0 technologies. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10872t.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., & Whitelock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computermediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? Computers and Education, 30, 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar