Seeing gender and its consequences

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational analysis. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational theory (pp. 235–248). London, UK: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2001). Gendered organization theory. In J. M. Shafritz, J. S. Ott, & Y. S. Jang (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (5th ed., pp. 391–399). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 31(3), 214–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211209072
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J., & Van Houten, D. R. (1974). Differential recruitment and control: The sex structuring of organizations. Administration Science Quarterly, 19(2), 152–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (1998). Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies, 19(5), 787–805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishu, S. G., & Alkadry, M. G. (2017). A systematic review of the gender pay gap and factors that predict it. Administration and Society, 49(1), 65–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716636928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2018). Public leaders are gendered: Making gender visible in public affairs leadership education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3), 181–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2005.12001392
   Google Scholar
• Burris, B. H. (1996). Technocracy, patriarchy, and management. In D. L. Collinson & J. Hearn (Eds.), Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements (pp. 61–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D., & Hearn, J. (1994). Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work and Organization, 1(1), 2–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (1996). Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2000). Being the “go-to guy”: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology, 23(4), 379–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005522707921
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social sciences. In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 105–117). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In E. Thomas & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Feldberg, R. L., & Glenn, E. N. (1979). Male and female: Job versus gender model in the sociology of work. Social Problems, 26(5), 524–538. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/800039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (2005). Feminist methodology: New applications in the academy and public policy. Feminist Approaches to Social Science, 30(4), 2211–2236.
   Google Scholar
• Franzway, S. (2001). Sexual politics and greedy institutions. Sydney, Australia: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., & Tancred, P. (1992). A feminist perspective on state bureaucracy. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 112–129). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E. (1994). Organizational architecture, gender, and women’s careers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 14(2), 77–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9401400208
   Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E. (2017). Mom work versus dad work in local government. Administration & Society, 49(1), 48–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716641989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. (2015). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., & Parkin, P. W. (1983). Gender and organizations: A selective review and a critique of a neglected area. Organization Studies, 4, 219–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068300400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, N. (in press). Whiteness and masculinity in nonprofit organizations: Law, money, and institutional race and gender. Administrative Theory & Praxis.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1975). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstead, S. (2000). Comment: Gender blindness or gender suppression? A comment on Fiona Wilson’s research note. Organization Studies, 21(1), 297–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600211007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S., Bryans, P., & Waring, T. (2004). Unlearning gender blindness: New directions in management education. Management Decision, 42(3/4), 565–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740410522287
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, S., & Larson, S. J. (2018). Prioritizing social equity in MPA curricula: A cross-program analysis and a case study. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(3), 361–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1426429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., & Tancred, P. (1992). Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). The gender of bureaucracy. In D. L. Collinson & J. Hearn (Eds.), Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements (pp. 43–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (updated ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, K. (1996). Entrepreneurialism, masculinities, and the self-made man. In D. L. Collinson & J. Hearn (Eds.), Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements (pp. 123–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, B., & Garnsey, E. (2003). Analyzing competence: Gender and identity at work. Gender, Work & Organization, 10, 551–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, M. (1993). Masculinity and the British organization man: 1945 to the present. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Swanberg, J. E. (2004). Illuminating gendered organization assumptions. Community, Work & Family, 7(1), 3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1366880042000200271
   Google Scholar
• The Week. (2018, August 17/24). Tokyo. 18(886/887), 9.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor. (2017, April). Women in the labor force: A databook. Report #1065. Retrieved August 18, 2018, from https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2016/home.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (1977). Women in organizations. In S. Clegg & D. Dunkerley (Eds.), Critical issues in organizations (pp. 7–20). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar