Strategies Outside the Formal Classroom: Nonprofit Management Education in Transparency and Accountability

References

• Abramson, A. J., & McCarthy, R. (2012). Infrastructure organizations. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Aportes Ciudadanos a las Regulaciones de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil del Ecuador. (2009, August 3). [Citizen contributions to the regulations of civil society organizations in Ecuador]. Quito, Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Appe, S. (2011). Civil society mappings by government: A comparison of Ecuadorian and Colombian cases. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 157–178.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A. (2011). Situación de la transparencia y rendición de cuentas en las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales (ONG) del Ecuador [The situation of transparency and accountability in Ecuadorian nongovernmental organizations]. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA).
   Google Scholar
• Barragán, D. (2010). Rendición de cuentas: De la transparencia a la legitimidad social [Accountability: From transparency to social legitimacy]. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA). Retrieved from http://lasociedadcivil.org/docs/ciberteca/CEDAanalisis_No11_marzo_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barragán, D. (2011). Informe de sistematización del proyecto “Hacia una gobernabilidad transparente: Fortaleciendo la transparencia y rendición de cuentas de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil” (unpublished) [Report of the project “Toward a transparent governance: Strengthening the transparency and accountability of civil society organizations”]. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA).
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., Hickey, S., & Mitlin, D. C. (2008). Introduction: Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives. In A. Bebbington, S. Hickey, & D. C. Mitlin (Eds.), Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives (pp. 3–37). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Benavides, A. D. (2006). Transparency and public administration in Mexico: How the enactment of a law is changing culture. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(4), 461–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, A. L. (2010). Evolution of nonprofit self-regulation in Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(6), 1057–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, A., & Blackwood, A. (2007). Accountability, ethics, evaluation, and governance in nonprofit management education: Trends and treatment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(3/4), 519–547.
   Google Scholar
• Boris, E. T. (2006). Nonprofit organizations in a democracy: Varied roles and responsibilities. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 399–435). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bothwell, R. O. (2001). Trends in self-regulation and transparency of nonprofits in the U. S. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 2(3), 604–622.
   Google Scholar
• Brautigam, D. A., & Segarra, M. (2007). Difficult partnerships: The World Bank, states, and NGOs. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4), 149–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysk, A. (2000). Democratizing civil society in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 11(3), 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, D. E. (2009). Nonprofit and philanthropic studies education: The need to emphasize leadership and liberal arts. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(1), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. C., & Vallejo, E. P. (1997). El mito al debate: Las ONGs en Ecuador [The myth of the debate: NGOs in Ecuador]. Quito, Ecuador: Alya-Yala Editing.
   Google Scholar
• Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA). (n.d.). Evaluación taller de capacitación a capacitadores sobre Ley Orgánica de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública [Workshop evaluation of the training to trainers about the Organic Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information—LOTAIP]. Quito, Ecuador: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Collective of Civil Society Organizations of Ecuador. (2011). Informe de rendición colectiva de cuentas 2010 [Report of collective accountability 2010]. Document on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Collective of Civil Society Organizations of Ecuador. (2012). Informe rendicion de cuentas 2011 [Report of accountability 2011]. Retrieved from http://rendircuentas.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/InformeOSC2011-1_ecuador.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dagnino, E. (2008). Challenges to participation, citizenship and democracy: perverse confluence and displacement of meanings. In A. Bebbington, S. Hickey, & D. C. Mitlin (Eds.), Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives (pp. 55–70). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R., Libby, P., McDonald, M., and Deitrick, L. (2012). Bridging the theory–practice gap in a nonprofit and philanthropic studies master’s degree program. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23, 93–104. doi:10.1002/nml.21055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003a). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003b). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Estévez, L. (2011). Organizaciones de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana Piden a Gobiernos que no Promulgue Reglamento [Ecuadorian organizations ask governments not to pass the regulation]. Press release.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2005). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcés, M. F. (2010, September). Marco normativo para las organizaciones de la sociedad civil [Legal framework for civil society organizations]. Presentation given to the Collective of Civil Society Organizations at Citizen Participation, Quito, Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo Legal Trade. (2009, September). Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en la legislación Ecuatoriana [Civil society organizations in Ecuadorian law]. Quito, Ecuador: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M. K. (2008). The effectiveness of NGO Self-regulation: Theory and evidence from Africa. Public Administration & Development, 28(2), 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M. K. (2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 243–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M. K., & Prakash, A. (2010). Introduction. In M. K. Gugerty & A. Prakash (Eds.), Voluntary regulation of NGOs and nonprofits: An accountability club framework (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, V. (Ed.). (2007). CIVICUS global survey of the state of civil society, Volume 1. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hejka-Ekins, A. (1988). Teaching ethics in public administration. Public Administration Review, 48(5), 885–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL). (2006). Recent laws and legislative proposals to restrict civil society and civil society organizations. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(4), 76–78.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL). (2009). Barred from the debate: Restrictions on NGO public policy. Global Trends in NGO Law, 1(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2009). A critical cross-cultural perspective for developing nonprofit international management capacity. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19, 443–466. doi:10.1002/nml.231
