Quiet voices: Misalignment of the three Cs in public administration curriculum

References

• Atchison, A. L. (2016). Bringing women in: Gender mainstreaming in introduction to political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(3), 546–549. doi:10.1017/S1049096516000950
   Google Scholar
• Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 534–556. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Chandler, J., & Berg, E. (2007). Women’s movements and new public management: Higher education in Sweden and England. Public Administration, 85(1), 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearfield, D. A. (2009). Equity at the intersection: Public administration and the study of gender. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 383–386. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). Gender disparity in professional city management: Making the case for enhancing leadership curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 617–632.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, E., Boydstun, A., Dionne, K. Y., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Michelson, M., … Wolbrecht, C. (2016, February 11). Here’s a list of smart women political scientists. They know stuff, too. The Washington Post Monkey Cage. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/02/11/heres-a-list-of-smart-women-political-scientists-they-know-stuff-too/
   Google Scholar
• Blessett, B., Gaynor, T. S., Witt, M., & Alkadry, M. G. (2016). Counternarratives as critical perspectives in public administration curricula. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(4), 267–284. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1239397
   Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2003a). Giving voice to gender in the MPA classroom: Teaching organization theory with a gender emphasis. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4), 275–283.
   Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2003b). Other voices/other rooms: Towards a care-centered public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25(4), 529–544. doi:10.1080/10841806.2003.11029423
   Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B. K., Jacobson, W. S., Lambright, K. T., Llorens, J. J., Morse, R. S., & Poocharoen, O. O. (2011). Crossing the divide: Building bridges between public administration practitioners and scholars. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 1), i99–i112. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq063
   Google Scholar
• Carrizales, T. (2010). Exploring cultural competency within the public affairs curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(4), 593–606.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. (2017). Gender bias in international relations graduate education? New evidence from syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 456–460. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, D. M., & Hutchinson, J. R. (1997). Women in public administration: Extending the metaphor of the emperor’s new clothes. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 181–197. doi:10.1177/027507409702700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration, 88(3), 627–648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, M. J. (2017). Changing the narrative: The difference women make in Public Administration. Administration & Society, 49(1), 9–19. doi:10.1177/0095399716641986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, M. J., & Levine, H. (Eds.). (2011). Women in public administration: Theory and practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(91), 195–210. doi:10.1162/003465304323023750
   Google Scholar
• Derthick, M. (1987). American federalism: Madison’s middle ground in the 1980s. Public Administration Review, 47(1), 66–74. doi:10.2307/975473
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. (2000). The senior executive service: Gender, attitudes, and representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3), 513–530. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024279
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & List, C. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. doi:10.1017/S0007123403000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B., & Winters, M. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (2012). Theorizing in perspective: Epistemic pluralism. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(2), 180–190. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806340201
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, N. A. (2013). Toward publicly responsive sociology curricula: The role of introductory sociology. Teaching Sociology, 41(3), 232–241. doi:10.1177/0092055X13485026
   Google Scholar
• Hewins-Maroney, B., & Williams, E. (2007). Teaching diversity in public administration: A missing component? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R. (2014). Women in politics in the American city. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R. (2016). Gender, political rhetoric, and moral metaphors in State of the City addresses. Urban Affairs Review, 52(4), 501–530. doi:10.1177/1078087415589191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. R., & Mann, H. S. (2004). Feminist praxis: Administering for a multicultural, multigendered public. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(1), 79–95. doi:10.1080/10841806.2004.11029429
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. S. (1998). Requiring battered women die: Murder liability for mothers under failure to protect statutes. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(2), 579–660. doi:10.2307/1144291
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, J. (2013). Harvard Business School case study: Gender equity. New York Times, 8, 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B. (2014). Unraveling representative bureaucracy: A systematic analysis of the literature. Administration & Society, 46(4), 395–421. doi:10.1177/0095399712459724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, H., & D’Agostino, M. J. (2011). Concluding remarks. In M. J. D’Agostino & H. Levine (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 309–310). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Littleton, V., & Blessett, B. (2015). A framework for integrating cultural competency into the curriculum of public administration programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(4), 557–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, F. (2016). Heart, head, and hands: Intercultural, experiential, and applied gender learning in a peace studies department. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(3), 566–570.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., & Newman, M. A. (2002). What are we teaching about gender issues in public affairs courses? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(1), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• NASPAA. (2016). NASPAA annual accreditation data report 2014–2015. Retrieved from https://naspaaaccreditation.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/2014-15-data-report-final1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1995). C9495_A Awards/degrees conferred by program (6-digit CIP code), award level, race/ ethnicity,and gender: 1994-95. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/DataFiles.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2015). C2015_A Awards/degrees conferred by program (6-digit CIP code), award level, race/ ethnicity,and gender: July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/DataFiles.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Norman-Major, K. (2011). Balancing the four Es; Or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(2), 233–252.
   Google Scholar
• Norman-Major, K. A., & Gooden, S. T. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural competency for public administrators. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., & Dodge, J. (2005). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practitioners and academics developing public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 409–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantoja, A. D., & Segura, G. M. (2003). Does ethnicity matter? Descriptive representation in legislatures and political alienation among Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 441–460. doi:10.1111/ssqu.2003.84.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. F. (2004). Organizational culture, social equity, and diversity: Teaching public administration education in the postmodern era. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. E. (2012). Assessing diversity in public affairs curricula: A multi-methodological model for student-led programmatic self-study. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 757–774.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. (2013). Productivity and leadership patterns of female faculty members in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(1), 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M., Hijal-Moghrabi, I., & Royster, M. (2014). Preparing future public servants: Role of diversity in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 206–245.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon & O. V. Elliott (Eds.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1–47). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D., & Johnson, III, R. G. (2011). Symposium: Social equity as a tool for social change [Special issue]. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(2), 163–308.
   Google Scholar
• Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2016). Classics of public administration (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P. M. (2005). Classical pragmatism: Roots and promise for a PA feminist theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 370–376. doi:10.1080/10841806.2006.11029540
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P. M. (2006). Democracy and the social feminist ethics of Jane Addams: A vision for public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(3), 418–443.
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (1991). Toward a feminist perspective in public administration theory. Women & Politics, 10(4), 49–65. doi:10.1080/1554477X.1990.9970587
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (1995). Settlement women and bureau men: Constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 522–529. doi:10.2307/3110343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. M. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, N. A., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2009). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 409–426. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. News and World Report. (2012). Best grad school rankings: Public affairs. Retrieved from http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-public-affairs-schools/public-affairs-rankings
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S. K., & Arsneault, S. (2015). A core issue: The inseparable relationship between nonprofits and public policy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(3), 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, M. H. (2006). Writing what’s relevant: Workplace incivility in public administration – A wolf in sheep’s clothing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(1), 69–88. doi:10.1080/10841806.2006.11029525
   Google Scholar
• Waite, L. J., & Howe, M. J. K. (2008). The family. In P. H. Schuck & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Understanding America: The anatomy of an exceptional nation (pp. 309–339). New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. L. (2011). Governance in the midst of diversity: Issues and challenges. In D. C. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 388–405). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (2004). Multicultural MPA curriculum: Are we preparing culturally competent public administrators? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Zipp, J. F. (2012). 2011 Hans O. Mauksch address teaching for whom? Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 301–311. doi:10.1177/0092055X12455650
   Google Scholar