Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re)conceiving Wind Power's ‘Planning Problem’

References

• Adelle, C., Jordan, A., & Turnpenny, J. (2012). Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 401–415. doi: 10.1068/c11104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, M. (2009). Wind power planning controversies and the construction of ‘expert’ and ‘lay’ knowledges. Science as Culture, 18(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1080/09505430802385682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834–1841. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amossy, R. (2001). Ethos at the crossroads of disciplines: Rhetoric, pragmatics, sociology. Poetics Today, 22(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1215/03335372-22-1-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. (2013). Energy bridge information. Retrieved from April 25, 2014, from http://www.environ.ie/en/DevelopmentHousing/PlanningDevelopment/Planning/PublicConsultations/Submissions-WindEnergy/Offaly/FileDownLoad,36170,en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2012). Rhetoric. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Walker, G., & Cass, N. (2012). Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 36–50. doi: 10.1177/0963662510365663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Ellis, G., & Robinson, C. (2008). Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 67–98. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2014). Collective action and social change: Examining the role of representation in the communication between protesters and third-party members. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/casp.2214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Gray, T., Haggett, C., & Swaffield, J. (2013). Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., Barnett, J., Carr, A., Clift, R., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2007). Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge: A qualitative investigation of practice in the UK chemicals industry. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1177/0963662506071285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Utilitarianism's bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory, 1(2), 163–187. doi: 10.1177/147309520200100205
   Google Scholar
• Cass, N., & Walker, G. (2009). Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), 62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2009.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Making electricity networks ‘visible’: Industry actor representations of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 17–35. doi: 10.1177/0963662510362658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. (2007). Wind power and ‘the planning problem’: The experience of Wales. European Environment, 17(5), 291–306. doi: 10.1002/eet.464
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. (2010). Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning-the construction of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Lennon, M. (2014). The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land-use planning: drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 263–282. doi: 10.1068/c12289j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawly, M. (2013, June 27). Untitled Column. Midland Topic Newspaper, p. 5. Mullingar: Topic Newspapers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: Breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 2(1), 19–26. doi: 10.1002/wcc.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoECLG. (2013). ‘Targeted Review’ of the Irish wind energy development guidelines. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517–551. doi: 10.1080/09640560701402075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P., & Szarka, J. (2009). Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception. Planning Theory and Practice, 40(4), 523–532.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. London: The University of Chicago Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., Murphy, E., & Grist, B. (2011). Legislative change in Ireland: A Marxist political economy critique of planning law. Town Planning Review, 82(6), 639–668. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.37
   Google Scholar
• Fry, B. R., & Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2008). Mastering public administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Futák-Campbell, B., & Haggett, C. (2011). Tilting at windmills? Using discourse analysis to understand the attitude-behaviour gap in renewable energy conflicts. Mekhanizm Rehuluvannya Economiky [Mechanism of Economic Regulation], 1, 1207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Garavan, M. (2007). Resisting the costs of ‘development’: Local environmental activism in Ireland. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 844–863. doi: 10.1080/09644010701634224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. (2003). Strategies of postcultural policy analysis. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 247–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. (2007). Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos and pathos. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 237–250). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. (2012). Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States: Embodiments, scenographies, and emotions. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 211–235). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G., & Dearin, R. D. (2003). Chaim Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, R. (2009). The problems of planning—a developer's perspective. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(4), 532–334.
   Google Scholar
• Hartelius, E. J. (2010). The rhetoric of expertise. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2705–2714. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P. (2014). Planning reform, rescaling, and the construction of the postpolitical: The case of the planning act 2008 and nuclear power consultation in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 697–713. doi: 10.1068/c1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., & Eiser, J. R. (2009). Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4604–4614. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., & Eiser, R. J. (2010). Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? Energy Policy, 38(6), 3106–3117. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maingueneau, D. (1999). Analysing self-constituting discourses. Discourse Studies, 1(2), 175–199. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001002003
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. (1998). Objectivity as a problem: An attempt at an overview. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560, 55–68. doi: 10.1177/0002716298560001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2013). Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, K., & Milbourne, P. (2014). Constructing a ‘landscape justice’ for windfarm development: The case of Nant Y Moch, Wales. Geoforum, 53, 104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, K., & O'Hare, P. (2008). ‘We're not NIMBYs!’ Contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities. Local Environment, 13(4), 321–335. doi: 10.1080/13549830701803273
   Google Scholar
• McGreevy, R. (2013, April 9). Opposition mounts to building of wind farms in midlands. Irish Times. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/opposition-mounts-to-building-of-wind-farms-in-midlands-1.1352942#.UWPF3_3Lz_c.twitter
   Google Scholar
• Mercille, J. (2014). The role of the media in sustaining Ireland's housing bubble. New Political Economy, 19(2), 282–301. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.779652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, L., & Rau, H. (2014). Mapping divergent concepts of sustainability: Lay knowledge, local practices and environmental governance. Local Environment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.963838
   Google Scholar
• Oireachtas. (2006). Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2007. Dublin: Oireachtas Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Oireachtas. (2010). Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2010. Dublin: Oireachtas Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2011). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., Rayner, T., & Bina, O. (2004). New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A, 36(11), 1943–1959. doi: 10.1068/a36281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M. J. (2011). Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common cause. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(4), 907–917. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.568879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. (2011). The politics of facts: Local environmental conflicts and expertise. Environmental Politics, 20(6), 765–785. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2011.617164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plough, A., & Krimsky, S. (1987). The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 12(3/4), 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porta, D. D., & Piazza, G. (2007). Local contention, global framing: The protest campaigns against the TAV in Val di Susa and the bridge on the Messina Straits. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 864–882. doi: 10.1080/09644010701634257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2003). Conflict, consensus, and rationality in environmental planning: An institutional discourse approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. doi: 10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality. Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Raven, R., & Van Venrooij, A. (2010). From riches to rags: Biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy, 38(9), 5013–5027. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, R. (2013a). Primetime report. Dublin: RTÉ.
   Google Scholar
• Shortt, R. (2013b, February 17). Reaping the wind? The Sunday Business Post. Retrieved from www.businesspost.ie/#!article/2ce5f6ce-c893-4b01-8665-ob27a93b6d40
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1993). Survey research as rhetorical trope: Electric power planning arguments in Chicago. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 117–144). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, C. W. (2011). Character and knowledge: Learning from the speech of experts. Argumentation, 25(3), 341–353. doi: 10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D. (1998). The politics of green energy. Environmental Politics, 7(2), 166–173. doi: 10.1080/09644019808414399
   Google Scholar
• Usher, M. (2013). Defending and transcending local identity through environmental discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 811–831. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.765685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (1995). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2012). Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power. Energy Policy, 48, 83–87. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2003). Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: Wind farm development in Mid Wales. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 271–288. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar