Rescaling the Governance of Renewable Energy: Lessons from the UK Devolution Experience

References

• Benson, D., & Jordan, A. J. (2010). The scaling of water governance tasks: A comparative federal analysis of the European Union and Australia. Environmental Management, 46(1), 7–16. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9354-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A., & Pepper, D. (Eds.). (1987). Nuclear power in crisis. Politics and planning for the nuclear state. New York: Nichols Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. (1999). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J., & Mawson, J. (Eds.). (1997). British regionalism and devolution. The challenges of state reform and European integration. London: Jessica Kingsley and Regional Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Watson, M., & Hudson, R. (2007). Modes of governing municipal waste. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2733–2753. doi: 10.1068/a38269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Watson, M., Hudson, R., & Weaver, P. (2005). Governing municipal waste: Towards a new analytical framework. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/15239080500251700
   Google Scholar
• Butler, H., & Macey, J. (1996). Externalities and the matching principle: The case for reallocating environmental regulatory authority, Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1447. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1447
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2012). Intergovernmental relations in Scotland: What was the SNP effect? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14, 231–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. (2007). Wind power and “the planning problem”: The experience of Wales. European Environment, 17(5), 291–306. doi: 10.1002/eet.464
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Murdoch, J. (1999). Land use and the limits to (regional) governance: Some lessons from planning for housing and minerals in England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(4), 654–669. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Owens, S. (1998). Suitable locations: Equity and sustainability in the minerals planning process. Regional Studies, 32(9), 797–811.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Owens, S. (2006). Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning ‘C’, Government and Policy, 24(3), 403–421. doi: 10.1068/c0416j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1994). A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation. Political Science Quarterly, 109(1), 23–34. doi: 10.2307/2151659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, E. (2012, December 11). Energy policy in an independent Scotland. Scotsman conference, DECC, London.
   Google Scholar
• Degeling, P. (1995). The significance of “sectors” in calls for urban public health intersectoralism: An Australian perspective. Policy and Politics, 23(4), 289–301. doi: 10.1332/030557395782200518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2012). National planning policy framework. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2011a, July). UK renewable energy roadmap. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2011b, July). National policy statement for renewable energy infrastructure (EN-3).London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2012, December). UK renewable energy roadmap update. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2014). Statistical press release: UK energy statistics, March 27, 2014/016. Press Release. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2014b, September). Regional renewable energy statistics. Energy Trends, 49–59. Retrieved from November 7, 2014 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/357527/Renewable_electricity_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change and Department of Communities and Local Government. (2013). Onshore wind: Communities to have a greater say and increased benefit. Press Release, June 6, 13/057.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment. (2009). Planning policy statement 18: Renewable energy. Belfast: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Trade and Industry. (2000). New and renewable energy: Prospects for the 21st century: Conclusions in response to the public consultation. DTI: London.
   Google Scholar
• DETI. (2010). Energy. A strategic framework for Northern Ireland. Belfast: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Eadham, W. (2012). Constructions of the carbon city. In J. Flint & M. Raco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities. Critical reflections (pp. 65–86). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Early, C. (2013). ‘“No veto” for wind farm plans’, Planning, 14 June, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2013). Planning, energy and devolution in the UK. Town Planning Review, 84(3), 397–410. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2013.16
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P. A., & Szarka, J. (2009). Wind power: Is there a “planning problem”? Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 521–547. doi: 10.1080/14649350903441555
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth. (2014, March 28). Re: European commission investigation into UK measures supporting nuclear energy, Hinkley C, State Aid SA.34947 (2013/C), Submission from Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, P. (2002). The greening of nationalism: Nationalising nature in Europe. Environmental Politics, 11(2), 27–48. doi: 10.1080/714000611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F. (2012, May 15). Plans to reform electricity markets ‘unworkable’, says green businesses. The Guardian. Retrieved May 16, 2012 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/15/reform
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2003). Energy, the state, and the market. British energy policy since 1979ct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2009). The UK renewable energy strategy. Cm7686 London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2013). Low carbon nation? London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hvelplund, F., Möller, B., & Sperling, K. (2013). Local ownership, smart energy systems and better wind power economy. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(3), 164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglethorpe, S. (2014, May 20–22). Ill wind or good? ENDS Report, 471.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014, mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J. C. Minx (Eds.)]. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2010). Planners to the rescue: Spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 493–499.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1997a). The complexity of governance and the governance of complexity: Preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance. In A. Amin & J. Hausner (Eds.), Beyond market and hierarchy: Interactive governance and social complexity (pp. 111–147). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1997b). The future of the national state: erosion or reorganization? General reflections on the West European case. Mimeo, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. Retrieved from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Jessop-Governance-and-Metagovernance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005). The political economy of scale and European governance. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(2), 225–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, belief (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, V. (2012). Wind power policy in Germany and the UK: Different choices leading to divergent outcomes. In J. Szarka, R. Cowell, G. Ellis, P. A. Strachan, & C. Warren (Eds.), Learning from wind power. Governance, societal and policy perspectives on sustainable energy (pp. 38–60). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lovins, A. B. (1977). Soft energy paths: Toward a durable peace. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. (Eds.). (1992). Policy networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. (1978). Soft energy, hard politics. Undercurrents, 27, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., & Guy, S. (1997). Creating myths rather than sustainability: The transition fallacies of the new localism. Local Environment, 2(3), 311–318. doi: 10.1080/13549839708725536
   Google Scholar
• May, P., Burby, R. J., Ericksen, N. J., Handmer, J. W., Dixon, J. E., Michaels, S., & Ingle Smith, D. (1996). Environmental management and governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., & Marsden, T. (1995). Space against time: Competing rationalities in planning for housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 368–380. doi: 10.2307/622657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2010). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, S., & Cowell, R. (2012). Wind power and spatial planning in the UK. In J. Szarka, R. Cowell, G. Ellis, P. A. Strachan, & C. Warren (Eds.), Learning from wind power. Governance, societal and policy perspectives on sustainable energy (pp. 61–84). Palgrave: Basingstoke, Hants.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. (2013). From local conflict to national issue: When and how environmental campaigns succeed in transcending the local. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 95–114. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., Turcu, C., Guy, S., & Austin, P. (2013). Mapping the co-evolution of urban energy systems: Pathways of change. Environment and Planning ‘A’, 45(3), 634–649. doi: 10.1068/a45199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2003). Securing a renewable future: Scotland's renewable energy. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2009). National planning framework for Scotland 2. Scottish Government Directorate for the Built Environment, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2011). 2020 Routemap for renewable energy in Scotland. Retrieved September 12, 2012 from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/08/04110353/0
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013). Scotland's future. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish National Party. (2011). Re-elect a Scottish Government working for Scotland, Manifesto 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2014 from http://votesnp.com/campaigns/SNP_Manifesto_2011_lowRes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2009). Scaling the policy response to climate change. Policy and Society, 27, 317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., & Cooper, C. (2013). The Governance of energy megaprojects. Northampton, MA: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2014). Beyond localism: The spatial scale and scaling in energy transitions. In F. Padt, P. Opdam, N. Polman, & C. Termeer (Eds.), Scale-sensitive Governance of the environment (pp. 106–121). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Szarka, J. (2007). Wind power in Europe. Politics, business and society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2005). Modes of governance: A note towards conceptual clarification. European Governance Papers, EUROGOV No. N-05-02. Retrieved from http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/egp-newgove-N-05-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D. (2010). Politics by heuristics: Policy networks with a focus on actor resources, as illustrated by the case of RE policy under new labour. Public Administration, 88(3), 764–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01839.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toke, D., Sherry-Brennan, F., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., & Strachan, P. A. (2013). Scotland, renewable energy and the independence debate: Will head or heart rule the roost? Political Quarterly, 84(1), 61–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.02431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brande, K., Bruyninckx, H., & Happaerts, S. (2012). Introduction. In H. Bruyninckx, S. Happaerts, & K. van den Brande (Eds.), Sustainable development and subnational governments. Policy-making and multi-level interactions (pp. 1–24). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., Bulkeley, H., & Hudson, R. (2008). Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 481–498. doi: 10.1068/c0510j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government. (2005, July). Technical advice note 8: Planning for renewable energy. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government. (2010, March). A low carbon revolution: The Welsh Assembly Government energy policy statement. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government. (2012, March). Energy wales: A low carbon transition. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., McDougall, F. R., & Willmore, J. (2001). Euro-trash: Searching Europe for a more sustainable approach to waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 31(4), 327–346. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00089-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2004). Policy beliefs in spatial decisions: Contrasting core beliefs concerning space making for waste infrastructure. Urban Studies, 41(13), 2669–2690. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000294619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, B., & Mitchell, C. (2011). Learning from experience? The development of the renewable obligation in England and Wales, 2002-2010. Energy Policy, 39(7), 3914–3921. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar