New World, Old Ideas—A Narrative of the Lithuanian Forestry Transition

References

• Abbott, A. (1990). Conceptions of time and events in social science methods: Causal and narrative approaches. Historical Methods, 23, 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (1987). Political philosophy, practical reason and policy analysis. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), Confronting values in policy analysis. The politics of criteria (2nd ed., pp. 23–44). Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B. (2012). Forest policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Behagel, J., Turnhout, E., de Koning, J., & van Bommel, S. (2014). A practice based approach to forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Leroy, P., & Van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organisation Review, 6(2), 93–106. doi: 10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Augutis, D. (2011). Miškas – bioįvairovės prieglobstis’ [Forest – a shelter for biodiversity]. Miškai, 9(21), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Augutis, D. (2012). Bioįvairovė Lietuvos miškuose [Biodiversity in Lithuanian forests]. Miškai, 1(25), 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bouriaud, L., Nichiforel, L., Weiss, G., Bajraktari, A., Curovic, M., Dobsinska, Z., … Zalite, Z. (2013). Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: An analysis of forest harvesting and management rights. Annals of Forest Research, 56(1), 199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouriaud, L., & Schmithüsen, F. (2005). Allocation of property rights on forests through ownership reform and forest policies in Central and Eastern European countries. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, 156(8), 297–305. doi: 10.3188/szf.2005.0297
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, A. (2011). Ar saugom tik 1% misku? [Are we only protecting 1% of forests?]. Miškai, 12(24), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, A. (2003a). Miškų ekonomika ir finansai tarpukario lietuvoje [Forest economics and finances in the interwar Lithuania]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas, & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 371–374). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, A. (2003b). Miškų nuosavybė [Forest ownership]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas, & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 121–125). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, A., & Kairiūkštis, L. (2003). Miško kirtimai ir bendras naudojimas [Forest cuttings and overall utilisation]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas, & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 181–187). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, V. (2010). Model of state forestry administration and media thriller in Lithuania. In F. Helles & P. Steen Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Gilleleje, Denmark, May 2010. Scandinavian Forest Economics, 43, 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., Felton, A., Lindbladh, M., & Sallnäs, O. (2013). Linking forest management, policy and biodiversity indicators—a comparison of Lithuania and Southern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 291, 181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., & Hjortso, C. N. (2004). A power analysis of international assistance to Lithuanian forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(4), 166–176. doi: 10.1080/14004080410034254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., Kavaliauskas, M., Mozgeris, G., & Stanislovaitis, S. (2013). Suvalkija WP 3.1 case study report. Alnarp: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Kaunas: Aleksandras Stulginskis University.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., Kuliešis, A., Sallnäs, O., & Linkevičius, E. (2011). Resource availability, planning rigidity and Realpolitik in Lithuanian forest utilization. Natural Resources Forum, 35(2), 77–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., Linkevičius, E., & Činga, G. (2009). Policy drivers behind forest utilisation in Lithuania in 1986–2007. Baltic Forestry, 15(1), 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., & Sallnäs, O. (2012). Forest management plan as a policy instrument: Stick, carrot or sermon? Land Use Policy, 29(3), 605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., Thorsen, B. J., Helles, F., & Tarp, P. (2001). Discount rate and harvest policy: Implications for the Baltic forestry. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 143–156. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas, V., & Weber, N. (2009). Forest management after the economic transition—at the crossroads between German and Scandinavian traditions. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(8), 586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizer, M., & Van Herzele, A. (2010). Combining deliberative governance theory and discourse analysis to understand the deliberative incompleteness of centrally formulated plans. Forest Policy and Economics, 16(2012), 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dagytė, I. (2004). Lithuania: The science system from 1989–2001. In W. Meske (Ed.), From system transformation to European integration: Science and technology in central and Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 21st century (pp. 165–184). Münster: LIT Verlag Münster.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, W., Arts, B., & Krott, M. (2012). Political theory in forest policy science. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, J. V. (1997). Property matters: How property rights are under assault—and why you should care. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deltuvas, R., Činga, G., Laurinavičius, E., & Mažeika, J. (2006). Valstybinių miškų kompleksinio ūkio plėtros iki 2010 m. strateginio plano projekto, numatančio priemones valstybinio miškų ūkio valdymo, organizavimo bei ekonominio reguliavimo sistemai tobulinti, parengimas [Preparation of strategic plan for systemic development of state forestry until 2010, proposing means for improving the system of management, organisation and economic regulation in state forestry]. Scientific report. Kaunas: Lithuanian University of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Dembinski, P. (1991). The logic of planned economy: The seeds of the collapse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dementavičius, J. (2011). Sąjūdžio tapatybės beieškant: sovietinės reflektyviosios modernybės bruožai Lietuvoje [Looking for the identity of the Reform Movement: Features of Soviet reflective modernity in Lithuania]. Sociologija. Mintis ir Veiksmas, 2(29), 218–243 (with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., & Sahay, R. (2000). The transition economies after ten years. Working Paper 7664. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Owner Association of Lithuania (FOAL). (2011). Prie Seimo dėl miškų įstatymo piketavo ir žalieji, ir miškų savininkai [Both Greens and forest owners’ held picket by Parliament for the Forest Law]. Retrieved from www.forest.lt/go.php/lit/Prie-Seimo-del-Misku-istatymo-piketavo-ir-zalieji-ir-misku-savininkai/3336
   Google Scholar
• Giessen, L. (2010). Regional forest governance—potentials for forestry and political drivers in integrated rural development policy. Goettingen: Goettingen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giessen, L. (2011). Reviewing empirical explanations of policy change: Options for its analysis and future fields of research. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung, 182(11–12), 248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1956). The philosophy of history (J. Sibree, Trans.). Kitchener: Batoche Books.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences, 39, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2008). Contextualising the advocacy coalition framework: Theorising change in Swedish forest policy. Environmental Politics, 17(5), 730–748. doi: 10.1080/09644010802421471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hytonen, M. (2001). Overview of social forestry research and education in Northern Europe. In M. Hytonen (Eds.), Social sustainability of forestry in Northern Europe: Research and education (pp. 15–96). TemaNord: Agriculture and Forestry, Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Jasinevičius, G. (2008). Economic analysis of normative versus practical management of coniferous stands in Lithuania (Master's thesis). Retrieved from Epsilon database http://ex-epsilon.slu.se:8080/archive/00002883/
   Google Scholar
• Jaskelevičius, K. (2010). Miškų valdymas ir Trojos kumelė [Forest administration and Trojan mare] Retrieved from http://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/lit/kjaskelevicius-misku-valdymas-ir-trojos-kumele.d?id=30091389
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., & True, J. L. (1998). Policy punctuations: U.S. budget authority, 1947–1995. Journal of Politics, 60(1), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kairiūkštis, L. (2003). lietuviškos miškininkystės atsiradimas ir būdingesni jos bruožai [Emergence of Lithuanian forestry and its key features]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas, & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 371–374). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Kaszeta, D. J. (1988). Lithuanian resistance to foreign occupation 1940–1952. Lituanus. Lithuanian Quarterly Journal of Arts and Sciences, 34(3), Fall 1988. Retrieved from http://www.lituanus.org/1988/88_3_01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Krott, M. (2005). Forest policy analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuliešis, A. (1993). Lietuvos medynų prieaugio ir jo panaudojimo normatyvai [Forest yield models and tables in Lithuania]. Kaunas: Lithuanian Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kupstaitis, N. (2011). Vyksta esminis persilaužimas. kokia šiandien privačių miškų politika Lietuvoje?’ [Essential breakthrough. what is the current private forest policy in Lithuania?]. Miškai, 1(13), 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. V., & Brukas, V. (2000). Scenarios for the future Lithuanian state forest sector. Baltic Forestry, 6(2), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2009). Forestry in transition: Imperial legacy and negotiated expertise in Romania and Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazdinis, M., Angelstam, P., & Lazdinis, I. (2007). Maintenance of forest biodiversity in a post-Soviet governance model: Perceptions by local actors in Lithuania. Environmental Management, 40, 20–33. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0387-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazdinis, M., Carver, A., Tõnisson, K., & Silamikele, I. (2005). Innovative use of forest policy instruments in countries with economies in transition: Experience of the Baltic States. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazdinis, M., Carver, A. D., Carlsson, L., Tonisson, K., & Vilkriste, L. (2004). Forest policy networks in changing political systems: Case study of the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 35, 402–419. doi: 10.1080/01629770400000181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazdinis, M., Carver, A. D., Lazdinis, I., & Paulikas, V. K. (2009). From union to union: Forest governance in a post-Soviet political system. Environmental Science and Policy, 12, 309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas (LRS). (1994). Lietuvos Respublikos Miškų įstatymas [Forest Act of the Lithuanian Republic]. Vilnius: Valstybės Žinios. Nr. 96-1872.
   Google Scholar
• Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas (LRS). (2011). Lietuvos Respublikos Miškų įstatymas [Forest Act of the Lithuanian Republic]. Vilnius: Valstybės Žinios Nr. 30-1412.
   Google Scholar
• Lietuvos Respublikos Valstybės Kontrolė (LR Valstybės Kontrolė). (2010). Valstybinio audito ataskaita. Valstybinių miškų ūkio veikla. [State audit report. Activities of state forestry]. Nr. VA-P-20–1–7. Vilnius: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mankus, R. (2003). Lietuvos miškai Rusijos imperijos sudėtyje (1795–1915 M.). Miškų ūkis vokiečių okupacijos metais (1915–2018 m.) [Lithuanian forests within the Russia empire (1795–1915). Forestry during the years of German occupation (1915–2018)]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas, & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos Miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 29–41). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE). (1993). Resolution H3. Cooperation with countries with economies in transition. Second MCPFE, 16–17 June 1993, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. (2013). Lithuanian statistical yearbook of forestry. Kaunas: State Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaraitė, D., & Mizaras, S. (2005). The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economies in transition: Observations from Lithuania. Small-Scale Forestry, 4(4), 437–450.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaras, S. (Ed.). (1999). Miškų ūkio modelio, suteikiančio vienodas miškų naudojimo teises konkurenciniais pagrindais valstybinėms ir privačioms įmonėms, sukūrimas [Creation of a forestry model setting equal forest utilisation rights to state and private enterprises on competitive basis]. Scientific report. Girionys: Lithuanian Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nijnik, M., & van Kooten, G. C. (2000). Forestry in the Ukraine: The road ahead? Forest Policy and Economics, 1(2), 139–151. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00015-0
   Google Scholar
• Nijnik, M., Nijnik, A., & Bizikova, L. (2009). Analysing the development of small-scale forestry in Central and Eastern Europe. Small-Scale Forestry, 8, 159–174. doi: 10.1007/s11842-009-9077-3
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, S. (2005). Experiences of policy reforms of the forest sector in transition and other countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 831–847. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg, M. (2007). Ukraine reforms in forestry 1990–2000. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(6), 713–729. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice. An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35–71). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkevičius, L. (2006). Shaping of the public policy culture in Lithuania: Sociological exploration of change in environmental policy and public participation. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas, 1, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvinen, P., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (1999). Finnish cluster studies and new industrial policy making. In OECD, boosting innovation: The cluster approach. OECD proceedings (pp. 361–380). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satkus, P. (2008). Medienos pramonės rykliai siekia perimti girių turtus [Sharks of timber industries wont to take over the riches of forests]. Lietuvos žinios, 2008–03–19.
   Google Scholar
• Schanz, H. (1999). Social changes and forestry. In P. Pelkonen, A. Pitkänen, P. Schmidt, G. Oesten, P. Piussi, & E. Rojas (Eds.), Forestry in changing societies in Europe, Part 1 (pp. 59–82). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385–410. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., Stahl, J., & Dorondel, S. (2009). Negotiating post-socialist property and state: Struggles over forest in Albania and Romania. Development and Change, 40(1), 171–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siry, J. (2003). Today and tomorrow of private forestry in Central and Eastern Europe. In L. Teeter, B. Cashore, & D. Zhang (Eds.), Forest policy for private forestry (pp. 81–91). Oxon: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Šliužas, K. (2013) Dėl medienos pardavimo užvirė aistros [Selling of timber stirred up fervour]. Lietuvos Žinios. Retrieved from http://lzinios.lt/lzinios/Ekonomika/del-medienos-pardavimo-uzvire-aistros/155301
   Google Scholar
• Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2012). The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies—recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislovaitis, A., Brukas, V., & Činga, G. (2011, November 24–25). Controlling private forest owners in Lithuania: Rigid regulation or advisory counselling? Proceedings of the 5th International scientific conference ‘Rural Development 2011: in Global Changes', Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lithuania (pp. 133–138).
   Google Scholar
• Stanislovaitis, A., Brukas, V., Kavaliauskas, M., & Mozgeris, G. (in press). Forest owner is more than her goal: A qualitative typology of Lithuanian owners. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.998706
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1993). The sociology of social change. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trumpa, T. (2011). Valstybiniai miškai—odukros vietoje?’ [State forests a stepdaughter?]. Lithuanian Green Movement. Retrieved from http://www.zalieji.lt/lt/naujienos/75-valstybiniai-mikai-podukros-vietoje
   Google Scholar
• Uselis, V. (2012). Ieškant tiesos [Searching for the truth]. Miškai, 3(27), 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Už Gamtą. (2009). Peticija: prieš miškų kirtimą vasarą ir paukščių naikinimą [Against forest cuttings in summer and destruction of birds. Petition for the Minister of Environment]. Judėjimas ‘Už Gamtą'. Retrieved from http://www.peticijos.lt/visos/1556
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliauskas, A. (1999). Neramios miško dienos. Miškų valdymo politiniai aspektai [Unsettling days in forest. Political aspects of forest administration]. Aušra: Kaunas.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliauskas, A. (2012). Lietuvos miškų administracija atkurtos Nepriklausomybės metu (1990–2011). [Lithuanian forest administration during the period of reinstated Independence (1990–2011)]. Kaunas: Naujanis lankas.
   Google Scholar
• Verbyla, V. (2003). Apsauga nuo savavališkų miško kirtimų [Protection from illegal logging]. In V. Verbyla, A. Brukas & L. Kairiūkštis (Eds.), Lietuvos miškų metraštis XX Amžius (pp. 274–277). Vilnius: Aplinkos Ministerija.
   Google Scholar
• Volz, C. (1997). Waldnutzungskonzepte und ihre forstpolitische Bewertung [Forest use concepts and their evaluation under forest policy aspects]. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 116, 291–300. doi: 10.1007/BF02766905
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & de Leon, P. (2011). A quarter century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., & Sotirov, M. (2011). An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of ‘new modes of governance' in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar