Scale in environmental governance: moving from concepts and cases to consolidation

References

• Albert, C., von Haaren, C., Othengrafen, F., Krätzig, S., & Saathoff, W. (2017). Scaling policy conflicts in ecosystem services governance: A framework for spatial analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5), Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1075194
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B, & Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 255–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., Esguerra, A., & Goerg, C. (2017). The co-production of scale and power: The case of the millennium ecosystem assessment and the intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5). Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1523908X.2014.984668
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2010). The scaling of water governance tasks: A comparative federal analysis of the European union and Australia. Environmental Management, 46(1), 7–16. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9354-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces. Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24, 875–902. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., … Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11, 8. doi: 10.5751/ES-01759-110208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2017). Rescaling the governance of renewable energy: Lessons from the UK devolution experience. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5).
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., PritchardJr, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (1998). The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions, IHDP Working Paper No. 2, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Friis, C., Nielsen, J. O., Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., & Hostert, P. (2016). From teleconnection to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(2), 131–153. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2015.1096423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruby, R. L., & Basurto, X. (2014). Multi-level governance for large marine commons: Politics and polycentricity in Palau's protected area network. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. (2008). Global change: Analyzing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change. Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüesker, F., & Moss, T. (2015). The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: Implementing the EU water framework directive (WFD). Land Use Policy, 42, 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. A. (2011). Scale and governance: Conceptual considerations and practical implications. Ecology and Society, 16(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-04160-160223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Becker, S. T., & Mehl, C. (2017). Scalar dynamics and implications of ambient Air quality management in the EU. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(5).
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Newig, J., & Challies, E. (2016). Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25, 136–159. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: Some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61, 169–179. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2012). Spatial Fit, from Panacea to practice: Implementing the EU water framework directive. Ecology and Society, 17(3), http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art2/ doi: 10.5751/ES-04821-170302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. P. (2009). Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 398–406. doi: 10.1177/0309132508096353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Koontz, T. M. (2014). Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 248–267. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Schulz, D., & Jager, N. W. (2016). Disentangling puzzles of spatial scales and participation in environmental governance – The case of governance re-scaling through the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Management, 58, 998–1014. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493–535. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M., & Bruyneel, S. (2010). Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: A three-dimensional review. Progress in Human Geography, 34(5), 646–653. doi: 10.1177/0309132509354836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles, J. S., & Baggio, J. A. (2017). Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 E1776–E1785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzer, J. (2017). How subnational governments are rescaling environmental governance: The case of the Brazilian State of São Paulo. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5).
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Scaled geographies: Nature, place, and the politics of scale. In R. McMaster, & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method (pp. 129–153). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N., & Termeer, C. (2017). The power to frame the scale? Analysing scalar politics over, in and of a deliberative governance process. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(5).
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change. Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar