https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9758-9135
References
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Author.
- Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013, April 26). The mind of a con man. New York Times, pp. SM44–52.
- Chubin, D. E., Hackett, E. J., & Hackett, E. J. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Gans, J. S., & Shepherd, G. B. (1994). How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 165–179. doi:10.1257/jep.8.1.165
- McQuarrie, F. (2015, May 2). Peer review gone wrong, again [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://allaboutwork.org/2015/05/02/peer-review-gone-wrong-again/
- Ragins, B. R. (2015). Editor’s comments: Developing our authors. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 1–8. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0477
- Rowley, J., & Sbaffi, L. (2018). Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline. Journal of Information Science, 44(5), 644–657. doi:10.1177/0165551517740821
- Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178