135
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Interdisciplinary knowledge integration in public affairs scholarship: An empirical analysis of the contributions of public administration, policy sciences, and nonprofit studies

References

  • Abdolhamid, M., Abdolhoseinzadeh, M., Esmaeili Givi, M., Saberi, M. K., Mirezati, S. Z., & Amiri, M. R. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on public administration: 1923–2020. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(1), 75–96.
  • Adams, W. C., Infeld, D. L., Minnichelli, L. F., & Ruddell, M. W. (2014). Policy journal trends and tensions: JPAM and PSJ. Policy Studies Journal, 42(S1), S118–S137. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12051
  • Adams, W. C., Lind Infeld, D., Wikrent, K. L., & Bintou Cisse, O. (2016). Network bibliometrics of public policy journals. Policy Studies Journal, 44(S1), S133–S151. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12149
  • Allison, G. (2006). Emergence of schools of public policy: Reflections from a founding dean. In R. E. Goodin, M. Moran, & M. Rein (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 58–79). Oxford University Press.
  • Allison, L., Chen, X., Flanigan, S. T., Keyes-Williams, J., Vasavada, T. S., & Saidel, J. R. (2007). Toward doctoral education in nonprofit and philanthropic studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 51S–63S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305054
  • Archambault, É., Beauchesne, O. H., & Caruso, J. (2011). Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 13. pp. 66–77).
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • Ascher, W. (1986). The evolution of the policy sciences: Understanding the rise and avoiding the fall. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(2), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050050212
  • Besio, C., du Gay, P., & Serrano Velarde, K. (2020). Disappearing organization? Reshaping the sociology of organizations. Current Sociology, 68(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120907613
  • Brewer, G. D. (1999). The challenges of Interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004706019826
  • Brooks, A. C. (2000). Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits? Public Administration Review, 60(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00081
  • Brudney, J. L., & Durden, T. K. (1993). Twenty years of the journal of voluntary action Research/Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly: An assessment of past trends and future directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223004
  • Brudney, J. L., & Yoon, N. (2021). Don’t you want my help? Volunteer involvement and management in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(5), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211002343
  • Bushouse, B. K., & Sowa, J. E. (2012). Producing knowledge for practice: Assessing NVSQ 2000–2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011422116
  • Bushouse, B. K., Witkowski, G. R., & Abramson, A. J. (2023). A history of ARNOVA at fifty. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 29S–67S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221138262
  • Chaudhuri, A. (2016). Policy studies, policymaking, and knowledge-driven governance. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(23), 59–68.
  • Chavesc, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review, 69(2), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900207
  • Clarivate. (2021). Web of science journal evaluation process and selection criteria. Web of Science Group. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/journal-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/
  • Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00037
  • Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration, 88(3), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x.
  • Coule, T. M., Dodge, J., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2020). Toward a typology of critical nonprofit studies: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 478–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020919807
  • Cyert, R. M. (1988). The place of nonprofit management programs in higher education. In M. O’Neill, & D. R. Young (Eds.), Educating Managers of Nonprofit Organizations (pp. 33–50). Praeger Publishers.
  • Denhardt, R. B. (1981). Toward a critical theory of public organization. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 628–635. https://doi.org/10.2307/975738
  • Evans, M. D. (2022). Nonprofit journals publication patterns: Visibility or invisibility of gender? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00470-x
  • Farazmand, A. (2012). The future of public administration: Challenges and opportunities—A critical perspective. Administration & Society, 44(4), 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712452658
  • Goodin, R. E., & Klingemann, H.-D. (1998). A new handbook of political science. Oxford University Press.
  • Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government. Macmillan.
  • Goyal, N. (2017). A “review” of policy sciences: Bibliometric analysis of authors, references, and topics during 1970–2017. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9300-6
  • Guy, M. E. (2003). Ties that bind: The link between public administration and political science. The Journal of Politics, 65(3), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00205
  • Hafer, J. A. (2016). Public administration’s identity crisis and the emerging approach that may alleviate it. Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs, 1(1), 6.
  • Handy, F., & Srinivasan, N. (2004). Valuing volunteers: An economic evaluation of the net benefits of hospital volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003260961
  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  • Jackson, S. K., Guerrero, S., & Appe, S. (2014). The state of nonprofit and philanthropic studies doctoral education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014549056
  • Kang, C. H., Baek, Y. M., & Kim, E. H.-J. (2021). Half a century of NVSQ: Thematic stability across years and editors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211017676
  • Kim, Y. (2021). Searching for newness in management paradigms: An analysis of intellectual history in U.S. public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(2), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956678
  • King, B. G. (2017). The relevance of organizational sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 46(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306117692563
  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The nature of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago, 197.
  • Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Haldar, A. (2020). Twenty years of Public Management Review (PMR): A bibliometric overview. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1876–1896. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1721122
  • Larsen, P., & Von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z
  • LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2022). The nexus of public administration, public policy, and nonprofit studies: An empirical mapping of research topics and knowledge integration. Public Administration Review, 83(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13587
  • LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2023). Disciplinary contributions to nonprofit studies: A 20-year empirical mapping of journals publishing Nonprofit research and journal citations by nonprofit scholars. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 68S–101S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221119728
  • Lu, J., & Zhao, J. (2019). Does government funding make nonprofits administratively inefficient? Revisiting the link. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1143–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019859435
  • Ma, J., & Konrath, S. (2018). A century of nonprofit studies: Scaling the knowledge of the field. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00057-5
  • Michels, C., & Schmoch, U. (2012). The growth of science and database coverage. Scientometrics, 93(3), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0732-7
  • Mirabella, R. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 11S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305051
  • Mirabella, R. M., Hoffman, T., Teo, T. K., & McDonald, M. (2019). The evolution of nonprofit management and philanthropic studies in the United States: Are we now a disciplinary field? Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 9(1). https://search.proquest.com/openview/859c4bd0d529a0489b7e40a128859395/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2037378&casa_token=3dhkWc2cmkgAAAAA:0RoA-vsp076KuEYeo5BYIjcbhhKIaH_uXc4IWRprTT8L0SBKbdbooxr0VAbG_d_G9S0YQd6lDQ
  • Mirabella, R. M., & Wish, N. B. (2000). The “Best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00082
  • Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
  • Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2167–2179. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20683
  • Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34
  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Indiana University Press.
  • Nafi’ah, B. A., Roziqin, A., Suhermanto, D. F., & Fajrina, A. N. (2021). The policy studies journal: A bibliometric and mapping study from 2015–2020. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 5881. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5881
  • National Academies. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153
  • Nesbit, R., & Brudney, J. L. (2013). Projections and policies for volunteer programs: The implications of the serve America act for volunteer diversity and management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21080
  • Nesbit, R., Moulton, S., Robinson, S., Smith, C., DeHart-Davis, L., Feeney, M. K., Gazley, B., & Hou, Y. (2011). Wrestling with intellectual diversity in public administration: Avoiding disconnectedness and fragmentation while seeking rigor, depth, and relevance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 1), i13–i28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq062
  • Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R., & Robbin, A. (2017). Examining the evolution of the field of public administration through a bibliometric analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12737
  • O’Neill, M., & Young, D. R. (Eds.). (1988). Educating managers of Nonprofit organizations. Praeger Publishers.
  • Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? 1. Taylor & Francis.
  • Ostrom, V. (2008). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University of Alabama Press.
  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775841
  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [ Computer software]. http://www.R-project.org/
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N., & Lee, K.-H. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from public administration review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02303.x
  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
  • Rosenbloom, D. (2008). The Politics–administration dichotomy in U.S. Historical context. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00836.x
  • Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600104
  • Salamon, L. M. (1998). Nonprofit management education: A field whose time has passed? In M. O’Neill & K. Fletcher (Eds.), Nonprofit management Education: U.S. And world perspectives (pp. 137–145). Greenwood Publishing Company.
  • Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge.
  • Science-Metrix. (2021). News. https://science-metrix.com/?q=en/news&page=5
  • Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2014). Research trends in nonprofit graduate studies: A growing interdisciplinary field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014548279
  • Smith, D. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003254841
  • Soskis, B. (2020). A history of associational life and the Nonprofit sector in the United States. In W. W. Powell & P. Bromley (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed. pp. 23–80). Stanford University Press.
  • Tahmasebi, R., & Musavi, S. M. M. (2011). Politics-administration dichotomy: A century debate. Administration & Public Management Review, 17, 130–143.
  • Testa, J. (2011). The globalization of web of science: 2005–2010. Thomson Reuters. http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/globalwos-essay
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • van Raan, A. F. J., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research. Research Policy, 31(4), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00129-9
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2002). Public administration: An interdisciplinary critical analysis. CRC Press.
  • Vogel, R. (2014). What happened to the public organization? A bibliometric analysis of public administration and organization studies. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012470867
  • Vogel, R., & Hattke, F. (2022). A century of public administration: Traveling through time and topics. Public Administration, 100(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12831
  • Wessels, J. S. (2023). Meaningful knowledge about public administration: Epistemological and methodological antecedents. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 45(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2158633
  • Whicker, M. L., Olshfski, D., & Strickland, R. A. (1993). The troublesome cleft: Public administration and political science. Public Administration Review, 53(6), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.2307/977363
  • White, L. D. (1948). Introduction to the study of public administration. Macmillan
  • Wickham, H. (2019). R package “stringr” (1.4.0) [ Computer software]. http://stringr.tidyverse.org, https://github.com/tidyverse/stringr
  • Wickham, H. (2020). R package “ggplot2” (3.3.3) [ Computer software]. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org, https://github.com/tidyverse/ggplot2
  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657355
  • Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277
  • Wright, B. E. (2011). Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of Law, management, and political science. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02310.x
  • Wright, B. E., Manigault, L. J., & Black, T. R. (2004). Quantitative research measurement in public administration: An assessment of journal publications. Administration & Society, 35(6), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703257266
  • Young, D. (1999). Nonprofit management studies in the United States: Current developments and future prospects. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.1999.12022049
  • Zalmanovitch, Y. (2014). Don’t reinvent the wheel: The search for an identity for public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(4), 808–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314533456
  • Zuo, Z., Qian, H., & Zhao, K. (2019). Understanding the field of public affairs through the lens of ranked Ph. D. programs in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 47(S1), S159–S180. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12322