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (2001). The management of non-governmental development organizations: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, J. M. (1998). Law versus ethics: Reconciling two concepts of public service. Administration and Society, 29, 690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology, 82 (6): 1212–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, D. C. (1997). Teaching ethics and values: A survey of graduate public affairs and administration programs in the U. S. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(3), 518–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Coordination of Social Development. (2008). Información para las organizaciones de la sociedad civil a ser difundida a través del registro único de organizaciones de la sociedad civil [Information for civil society organization to be diffused through the registry of civil society organizations]. Document on file with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabella, R. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4, Suppl.), 11S–27S.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabella, R. M., Gemelli, G., Malcolm, M.-J., & Berger, G. (2007). Nonprofit and philanthropic studies: International overview of the field in Africa, Canada, Latin America, Asia, the Pacific, and Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4, Suppl.), 110S–135S.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabella, R., & Young, D. R. (2012). The development of education for social entrepreneurship and nonprofit management: Diverging or converging paths? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23, 43–57. doi:10.1002/nml.21049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najam, A. (1996). NGO Accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14, 339–354.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2005). Developmental contexts of nonprofit management education. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16, 5–17. doi:10.1002/nml.87
   Google Scholar
• OSC Ecuador. (2011, January 4). Manifesto del Colectivo de Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil [Manifest of the Collective of Civil Society Organizations]. Quito, Ecuador: OSC Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2010). Trust but verify? Voluntary regulation programs in the nonprofit sector. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 22–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidencia de la República del Ecuador [The Office of the President]. (2008, March 25). Executive Decree No. 982. Retrieved from http://decretos.cege.gob.ec/decretos/decretos.aspx?id=2007
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., Jones, P., & Frothling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutzen, D., & Shea, C. (2006). The associational counter-revolution. Alliance, 4(3), 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2000). The influence of the legal environment on the development of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore: John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, H. (2010). La sociedad civil bajo la lupa [Civil society under scrutiny]. Presentation, Quito, Ecuador. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/videoconferencias/organizacin-de-la-sociedadcivil-y-trabajo-en-redmgs-humberto-salazar
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H. P., Raggo. P., & Bruno-van Vijfeijken, T. (2013). Accountability of transnational NGOs: Aspirations vs. practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 324–345. doi:10.1177/0899764011431165
   Google Scholar
• Sidel, M. (2005). The guardians guarding themselves: A comparative perspective on self-regulation. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 80, 803–835.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2007). The research practices and needs of non-profit organizations in an urban center. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34(4), 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Unda, M., Guerrero, J., & Hidrovo, D. (2005). Luces y sombras. Voces y miradas sobre la sociedad civil en el Ecuador de hoy [Light and shade. Voices and looks about civil society in Ecuador today]. Quito, Ecuador: CIUDAD, Centro de Investigaciones.
   Google Scholar
• Vakil, A. C. (1997) Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Development, 25(11), 2057–2070.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, K. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building initiatives: Seven issues for the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wish, N. B., & Mirabella, R. M. (1998). Curricular variations in nonprofit management graduate programs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 99–110. doi:10.1002/nml.9108
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Wendy (2012). Internal affairs: How the structure of NGOs transforms human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2005). Issues and options for improving engagement between the World Bank and civil society organizations. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2007). Civil society’s role in the governance agenda in Ecuador: Assessing opportunities and constraints. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Worthley, J. A., & Grumet, B. R. (1983). Ethics and public administration: Teaching what “can’t be taught.” American Review of Public Administration, 17, 54. doi:10.1177/027507408301700106
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., & He, J. (2009). Paradigm shift in public administration: Implications for teaching in professional training programs. Public Administration Review, 69, S21–S28. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R., & Grinsfelder, M. C. (2011). Social entrepreneurship and the financing of third sector organizations. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(4), 543–567.
   Google Scholar