Assessing Rule Compliance and Robustness in Recreational Resource Management

References

• AF (Access Fund) (2003) Access Fund Scoping Comments for Indian Creek Corridor Recreation Plan, UT. Available at http://www.friendsofindiancreek.org/documents/AF-Scoping-Comments-ICC-Rec-Plan.pdf (accessed 20 April 2010).
   Google Scholar
• AF (Access Fund) (2004) Access Fund Scoping Comments to Draft Indian Creek Corridor Recreation Plan. Available at http://www.friendsofindiancreek.org/documents/AF-Comments-ICC-Rec-Plan.pdf (accessed 20 April 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. (2002). Common resources and institutional sustainability. in: E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich & E. U. Weber (Eds), The Drama of the Commons, pp. 41–85. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Baland, J. & Platteau, J. (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Basurto, X. (2005). How locally designed access and use controls can prevent the tragedy of the commons in a Mexican small-scale fishing community. Society and Natural Resources, 18(7), 643–659. doi: 10.1080/08941920590959631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, E. (2003) Environmental protection in the theory of commons (Conference paper). Indiana University, Digital Library of the Commons. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10535/1101 (accessed 20 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (1989). in: F. Berkes (Eds), Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development, (London: Belhaven Press).
   Google Scholar
• BLM (Bureau of Land Management Monticello Field Office) (2004) Indian Creek Corridor Plan and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Assessment No. UT-090–00–47. Available at http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/ut/monticellofo/recreation/indian_creek_corridor.Par.6702.File.dat/ICEA.pdf (accessed 16 May 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Arnold, G. & Tomas, S. V. (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management, Ecology and Society, 15(4), Art. no. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Dolsak, N. & Ostrom, E. (2003). in: N. Dolsak & E. Ostrom (Eds), The Commons in the New Millennium: Challenges and Adaptation, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, L. (2006). Digging beneath the surface: Transposition, implementation and evaluation of European environmental law. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 8(2), 107–133. doi: 10.1080/15239080600769825
   Google Scholar
• FOIC (Friends of Indian Creek) (2008) Friends of Indian Creek: History and Timeline (Moab, UT: FOIC).
   Google Scholar
• Haase, D., Lamers, M. & Amelung, B. (2009). Heading into uncharted territory? Exploring the institutional robustness of self-regulation in the Antarctic tourism sector. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(4), 411–430. doi: 10.1080/09669580802495717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovik, S., Sandstrom, C. & Zachrisson, A. (2010). Management of protected areas in Norway and Sweden: Challenges in combining central governance and local participation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 12(2), 159–177. doi: 10.1080/15239081003719219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. J. S. (2006). Collective action problems posed by no-take zones. Marine Policy, 30(2), 143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. J. S. & Burgess, J. (2005). Building partnership capacity for the collaborative management of marine protected areas in the UK: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 77(3), 227–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran, M. A. & Shivakoti, G. P. (2009) Design principles and robustness of spate community managed irrigation systems in the Punjab, Pakistan. Indiana University, Digital Library of the Commons. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10535/224 (accessed 20 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 109–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layzer, J. A. (2008). Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-based Management and the Environment, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. & Sabatier, P. (1989). Implementation and Public Policy, (Lanham, MD: University Press of America).
   Google Scholar
• McCay, B. J. & Achison, J. M. (1987). Human Ecology of the Commons, (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press).
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1985). Regulation: Politics, Bureaucracy, and Economics, (New York: St. Martin's Press).
   Google Scholar
• NAU (Northern Arizona University) (2007a). Indian Creek Climbing Area Climbing Impact Assessment Overview, (Flagstaff: NAU).
   Google Scholar
• NAU (Northern Arizona University) (2007b). Indian Creek Climbing Area Dispersed Camping Impact Assessment Overview, (Flagstaff: NAU).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 21–64. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009) Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: What have we learned?, in: K. G. Ingram & Y. Hong (Eds.) Property Rights and Land Policies, pp. 25–51 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V. & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. in: SavasE. S. (Ed.), Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, pp. 7–49. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R. & Fitzgibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management, 33(6), 876–885. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3038-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation, (London: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, C. H., Huby, M., Kiwasila, H. & Lovett, J. C. (2007). Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(1), 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). in: L. M. Salamon (Ed.), Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Government, (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Samakanda, I., Senzanje, A. & Mjmba, M. (2002) Small irrigation schemes: A common property resource with management challenges. Indiana University, Digital Library of the Commons. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10535/2328 (accessed 20 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. (2004). Common-pool resource theory. in: R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino & R. O'Leary (Eds), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, pp. 145–173. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schuett, M. A., Selin, S. W. & Carr, D. S. (1998). Collaborative planning and National Forest management. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 15(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. M. (1999) Common property design principles and development in a Honduran community. Praxis: The Fletcher Journal of Development Studies, 15(1), pp. 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• USGS (Unites States Geological Survey Canyonlands Research Station) (2006) An Introduction to Biological Soil Crusts. Available at http://www.soilcrust.org/crust101.htm (accessed 13 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1988). Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India, (San Fransisco, CA: ICS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., Memon, A. & Painter, B. (2011). Science, society, and water resources in New Zealand: Recognizing and overcoming a societal impasse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 49–69. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2011.564414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. & May, P. J. (2001). Motivation for compliance with environmental regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 675–698. doi: 10.1002/pam.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yandle, T. (2003). The challenge of building successful stakeholder organizations: New Zealand's experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Marine Policy, 27(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00071-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar