494
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Water and the politics of sustainability transitions: from regime actor conflicts to system governance organizations

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 128-142 | Received 24 Jan 2017, Accepted 07 Jun 2017, Published online: 21 Jun 2017

References

  • American Rivers. (2008). Hidden reservoirs: Why water efficiency is the best solution for the Southeast. Retrieved from http://americanrivers.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/hidden-reservoir-report.pdf
  • Ashworth, J., & Jensen, R. (2011). Texas water resources. In R. Griffin (Ed.), Water policy in Texas: Responding to the rise of scarcity (pp. 8–25). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
  • Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 557–567. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
  • Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(4), 543–569. doi: 10.1177/1368431009349830
  • Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 628–649. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
  • Balling, R. C., Gober, P., & Jones, N. (2008). Sensitivity of residential water consumption to variations in climate: An intraurban analysis of Phoenix, Arizona. Water Resources Research, 44(10), W10401. doi: 10.1029/2007WR006722
  • Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sanden, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003
  • Borden, S. (2014). Thirsty city: Politics, greed, and the making of Atlanta’s water crisis. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Chattahoochee Riverkeeper. (2012). Filling the water gap: conservation successes and missed opportunities in metro Atlanta. Retrieved from http://chattahoochee.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FillingWaterGap.pdf
  • City of Phoenix. (2011). Water resources plan. Retrieved from https://www.phoenix.gov/waterservicessite/Documents/wsd2011wrp.pdf
  • City of Phoenix. (2016). Historical and population water use. Retrieved from https://www.phoenix.gov/waterservices/resourcesconservation/yourwater/historicaluse
  • Daly, H. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Dedekorkut, A. (2005). Tampa Bay water wars: From conflict to collaboration? In J. Scholz & B. Stiftel (Eds.), Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutes for collaborative planning (pp. 52–63). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Eckhardt, G. (2015). Laws and regulations applicable to the Edwards Aquifer. Retrieved from http://www.edwardsaquifer.net/rules.html
  • Elzen, B., Geels, F., Leeuwis, C., & van Mierlo, B. (2011). Normative contestation in transitions ‘in the making’: Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry. Research Policy, 40(2), 263–265. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.018
  • Feunfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of sociotechnical regimes – conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772–791. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
  • Feunfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The interplay of actors, institutions, and technologies in socio-technical systems – an analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 298–312. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023
  • Geels, F. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon energy transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture, and Society, 31(5), 21–40. doi: 10.1177/0263276414531627
  • Gilligan, J.M., Wold, C.A., Worland, S.C., Nay, J.J., Hess, D.J., & Hornberger, G.M. (2017). Urban water conservation policies in the United States. Vanderbilt Institute for Energy and Environment.
  • Grin, J. (2012). The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture: Conceptual understanding and implications for transition management. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 72–89. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2012.044035
  • Hawkins, C., Hu, Q., & Feiock, R. (2016). Self-organizing government of local economic development: Informal networks and regional institutions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 643–660. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12280
  • Hendriks, C. M. (2008). On inclusion and network governance: The democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions. Public Administration, 86(4), 1009–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00738.x
  • Hess, D. J. (2016a). The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.002
  • Hess, D. J. (2016b). Undone science: Social movements, mobilized publics, and industrial transitions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hess, D. J., Wold, C. A., Worland, S. C., & Hornberger, G. M. (2017). Measuring urban water conservation policies: Toward a comprehensive index. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 53(2), 442–455. doi:10.1111/jawr.2017.53.issue-2 doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12506
  • Hirt, P., Gustafson, A., & Larson, K. (2008). Mirage in the Valley of the Sun. Environmental History, 13(3), 482–514. doi: 10.1093/envhis/13.3.482
  • Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. 2014). The politics of river basin organizations: Coalitions, institutional design choices, and consequences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Kaiser, R. (2011). Texas water law and organizations. In Ronald Griffin (Ed.), Water policy in Texas: Responding to the rise of scarcity (pp. 26–48). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
  • Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4093–4103. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
  • Larson, K., Gustafson, A., & Hirt, P. (2009). Insatiable thirst and a finite supply: An assessment of municipal water conservation policy in phoenix, 1980-2007. Journal of Policy History, 21(2), 107–137. doi: 10.1017/S0898030609090058
  • Lathrop, A. (2009). A tale of three states: Equitable apportionment of the Apalocihocola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin. Florida State Law Review, 36(4/6), 865–901.
  • Lauber, V., & Jacobsson, S. (2016). The politics and economics of constructing, contesting, and restricting socio-political space for renewables. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 147–163. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.005
  • Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change: Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
  • Missimer, T. (2014). Water crisis: The metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, water supply conflict. Water Policy, 16(4), 669–699. doi: 10.2166/wp.2014.131
  • Padt, F., Opdam, P., Polman, N., & Termeer, C. (2014). Scale-sensitive governance of the environment. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Pel, B. (2016). Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 673–691. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1090903
  • Rand, H. (2003). Water wars: A story of people, politics, and power. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
  • Raven, R., Schot, J., & Berkhout, F. (2012). Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001
  • San Antonio Water System. (2015). Semi-annual water management report. January–June 2015. Retrieved from http://www.saws.org/Your_Water/WaterResources/2012_WMP/docs/WaterMgmtSemiannualReport_Jan-June%202015_final.pdf
  • Schlager, E., & Bloomquist, W. (2008). Embracing watershed politics. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
  • Smink, M. M., Hekkert, M., & Negro, S. (2015). Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(2), 86–101. doi: 10.1002/bse.1808
  • Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
  • Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions – dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change toward sustainability. European Planning A, 20(3), 461–479. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651800
  • Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
  • Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. (2013). The destabilization of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967). Research Policy, 42, 1749–1767. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009
  • Verhees, B., Raven, R., Veraart, F., Smith, A., & Kern, F. (2013). The development of solar PV in the Netherlands: A case of survival in unfriendly contexts. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 275–289. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.011
  • Voss, G.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
  • Votteler, T. (2004). Raiders of the lost aquifer? Or, the beginning of the end to fifty years of conflict over the Texas Edwards aquifer. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 15, 257–335.
  • Votteler, T. (2011). The Edwards aquifer: Hydrology, ecology, history, and law. In R. Griffin (Ed.), Water policy in Texas: Responding to the rise of scarcity (pp. 78–106). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
  • Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability, and the governance of transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3–4), 213–225. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622840

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.