Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’

References

• Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. (1966). Negative dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002a). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002b). The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Augenstein, K. (2015). Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility—The case of Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2009). Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Science, 42(4), 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2011). Power in transition: empowering discourses on sustainability transitions (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS).
   Google Scholar
• Berger, G., Feindt, P. H., Holden, E., & Rubik, F. (2014). Sustainable mobility—Challenges for a complex transition. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F. (2006). Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3/4), 299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, B., & Grin, J. (2008). “Doing” reflexive modernization in pig husbandry: The hard work of changing the course of a river. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(4), 480–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, & Joerges. (1996). Travels of ideas: Organizational change as translation. WZB working papers FS II 95–501. Berlin: TU Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, G. (2003). Ideas, bargaining and flexible policy communities: Policy change and the case of the Oxford transport strategy. Public Administration, 81(3), 433–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy, 41(6), 980–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., & Lyons, G. (Eds.). (2012). Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2010). Understanding transitions from a governance perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 221–319). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F., & Mozère, L. (2011). Lignes de fuite: pour un autre monde de possibles. La Tour d'Aigues: Ed. de l'Aube.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phänomenologie des Geistes (Neu herausgegeben von Hans-Friedrich Wessels und Heinrich Clairmont 1988). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., Kivisaari, S., Lovio, R., & Mickwitz, P. (2009). Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 409–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 341–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41(6), 996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. (2014). Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy, 43(2), 278–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Transitioning policy: Co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International books.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., & Lijnis Huffenreuter, R. (2013). Exploring the economic crisis from a transition management perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., & Verbong, G. (Eds.). (2012). Governing the energy transition. Reality, illusion or necessity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Limits of steering. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2012). System innovation as synchronization: Innovation attempts in the Dutch traffic management field (Dissertation). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2014a). Intersections in system innovation: A nested-case methodology to study co-evolving innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(3), 307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2014b). Interactive metal fatigue: A conceptual contribution to social critique in mobilities research. Mobilities. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.942101
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B., Avelino, F. R., & Jhagroe, S. S. (in press). Critical approaches to transition theory. In H. G. Brauch, U. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B., & Boons, F. A. (2010). Transition through subsystem innovation? The case of traffic management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1249–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, C. C., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 999–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Verbong, G. P. J., Schilpzand, W. F., & Witkamp, M. J. (2011). Translation mechanisms in socio-technical niches: A case study of Dutch river management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1063–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (2006). A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance—and its ironies. In J. Voß, R. Kemp, & D. Bauknecht (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 82–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. (2012). The unsustainable directionality of innovation—The example of the broadband transition. Research Policy, 41(9), 1631–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J. (2006). Societal innovation: Between dream and reality lies complexity. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2012). The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2007). Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 351–373.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2011). Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, A., Bertolini, L., & Grin, J. (2013). Transitions of mobility systems in urban regions: A heuristic framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., & Edelenbos, J. (2004). Getting through the ‘twilight zone’: Managing transitions through process-based, horizontal and interactive governance. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 168–190). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. M. (Eds.). (2009). Managing complex governance systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J. P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J., & Nölting, B. (2007). Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, P., & Nieuwenhuis, P. (2012). Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1681–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1997). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown: University Press.
   Google Scholar