Effects and success factors of sustainable consumption policy instruments: a comparative assessment across Europe

References

• Aalto, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2010). Impact assessment paper: Requirements for pubic catering to serve sustainable meals, Finland. Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R., & Vedung, E. (2007). Carrots, sticks and sermons – policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (2010). Process tracing and causal inference. In H. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 207–220). Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biggart, N. W., & Lutzenhiser, L. (2007). Economic sociology and the social problem of energy inefficiency. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1070–1087. doi: 10.1177/0002764207299355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2012). The social construction of technological systems, new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brohmann, B., Brunn, C., Fritsche, U. R., Hünecke, K., Rausch, L., Schönherr, N., … Aalto, K. (2011). Overall approach of material flow analysis and its application to the need areas food and housing, and hypotheses on the impacts of SC instruments. EUPOPP project deliverable 4.1. Retrieved from www.eupopp.net
   Google Scholar
• Brunn, C. (2010). Impact assessment paper: Minimum energy performance standards for buildings in Germany. Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Child, R., Langniss, O., Klink, J., & Gaudioso, D. (2008). Interactions of white certificates with other policy instruments in Europe. Energy Efficiency, 1, 283–295. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, F., Huitema, D., & Woltjer, J. (2009). Participatory decision-making for sustainable consumption. In F. Coenen (Ed.), Public participation and better environmental decisions: The promise and limits of participatory processes for the quality of environmentally related decision-making (pp. 89–110). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. J., & Murphy, J. (2001). Exploring sustainable consumption. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Crabb, A., & Leroy, P. (2008). The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, U., Brohmann, B., & Graulich, K. (2004). Sustainable consumption needs visions. Freiburg: Oeko-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making. A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 417–446. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. (2007). Sustainable consumption and production. In European Environment Agency (Ed.), Europe’s environment. The fourth assessment (pp. 252–289). Copenhagen: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (1999). Symbolic meaning and postmodern consumer culture. In D. Brownlie, M. Saren, R. Wensley, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Rethinking marketing, towards critical marketing accountings (pp. 112–126). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. (1991). Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Politics, 43, 169–195. doi: 10.2307/2010470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, W. J., & Spash, C. L. (2015). The role of consumer sovereignty in sustaining the market economy. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 394–409). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R. H., Wentholt, M. T. A., Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2014). Expert involvement in policy development: A systematic review of current practice. Science and Public Policy, 41, 332–343. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsche, U. R., Brohmann, B., Hünecke, K., Heiskanen, E., Schäfer, B., Fammler, H., & Leung, D. (2012). Sustainable food policies for the EU27: Results from the EUPOPP project. In T. Potthast & S. Meisch (Eds.), Climate change and sustainable development (pp. 259–266). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Geerken, T., & Borup, M. (Eds.). (2009). System innovation for sustainability 2: Case studies in sustainable consumption and production – mobility. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giro, F. (2013, April). The development of biowaste management in Catalonia. 20 years of experience. Presentation at the BIOWASTE conference, Sofia. Retrieved from http://www.moew.government.bg/files/file/Waste/Biowaste/MOEWECNISWA/EN/P19_giro_eng_130327_23slides_2MB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green, K., Harvey, M., & Mcmeekin, A. (2003). Transformations in food consumption and production systems. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5, 145–163. doi: 10.1080/1523908032000121175
   Google Scholar
• Gronow, J., & Warde, A. (Eds.). (2001). Ordinary consumption. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Shove, E. (2000). The sociology of energy, buildings and the environment, constructing knowledge, designing practice. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hak, T., & Dul, J. (2009). Pattern matching. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 663–665). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., & Aalto, K. (2010). Impact assessment paper: The Environmental and Energy Expert scheme, Finland. Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., Brohmann, B., Fritsche, U. R., Schönherr, N., & Aalto, K. (2009). Policies to promote sustainable consumption: Framework for a future-oriented evaluation. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, 6, 387–403. doi: 10.1504/PIE.2009.032326
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., & Schönherr, N. (2009). EUPOPP conceptual framework. EUPOPP project deliverable 1.2. Retrieved from www.eupopp.net
   Google Scholar
• Heyen, D. A., Fischer, C., Barth, R., Brunn, C., Grießhammer, R., Keimeyer, F., & Wolff, F. (2013). Sufficiency – necessity of and options for policy action ( Working Paper 3/2013). Freiburg: Oeko-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, R. E. (2009). Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 175–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of models of consumer behaviour and behavioural change. London: Sustainable Development Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T., Barling, D., & Caraher, M. (2009). Food policy: Integrating health, environment and society. Oxford: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, D. (2010). Impact assessment paper: UK Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT). Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2015). Process tracing and historical explanation. Security Studies, 24, 200–218. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2015.1036610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. (1983). The conditions of effective public policy: A new challenge for policy analysis. Policy & Politics, 11, 123–143. doi: 10.1332/030557383782718779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazo, D., & Alcantud, A. (2010). Impact assessment paper: Selective garbage collection of organic waste specified within the Catalonian Waste Law. Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9, 299–314. doi: 10.1080/15239080701631544
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9, 415–436. doi: 10.1177/1356389003094004
   Google Scholar
• Mont, O. (2007). The role of households in SCP agenda. A one-actor show or concerted action? International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2, 201–214. doi: 10.1504/IJISD.2007.016934
   Google Scholar
• Mont, O., & Dalhammar, C. (2005). Sustainable consumption: At the cross-road of environmental and consumer policies. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 258–279. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2005.009575
   Google Scholar
• Ofgem. (2013). The final report of the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT) 2008-2012. Retrieved from https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/58425/certfinalreport2013300413.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research: Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• de Pelsmacker, P., Janssens, W., Sterckx, E., & Mielants, C. (2005). Consumer preferences for the marketing of ethically labeled coffee. International Marketing Review, 22, 512–530. doi: 10.1108/02651330510624363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14, art. 32. doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13, 137–150. doi: 10.1080/09537320120040491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H. (2003). The role of users in the social shaping of environmental technologies. Innovation, 16, 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Schönherr, N. (2010). Impact assessment paper: German deposit scheme for one-way beverage packaging. Unpublished manuscript within the EUPOPP project.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, I., & Stieß, I. (2008). Linking sustainable consumption to everyday life: A social–ecological approach to consumption research. In A. Tukker, M. Charter, & C. Vezzoli (Eds.), System innovation for sustainability 1: Perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production (pp. 288–300). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time & Society, 22(3), 335–355. doi: 10.1177/0961463X12464228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerton, D., Chappells, H., & van Vliet, B. (Eds.) (2004). Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 687–701. doi: 10.1080/08941920309192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21, 813–822. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Olsen, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Life cycle assessment as a means to identify the most effective action for sustainable consumption. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 131–144). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. M., Pollard, S. J., Angus, A. J., & Rocks, S. A. (2013). Better by design: Rethinking interventions for better environmental regulation. Science of the Total Environment, 447, 488–499. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010). Sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14, 1–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2000). Public policy and program evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. O. (2003). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. O. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2015). Consumer habits and sustainable consumption. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 243–253). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, F., Jacob, K., Guske, A.-L., Heyen, D. A., & Hüsing, T. (2016). Kohärenzprüfung umweltpolitischer Ziele und Instrumente. UBA-Texte. Dessau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, F., & Schönherr, N. (2011). The impact evaluation of sustainable consumption policy instruments. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 43–66. doi: 10.1007/s10603-010-9152-3
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research. Design and methods (5th ed.). London: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Zauberman, G. (2003). The intertemporal dynamics of consumer lock-in. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 405–419. doi: 10.1086/378617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar