The ‘green’ and ‘self’ in green self-governance – a study of 264 green space initiatives by citizens

References

• Apostolopoulou, E., Bormpoudakis, D., Paloniemi, R., Cent, J., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., & Pantis, J. D. (2014). Governance rescaling and the neoliberalization of nature: The case of biodiversity conservation in four EU countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21, 481–494. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2014.979904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnouts, R., van der Zouwen, M., & Arts, B. (2012). Analysing governance modes and shifts – governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (2006). Institutional dynamics in environmental governance (Vol. 1, pp. 1–294). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, Bas, Leroy, Pieter, & van Tatenhove, Jan. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public organization review, 6(2), 93–106. doi: 10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Ayana, A. N., Vandenabeele, N., & Arts, B. (2015). Performance of participatory forest management in Ethiopia: Institutional arrangement versus local practices. Critical Policy Studies, 11(6), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., & de Vries, J. R. (2011). The governance of Natura 2000 sites: The importance of initial choices in the organisation of planning processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 1041–1059. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.549034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). From engagement to co-production: How users and communities contribute to public services. In V Pestoff, T Brandsen, & B Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 35–60). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, Arjen. (2009). Public natures: Social representations of nature and local practices (pp. 1–296). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, A., Mattijssen, T., & Arts, B. (2014). “The man, the administration and the counter-discourse”: An analysis of the sudden turn in Dutch nature conservation policy. Land Use Policy, 38, 676–684. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E., Mattijssen, T. J.M., & Elands, B. H.M. (2016). Betekenis groene burgerinitiatieven voor natuurbeheer. Landschap, 3, 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, Arjen E., Mattijssen, Thomas J.M., & Kamphorst, Dana A. (2013). Framing: de strijd om het nieuwe natuurbeleidsverhaal. Landschap, 1, 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, Arjen E., Mattijssen, Thomas J.M., & Kamphorst, Dana A. (2013). Framing: de strijd om het nieuwe natuurbeleidsverhaal. Landscap, 30(1), 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Buizer, M., Elands, B. H. M., Mattijssen, T. J. M., van der Jagt, A., Ambrose-Oji, B., Geroházi, E., & Santos, E. (2015). The governance of urban green spaces in selected EU-cities, p. 97. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Derkzen, P., & Bock, B. (2009). Partnership and role perception, three case studies on the meaning of being a representative in rural partnerships. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 75–89. doi: 10.1068/c0791b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. (2005). Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance, 18, 111–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fors, H., Molin, J. F., Murphy, M. A., & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. (2015). User participation in urban green spaces – for the people or the parks? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 722–734. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. (1998). The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas. Journal of Rural Studies, 14, 5–12. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00043-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson, D., Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (1997). Evidence, inference, and the ‘rejection’ of the significance test. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 64–70. doi: 10.1080/00049539708259855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 344 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, A., & Magid, J. (2013). The role of local government in promoting sustainable urban agriculture in Dar es Salaam and Copenhagen. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113, 121–132. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2013.848612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesen, R. (2014). How much evidence should one collect? Philosophical Studies, 172, 2299–2313. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0411-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European Online Integration Papers, 5, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90, 459–488. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J., Juhola, S., & Landauer, M. (in press). Local authorities and the engagement of private actors in climate change adaptation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy .
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, J., Pietrzyk-Kaszynska, A., Zbieg, A., & Zak, B. (2015). Wasting collaboration potential: A study in urban green space governance in a post-transition country. Environmental Science and Policy, 62, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., & Ambrose-Oji, B. (2015). Beauty, friends, power, money: Navigating the impacts of community woodlands. Geographical Journal, 181, 268–279. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., De Vreese, R., Johnston, M., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C., & Sanesi, G. (2013). Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 12, 464–473. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattijssen, T. J. M., Behagel, J. H., & Buijs, A. E. (2014). How democratic innovations realise democratic goods. Two case studies of area committees in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(6), 997–1014. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.905460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattijssen, T., Buijs, A., & Elands, B. (in press). Self-governance in nature conservation: From benefits to co-benefits of active citizenship. Journal for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Mattijssen, T., Van der Jagt, S., Buijs, A., Elands, B., Erlwein, S., & Lafortezza, R. (in press). The long-term prospects of citizens managing urban green space: from place-making to place keeping? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milana, M. (2008). Is the European (active) citizenship ideal fostering inclusion within the union? A critical review. European Journal of Education, 43, 207–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state – co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20, 339–360. doi: 10.1177/0956247808096117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro, G. (2012). Citizens in Europe: Civic activism and the community democratic experiment (pp. 1–210). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Cent, J., Bormpoudakis, D., Scott, A., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., … Pantis, J. D. (2015). Public participation and environmental justice in biodiversity governance in Finland, Greece, Poland and the UK. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 330–342. doi: 10.1002/eet.1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. A. (2010). Green spaces of self-interest within shared urban governance. Geography Compass, 4, 255–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00308.x
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Imrie, R. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning A, 32, 2187–2204. doi: 10.1068/a3365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, M. (2010). Public participation in post-fordist urban green space governance: The case of community gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 548–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice – new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68, 2490–2497. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1997). Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27, 283–308. doi: 10.1177/004839319702700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social. A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change (pp. 1–296). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2012). A primer on practices. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, & S. Billett (Eds.), Practice-based education. Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13–27). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2011). ‘European governance’ or governmentality? The European commission and the future of democratic government. European Law Journal, 17, 287–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., Pereira, M., Hull, A., & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. 2014. The governance of open space: Decision-making around place-keeping, Place-Keeping: Open Space Management in Practice, pp. 52–75.
   Google Scholar
• Søgaard, A. J., Selmer, R., Bjertness, E., & Thelle, D. (2004). The Oslo health study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. International Journal for Equity in Health. Article no. 3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Triantafillou, P. (2009). The politics of self-governance (pp. 1–223). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, J. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Teles, F. (2012). Local governance, identity and social capital: A framework for administrative reform. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 7, 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate, B., Dirkx, J., Hinssen, P., van Koppen, K., & Vader, J. (2013). Burgerinitiatieven zijn beter voor de natuur. Of niet? Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• Thuessen, A. A. (2010). Is LEADER Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG boards in the 2007-2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes. Sociologica Ruralis, 50(1), 31–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2015). Longing for Wikitopia: The study and politics of self-organisation. Urban Studies, 52, 2301–2312. doi: 10.1177/0042098015577334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Governance and it’s categories. In K. Van Assche, R. Beunen, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutional governance theory: An introduction (pp. 65–78). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam, R., Duineveld, M., & During, R. (2015). Delineating active citizenship: The subjectification of citizens’ initiatives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17, 163–179. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.918502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam, R., Eshuis, J., & Aarts, N. (2009). Transition starts with people: Self-organising communities ADM and golf residence Dronten, Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas, pp. 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam, R., Salverda, I., & During, R. (2014). Strategies of citizens’ initiatives in the Netherlands: Connecting people and institutions. Critical Policy Studies, 323–339. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.857473
   Google Scholar
• Van der Jagt, A. P. N., Elands, B. H. M., Ambrose-Oji, B., Gerőházi, E., & Steen Møller, M. (2016). Participatory governance of urban green space: Trends and practices in the EU. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Van Melik, R., & Van Der Krabben, E. (2016). Co-production of public space: Policy translations from New York City to the Netherlands. Town Planning Review, 87, 139–158. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2016.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (2000). Political modernisation and the environment. The renewal of environmental policy arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., & Tonkens, E. (2013). Talking active citizenship: Framing welfare state reform in England and the Netherlands. Social Policy and Society, 12, 415–426. doi: 10.1017/S1474746413000158
   Google Scholar