Using ‘Mobility Environments' in Practice: Lessons from a Metropolitan Transit Corridor in Spain

References

• Aguilera, F. (2008). Análisis ecopaisajístico para la ordenación territorial del área metropolitana de Granada (PhD diss.). Universidad de Granada, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, G., & Mahalel, D. (2006). Congestion tolls and parking fees: A comparison of the potential effect on travel behaviour. Transport Policy, 13(6), 496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2006). Evolution and status. Where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here? In E. R. Alexander (Ed.), Evaluation in planning: Evolution and prospects (pp. 3–16). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2009). Dilemmas in evaluating planning, or back to basics: What is planning for? Planning,Theory & Practice, 10(2), 233–244. doi: 10.1080/14649350902884177
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2002). Sustainable development – or faster, further and more? In J. Jenkins (Ed.), Remaking the landscapes of Britain (pp. 85–104). London: London Profile Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport policy, 15, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., Anderton, K., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M., & Schwanen, T. (2011). Transportation and the Environment. Annual Review Environmental Resources, 36, 247–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-032310-112100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., Hickman, R., & Stead, D. (2008). Looking over the horizon: Visioning and backcasting. In A. H. Perrels, V. Himanen, & M. Lee-Gosselin (eds.), Building blocks for sustainable transport: Obstacles, trends, solutions (pp. 25–54). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2006). Fostering urbanity in a mobile society: Linking concepts and practices. Journal of Urban Design, 11(3), 319–334. doi: 10.1080/13574800600888269
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2012). Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: A manifesto. DISP, 48(1), 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., Clercq, F. L., & Straatemeier, T. (2008). Urban transportation planning in transition. Transport Policy, 15(2), 69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., & Djist, M. (2003). Mobility environments and network cities. Journal of Urban Design, 8(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1080/1357480032000064755
   Google Scholar
• Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2008). Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners. Transport Policy, 15(4), 251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2002). Local and global: Cities in the network society. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(5), 548–558. doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research, 2, 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. F., & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3(4), 203–226. doi: 10.1080/15568310802178314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., Renne, J. L., & Bertolini, L. (Eds.). (2009). Transit oriented development: Making it happen. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. J. (2010). Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making. Progress in Planning, 74(2), 53–106. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1780(1), 87–114. doi: 10.3141/1780-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15(4), 299–318. doi: 10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, K. (2008). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35(1), 37–54. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., Darbas, T., & Lawson, S. (2004). Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies: A socio-theoretic analysis. Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), 345–366. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000296290
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2002). Accesibility vs mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the US. Paper prepared for the ESTO study on the impacts of ICT on transport and mobility, November.
   Google Scholar
• Hass-Klau, C., & Crampton, G. (2005). Future of Urban transport. Learning from success and weakness: Light rail. Environmental and transport planning. Wuppertal: Bergische Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E. (2014). Moving towards low carbon mobility. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(1), 577–579. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.891340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solution in cities. Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2009). Greening transport—explaining urban transport policy change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(3), 243–261. doi: 10.1080/15239080903056417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Boujenko, N., & Laidet, L. (2008). Link and place: A guide to street planning and design. London: Landor.
   Google Scholar
• Khisty, C. J., & Arslan, T. (2005). Possibilities of steering the transportation planning process in the face of bounded rationality and unbounded uncertainty. Transportation research part C, 13, 77–92. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Yi, C., & Hong, S. P. (2013). Urban structural hierarchy and the relationship between the ridership of the Seoul Metropolitan Subway and the land-use pattern of the station areas. Cities, 35, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2009). Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Loukopoulos, P., & Scholz, R. W. (2004). Sustainable future urban mobility: Using ‘area development negotiations’ for scenario assessment and participatory strategic planning. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2203–2226. doi: 10.1068/a36292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., & Faludi, A. (1997). Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24(6), 815–832. doi: 10.1068/b240815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli, G. (2013). Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet: Households without cars and car dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 379–400. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindali, O., Raveh, A., & Salomon, I. (2004). Urban density and energy consumption: A new look at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A, 38, 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research B, 43(3), 204–228. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P. (2009). Residential self selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 293–324. doi: 10.1080/01441640802710812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, P., & Sandberg, S. L. (1996). Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies, 33(3), 557–580. doi: 10.1080/00420989650011915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Jensen, O. B. (2002). Urban land use, mobility and theory of science: Exploring the potential for critical realism in empirical research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 4(4), 295–311. doi: 10.1002/jepp.114
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. M., Forsyth, A., & Schmitz, K. H. (2007). The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: The twin cities walking study. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 4(16), 113–224.
   Google Scholar
• Pitombo, C. S., Kawamoto, E., & Sousa, A. J. (2010). An exploration analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns. Transport Policy, 18, 347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, K. A., & Goetz, A. R. (2013). The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities, 30, 31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, D. A., Brisson, E. M., & Estupiñán, N. (2009). The relationship between segment-level built environment attributes and pedestrian activity around Bogota's BRT stations. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 14(7), 470–478. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger Evans Associated. (2007). Urban design Compendium 2. London REA fir English Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. (2013). Structural accessibility for mobility management. Progress in Planning, 81, 1–49. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C., & Pinho, P. (2010). The structural accessibility layer (SAL): Revealing how urban structures constrains travel choice. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2735–2752. doi: 10.1068/a42477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Y. J., Fard, P., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., & Maarseveen, M. V. (2014). Measuring transit oriented development: A spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City region Arnhem and Nijmegen. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 130–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani, A., & Allan, A. (2006). Analyzing the impacts of microscale urban attributes on travel: Evidence from suburban Adelaide, Australia. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(3), 132–137. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:3(132)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., &Knaap, G. (2004). Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara, J. (2012). Modelo de umbrales para la evaluación ambiental de la movilidad urbana (Thesis diss.). University of Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara, J. A., Bertolini, L., & te Brommelstroet, M. (2015). Environmental Impact assessment in transport planning: Exploring process-related barriers in Spanish practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara, J. A., & Valenzuela-Montes, L. M. (2014a). Más allá de la estructura urbana y del patrón de viaje. El' entorno de movilidad' como instrumento para la planificación y la evaluación. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 64, 273–296.
   Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara, J. A., & Valenzuela-Montes, L. M. (2014b). Diseño de un sistema de rendimiento ambiental en corredores de movilidad urbana. Architecture, City and Environemnt, 9(25), 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, A., Bertolini, L., & Grin, J. (2013). Transitions of mobility systems in urban regions: A heuristic framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 141–160. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.746182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talavera-García, R., Soria-Lara, J. A., & Valenzuela-Montes, L. M. (2014). La calidad peatonal como método para evaluar entornos de movilidad urbanos. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 60(1), 161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Montes, L. M., (2011). El Metropolitano de Granada como instrumento de innovación, calidad y sostenibilidad urbana. Tomo VII: Panel de expertos y actores locales de la movilidad metropolitana de Granada. Informe final del convenio de investigación realizado entre la Universidad de Granada y la empresa pública Ferrocarriles de Andalucía.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Montes, L. M., Soria-Lara, J. A. & Talavera-García, R. (2011). Hacia la integración de los planes y proyectos andaluces de movilidad metropolitana. Scripta Nova. Geocrítica, 15(349), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2004). The politics of mobility: Transport, the environment and public policy. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vuchic, V. R. (2005). Urban Transit. Operations, planning and economics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. I., & Scholz, R. W. (2007). Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: A comparative evaluation of transport planning projects. Transportation, 34, 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s11116-006-9000-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., & Fürst, F. (2004). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art. Retrieved from SSRN 1434678.
   Google Scholar
• Willson, R. (2001). Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation, 28, 1–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1005247430522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, J., & Farthing, S. (1997). Coordinating facility provision and new housing development: Impacts on car and local facility use. Evaluating Local Environmental Policy, 1, 159–179.
   Google Scholar
• Zandvliet, R., Bertolini, L., & Dijst, M. (2008). Towards planning for a mobile society: Mobile and residential populations and the performance of places. European Planning Studies, 16(10), 1459–1472. doi: 10.1080/09654310802420185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegras, C., Sussman, J., & Conklin, C. (2004). Scenario planning for strategic regional transportation planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development (ASCE). 130(1), 2–13. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:1(2)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar