Cruel to Be Kind: A Neopragmatist Approach to Teaching Statistics for Public Administration Students

References

• Abellanosa, R. (2010). Rorty’s philosophy of education: Between orthodoxy and vulgar relativism. Kritike, 4(2), 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Abelson, R. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Adenay, K. & Carey, S. (2011). How to teach the reluctant and terrified to love statistics: The importance of context in teaching quantitative methods in the social sciences. In G. Payne & M. Williams, (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods (pp. 85–98). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. (2003). Don’t be cruel: Reflections on Rortian liberalism. In C. Guignon and D. Hiley (Eds.), Richard Rorty (pp. 139–157). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. Public Policy, 1(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, J. (2000). What are our goals in teaching research methods to public administrators? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(1), 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, D. (2003). The neopragmatist turn. Southwest Philosophy Review, 19(1), 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. (2000). The philosophy of statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 49, 293–337.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G. & Williams, M. (Eds.). (2011). Teaching quantitative methods. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. (1990). ‘Student.’ Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, UK: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, J. (1984). Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. & Martinez-Moyano, I. (2012). Techniques in teaching statistics: Linking research production and research use. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 107–136.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, O. (1997). Conducting socially responsible research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tishkovskaya, S., & Lancaster, G. (2012). Statistical education in the 21st century: A review of challenges, teaching innovations and strategies for reform [Online]. Journal of Statistics Education, 20(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v20n2/tishkovskaya.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.) (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., Alt, S., Dupuis, D., Holleque, K., & Chang, B. (2008). What does research suggest about the teaching and learning of introductory statistics at the college level? A review of the literature [Online]. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n2/zieffler.html
   Google Scholar