The politics of sustainability transitions

References

• Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2005). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3–4), 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2009). Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition. An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(40), 543–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2015). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Angel, D., & Wieczorek, A. (2009). Asian development pathways and sustainable sociotechnical regimes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, (pp. 48–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2010). Interpretive political science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. (2013). The governance of unsustainability: Ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 16–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V. (2015). Innovation territories and energy transitions: Energy, water and modernity in Spain, 1939–1975. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1075195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, J., & Rotmans, R. (2011). Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(1), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaede, J., & Meadowcroft, J. (2015). A question of authenticity: Status quo bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy outlook. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 341–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3–4), 333–350.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. (2014). Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy, 43(2), 278–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. (2013). Theorizing power in transition studies: The role of creativity in novel practices in structural change. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., & Loeber, A. (2015). Exploring the micro-politics in transitions from a practice perspective: The case of greenhouse innovation in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jhagroe, S. (2016). Urban transition politics. How struggles for sustainability are (re)making urban space (Ph.D. thesis). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—the multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41, 996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., Bono, F., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Unravelling the (post-) political in Transition Management: Interrogating Pathways towards Sustainable Change. Journal of Environmental Policy &; Planning, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests: Explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(6), 1116–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhelle, O. (2000). Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). From realpolitik to dingpolitik. Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, 14–44. http://root.ps/download/estrategiasconjuntas/Bruno%20Latour%20Making%20Things%20Public.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 400–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (1983/2010). Redefining politics. People, resources and power. New York, NY: Routledge (Republished edition of the 1983 original).
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2012). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3), 299–314.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Science, 42(4), 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2006). On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Voß, J.-P., & Monstadt, J. (2007). Special issue: Governance for sustainable development: Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3), 185–192.
   Google Scholar
• Paredis, E. (2013). A winding road: Transition management, policy change and the search for sustainable development (doctoral dissertation). Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2012). System innovation as synchronization; innovation attempts in the Dutch traffic management field (Ph.D. thesis). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2015). Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1090903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B., Avelino, F. R., & Jhagroe, S. S. (in press). Critical approaches to transition theory. In H. G. Brauch, U. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (pp. 327–399). Columbus: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach, Part II. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. (2012). The unsustainable directionality of innovation – the example of the broadband transition. Research Policy, 41(9), 1631–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of green transformations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scrase, I., & Smith, A. (2009). The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions. Environmental Politics, 18(15), 707–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2012). The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2008). Transition management and the politics of shape shifting. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1012–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. W. (2007). Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3–4), 351–373.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39, 449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2011). Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Swilling, M., Musango, J., & Wakeford, J. (2015). Developmental states and sustainability transitions: Prospects of a just transition in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Impossible “sustainability” and the post-political condition. In R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox (pp. 185–205). London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vellema, S. (2011). Transformation and sustainability in agriculture: Connecting practice with social theory. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J. P. (2014). Performative policy studies: Realizing “transition management”. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247–274.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2000). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar