Socio-technical Systems as Place-specific Matters of Concern: The Role of Urban Governance in the Transition of the Wastewater System in Denmark

References

• Berkhout, F. (2002). Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 12(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, R., & Foxon, T. (2013). Urban infrastructure dynamics: Market regulation and the shaping of district energy in UK cities. Environment and Planning A, 45, 2194–2211. doi: 10.1068/a45575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANVA. (2012) Danskvand – Fra kildevand til spildevand [Danish water – From springwater to wastewater], Årgang 80, nr. 3.
   Google Scholar
• DANVA. (2014). DANVA høringssvar på udkast til bekendtgørelse om ændring af bekendtgørelse om spildevandsforsyningsselskabers medfinansiering af kommunale og private projekter vedrørende tag- og overfladevand [DANVA Hearing statement on change of executive order about water utilities’ co-financing of municipal and private projects concerning roof- and surface water]. Retrieved April 24, 201, from http://www.danva.dk/Medlemmer/Holdning/H%C3%B8ringssvar/H%C3%B8ringssvar-2014/Medfinansiering_projekter_tag-overfladevand.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Det økonomiske råd. (2004). Dansk økonomi efteråret 2004 [Danish economy autumn 2004], Det økonomiske råd.
   Google Scholar
• Emelianoff, C. (2014). Local energy transition and multilevel climate governance: The contrasted experiences of two pioneer cities (Hanover, Germany, and Växjö, Sweden). Urban Studies, 51(7), 1378–1393. doi: 10.1177/0042098013500087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstson, H. van der Leeuw, S., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., & Elmqvist, T. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio, 39(8), 531–545. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, C. F. (2013). Integrated urban water management for sustainable transition: Innovation of functions or innovation of place? An explorative study on the evolution and innovation of urban water management practices in Denmark. Doctoral dissertation, Aalborg University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fryd, O., Backhaus, A., Birch, H., Fratini, C. F., Ingvertsen, S. T., Jeppesen, J., … Jensen, M. B. (2013). Water sensitive urban design retrofits in Copenhagen: 40% to the sewer, 60% to the city. Water Science and Technology, 67, 1945–1952. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy, 41, 980–995. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Stategic Management, 20, 521–536. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S. (2006). Designing urban knowledge: Competing perspectives on energy and buildings. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 645–659. doi: 10.1068/c0607j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39, 477–485. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. S., Lauridsen, E. H., Fratini, C. F., & Hoffmann, B. (2015). Harbour bathing and the urban transition of water in Copenhagen: Junctions, mediators and urban navigations. Environment and Planning A, 47, 554–570. doi: 10.1068/a130132p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions – The multilevel perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41, 996–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M., & Swingedow, E. (2000). Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 120–138. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 175–198. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Københavns Kommune. (2011). Københavns Klimatilpasningsplan – kort version [Copenhagen's climate adaptation plan – short version]. Københavns kommune.
   Google Scholar
• Københavns Kommune. (2013). Velkommen til Københavns første klimakvarter [Welcome to Copenhagens first climate quarter]. Københavns Kommune.
   Google Scholar
• Konkurrencestyreslen. (2003). Konkurrenceredegørelse 2003 [Competition account 2003]. Konkurrencestyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews: The sage qualitative research kit. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social – An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LGDK. (2012). Et robust Danmark – Hvordan vi sikrer Danmark mod oversvømmelser. Local government Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 23(1), 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, P. S. (2001). Offentlige afløbssystemer, I: ‘Dansk Infrastrukture I forfald (ATV) [Public sewer systems, 1: Danish infrastructure in decay], 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. (in press). Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Schot, J., & Berkhout, F. (2012). Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Regeringen. (2003). Grøn markedsøkonomi – mere miljø for pengene [engl. Green market economy – more environment for the money]. Regeringen.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice & climate change (Vol. 2, pp. 327–399). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (in press). Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of bus rapid transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2007). Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9, 351–373. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622873
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Beyond localism: The spatial scale and scaling in energy transitions. In F. Padt, P. Opdam, N. Polman, & C. Termeer (Eds.), Scale-sensitive governance of the environment (pp. 106–119). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2014). Conflicting strategies towards sustainable heating at an urban junction of heat infrastructure and building standards. Energy Policy, 78, 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 331–343. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco's hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 9–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderrama, A., & Jørgensen, U. (in press). Creating Copenhagen’s Metro – On the role of protected spaces in arenas of development. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar