References
- Alphabet. (2020, September 25). Alphabet code of conduct. Alphabet Investor Relations. https://abc.xyz/investor/other/code-of-conduct/
- ASPA. (2020). Code of ethics. American Society for Public Administration: Code of Ethics. https://www.aspanet.org/ASPA/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics.aspx
- Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2020). Crowdsourcing moral machines. Communications of the ACM, 63(3), 48–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3339904
- Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
- Baltzly, V. B. (2021). Trolleyology as first philosophy: A puzzle-centered approach to introducing the discipline. Teaching Philosophy, 44(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil202141143
- Baradei, L. E. (2021). Ethics education in public affairs programs: What do faculty around the globe have to say? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1818023
- Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12131
- Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2020). The moral psychology of AI and the ethical opt-out problem. In S. M. Liao (Ed.), Ethics of artificial intelligence (pp. 109–126). Oxford University Press.
- Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654
- Burri, S. (2020). Why moral theorizing needs real cases: The redirection of V-Weapons during the Second World War. Journal of Political Philosophy, 28(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12200
- Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. 2017. Integrity. In E. N. Zalta, (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2017, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/integrity/
- Edmonds, D. (2013). Would you kill the fat man?: The trolley problem and what your answer tells us about right and wrong. Princeton University Press.
- Engisch, K. (1930). Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit im Strafrecht. Scientia Verlag. 2 1964.
- Feynman, R. P. (2005). The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard P. Feynman. Basic Books.
- Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
- Frankfurt, H. (1982). The importance of what we care about. Synthese, 53(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484902
- Fried, B. H. (2012). What does matter? The case for killing the trolley problem (Or letting it die). The Philosophical Quarterly, 62(248), 505–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00061.x
- Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford lncyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2020, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/
- Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Jin, R. K.-X., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & Language, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x
- Himmelreich, J. (2018). Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(3), 669–684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9896-4
- Jones, C. P. (2020, April 7). Coronavirus disease discriminates. Our health care doesn’t have to. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/2020/04/24/coronavirus-disease-discriminates-our-health-care-doesnt-have-opinion-1496405.html
- Kagan, S. (2015). Solving the trolley problem. In E. Rakowski (Ed.), The trolley problem mysteries (pp. 151–168). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190247157.001.0001
- Kamm, F. M. (2020). The use and abuse of the trolley problem: Self-driving cars, medical treatments, and the distribution of harm. In S. M. Liao (Ed.), Ethics of artificial intelligence (pp. 79–108). Oxford University Press.
- Lepora, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2013). On complicity and compromise. Oxford University Press.
- Lin, P. (2016). Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In M. Maurer, B. Lenz, J. C. Gerdes, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous driving—Technical, legal and social aspects (pp. 69–86). Springer. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783662488454
- Meyer, S. J. (2021). Everything is fine! Using “The Good Place” to teach administrative ethics. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1782102
- Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. Revised. 1999
- Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.
- Richardson, H. S. 2018. Moral reasoning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2018, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/reasoning-moral/
- Shafer-Landau, R. (2015). The fundamentals of ethics. Oxford University Press.
- Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265052
- Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press.
- Stratton-Lake, P. 2020. Intuitionism in ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2020, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/intuitionism-ethics/
- Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/796133
- Thomson, J. J. (2008). Turning the trolley. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00144.x
- Thomson, J. J. (2016). Kamm on the trolley problems. In E. Rakowski (Ed.), The trolley problem mysteries (pp. 113–134). Oxford University Press.
- Thomson, J. J., & Sugden, S. J. B. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224
- Welzel, H. (1951). Zum Notstandsproblem. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 63(Jahresband), 47–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1951.63.1.47
- White, D. B., Katz, M., Luce, J., Lo, B., Daugherty Biddison, L., Toner, E., & Halpern, S. (2020). Allocation of scarce critical care resources during a public health emergency. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Critical Care Medicine. https://ccm.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/UnivPittsburgh_ModelHospitalResourcePolicy_2020_04_15.pdf
- Wood, A. (2013). Humanity as end in itself. In S. Scheffler (Ed.), On what matters (Vol. 2, pp. 58–82). Oxford University Press.
- Woollard, F. (2012). The doctrine of doing and allowing I: Analysis of the doing/allowing distinction. Philosophy Compass, 7(7), 448–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00491.x
- Woollard, F. (2015). Doing and allowing harm. Oxford University Press.