468
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adoption of Novelties in a Pluralist Society: Exploring an Agropark Case Study

&

References

  • Akrich, M. & Latour, B. (1992) A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies, in: W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, pp. 259–264 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Beck, U. (1997) De wereld als risicomaatschappij. Essays over de ecologische crisis en de politiek van de vooruitgang. (Amsterdam: De Balie).
  • Bijker, W., Hughes, T. & Pinch, T. (Eds) (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT press).
  • Bokma-Bakker, M. H., de Bakker, H. C. M., Bremmer, B., Commandeur, M. A. M., de Lauwere, C. C., van Os, J., Beekman, V., van den Ham, A. & Selnes, T. (2011) Maatschappelijke acceptatie van (grootschalige) veehouderij in LOG’s: over de houding van burgers en boeren en rollen van overheden. Research Rapport No. 515 Livestock Research Wageningen UR. Available at http://edepot.wur.nl/185307 (accessed 6 June 2012).
  • Bos, B. & Grin, J. (2008) Doing reflexive modernization in pig husbandry: The hard work of changing the course of a river, Science Technology Human Values, 33(4), pp. 480–507. doi: 10.1177/0162243907306697
  • Collingridge, D. (1981) The Social Control of Technology (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
  • Driessen, C. (2007) Stacking pigs: Dutch pig tower debates and the changing nature of ethical livestock production, in: W. Zollitsch, C. Winkler, S. Waiblinger & A. Haslberger (Eds) Sustainable Food Production and Ethics, pp. 219–223 (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers).
  • van Eck, W., Groot, R., Hulsteijn, K., Smeets, P. J. A. M. & van Steekelenburg, M. G. N. (2002) Voorbeelden van agribusinessparken. Research Report No. 594 Alterra Wageningen UR. Available at http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/lang/317726 (accessed 9 June 2012).
  • Elzen, B., Leeuwis, C. & Mierlo, v. B. (2008) Anchorage of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to use the greenhouse effect as an energy source. Paper presented at the International Conference Transitions Towards Sustainability Agriculture, Food Chains and Peri-Urban Areas, Wageningen, The Netherlands, October.
  • Engelbart, F. & de Wilt, J. (1998) Initiatief Duurzame Voedselvoorziening (IDV). Ontwerp voor een businessplan. Research Report NRLO No. 98/27. Available at http://www.agro.nl/nrlo/achtergrondstudies/pdf/9827.pdf (accessed 5 April 2011).
  • Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, 31(8–9), pp. 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  • Geels, F. W. (2005) Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Coevolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  • Gellner, D. & Hirsch, E. (Eds) (2001) Inside Organizations: Anthropologists at Work (Oxford: Berg Publishers).
  • Grin, J. (2010) Understanding transitions from a governance perspective, in: J. Grin, J. Rotmans & J. Schot (Eds) Transition to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, pp. 221–377 (New York: Routledge).
  • Grin, J. & van De Graaf, H. (1996) Technology assessment as learning, Science Technology Human Values, 21(1), pp. 72–99. doi: 10.1177/016224399602100104
  • Grin, J. & van Staveren, A. (2007) Werken aan systeeminnovaties, Lessen uit de praktijk van InnovatieNetwerk. (Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum).
  • Grunwald, A. (2007) Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3), pp. 245–262. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622774
  • Hendriks, C. M. & Grin, J. (2007) Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), pp. 333–350. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622790
  • Hoes, A.-C. (2011) Inside the black box of agricultural innovation projects, exploring the interactions between farmers, greenhouses, scientists, pigs & neighbours, Doctoral dissertation, Oisterwijk, The Netherlands; Boxpress. Available at http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/32365 (accessed 2 July 2012).
  • Hoes, A.-C., Beekman, V., Regeer, B. & Bunders, J. F. G. (2012) Unravelling the dynamics of adopting novel technologies: An account of how the closed greenhouse opened-up, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 8(1), pp. 37–59. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2012.044286
  • Hoes, A.-C., Regeer, B. J. & Bunders, J. F. G. (2008) Transformers in knowledge production: Building science-practice collaborations, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 5(3), pp. 207–220. doi: 10.1080/14767330802461298
  • Hoes, A.-C., Regeer, B. & Zweekhorst, M. (2012) Sustainable development of agriculture: Exploring the relation between future visions and bottom-up entrepreneurship in the Agropark case, Journal of Chain and Network Science, 12(2), pp. 111–124. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2012.x007
  • Horlings, L. G. & Hinssen, J. P. P. (2010) Sustainable innovation in intensive animal husbandry in the Netherlands: Putting your money where your mouth is. Paper presented at the Conference Scaling and Governance, Wageningen, The Netherlands, November.
  • Huber, J. (2000) Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2(4), pp. 269–285. doi: 10.1080/714038561
  • Hughes, T. (1987) The evolution of large technological systems, in: W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51–82 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: HarperCollins).
  • KnowHouse & Arcadis (2010) Nieuw Gemengd Bedrijf, Milieueffecten-rapportage. Available at http://www.nieuwgemengdbedrijf.nl/mer/s/26 (accessed 6 April 2011).
  • Kool, A., Eijck, I. & Blonk, H. (2008) Nieuw Gemengd Bedrijf: duurzaam en innovatief? Research report Blok Milieuadvies. Available at http://www.blonkmilieuadvies.nl/nl/pdf/eindrapport%20NGB%20def.pdf (accessed 6 April 2011).
  • Kupper, F., Krijgsman, L., Bout, H. & de Cock Buning, T. (2007) The value lab: Exploring moral frameworks in the deliberation of values in the animal biotechnology debate, Science and Public Policy, 34(9), pp. 657–670. doi: 10.3152/030234207X264944
  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
  • Latour, B. (1991) Technology is society made durable, in: J. Law (Ed) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 103–131 (London: Routledge).
  • van Mansfeld, M. J. M., Pleijte, M., de Jonge, J. M. & Smit, H. (2003) De regiodialoog als methode voor vernieuwende gebiedsontwikkeling; de casus Noord-Limburg, Bestuurskunde, 12(6), pp. 262–273.
  • Meijer, I. & M. P. Hekkert (2007) Managing uncertainties in the transition towards sustainability: Cases of emerging energy technologies in the Netherlands, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), pp. 281–298. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622865
  • Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit & Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (2002) Rijkskader Reconstructieplannen, ‘s-Gravenhage.
  • Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (2008) Convenant Schone en Zuinige Agrosectoren. Available at http://www.senternovem.nl/mmfiles/LNVConvenant_tcm24-303178.pdf (accessed 2 April 2011).
  • Poot, E. & Enting, I. (2005) Position Paper NGB (Wageningen, UR: Plant Research International).
  • Regeer, B. J. (2009) Making the invisible visible: Analysing the development of strategies and changes in knowledge production to deal with persistent problems in sustainable development, Doctoral dissertation,Oisterwijk, The Netherlands: Boxpress.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (New York: Free Press).
  • de Rooij, S. J. G., de Lauwere C. C. & van der Ploeg, J. D. (2010) Entrapped in group solidarity? Animal welfare, the ethical positions of farmers and the difficult search for alternatives, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(4), pp. 341–361. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2010.528882
  • Schively, C. (2007) Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research, Journal of Planning Literature, 21(3), pp. 255–266. doi: 10.1177/0885412206295845
  • Schön, D. & Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books).
  • Smeets, P. (2009) Expeditie Agroparken. Ontwerpend onderzoek naar metropolitane landbouw en duurzame ontwikkeling, Doctoral dissertation. Available at http://webdocs.alterra.wur.nl/Internet/Landschap/Agroparks/Smeets_promotie/Expeditie%20Agroparken-LR.pdf (accessed 3 May 2012).
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Newbury Park: Sage).
  • Termeer, C. J. A. M., Pot, W. D., Breeman, G. E. & van Lieshout, M. (2009, August) Trust, knowledge, and democracy. The public debate about Dutch mega-stables. Paper presented at the International RNMO Conference Towards Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Voszlig, J.-P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J. & Nölting, B. (2007) Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), pp. 193–212. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622881
  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. & Bürer, M. (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept, Energy Policy, 35(5), pp. 2683–2691. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
  • Yin, R. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Los Angeles: Sage).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.