The acceptability of wind farms: the impact of public participation

References

• Agterbosch, S., Meertens, R. M., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2009). The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, M. (2010). A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: Empowerment or social control? Planning Theory, 9(3), 248–264. doi: 10.1177/1473095210366193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, M., Haggett, C., & Rudolph, D. (2016). Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: Awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(4), 557–576. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1218919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, D. J. (2007). Stakeholders or subject matter experts, who should be consulted? Energy Policy, 35, 2336–2346. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005). The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14(4), 460–477. doi: 10.1080/09644010500175833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Gray, T., Haggett C., & Swaffield, J. (2013). Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: Public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, D. (2016). Thinking through participation in renewable energy decisions. Nature Energy, 1, 1–4. doi: 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botterill, L. C., & Cockfield, G. (2016). The relative importance of landscape amenity and health impacts in the wind farm debate in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(4), 447–462. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1138400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckner, T., Bashmakov, I. A., Mulugetta, Y., Chum, H., de la Vega Navarro, A., Edmonds, J., Faaij, A. … Zhang, X. (2014). Energy systems. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, Adler A. … Minx, J. C. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 511–597). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleby, A. M., Miller, D. R., & Aspinall, P. A. (2009). Public attitudes and participation in wind turbine development. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(1), 69–95. doi: 10.1142/S1464333209003221
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., Witt, G. B., & Lacey, J. (2016). How wind became a four-letter word: Lessons for community engagement from a wind energy conflict in King Island, Australia. Energy Policy, 98, 483–494. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corscadden, K., Wile, A., & Yiridoe, E. (2012). Social license and consultation criteria for community wind projects. Renewable Energy, 44, 392–397. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. (2010). Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning – The construction of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales. Land Use Policy, 27, 222–232. doi:10.2016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Public engagement with renewable energy: Introduction. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public, from NIMBY to Participation (pp. xxi). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, E. (2005). Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden. Wind Engineering, 29(6), 503–511. doi: 10.1260/030952405776234580
   Google Scholar
• Dimitropoulos, A., & Kontoleon, A. (2009). Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: A choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energy Policy, 37, 1842–1854. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Climate Action. (2014). Special Eurobarometer 409: Climate change. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/support/docs/report_2014_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eltham, D. C., Harrison, G. P., & Allen, S. J. (2008). Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning. Energy Policy, 36, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energiateollisuus ry. (2015). Suomalaisten Energia-asenteet [Energy attitudes in Finland 2015]. Retrieved from http://energia.fi/sites/default/files/energia_asenteet_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, J., Kempton, W., Lilley, M. B., & Samoteskul, K. (2012). Public acceptance of offshore wind power: Does perceived fairness of process matter? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(10), 1387–1402. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.688658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournis, Y., & Fortin, M.-J. (2016). From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: Towards a territorial perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1133406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35, 2727–2736. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R. (2010). Wind farms and community engagement in Australia: A critical analysis for policy learning. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 4, 541–563. doi:10.1007/s12280-010-9155-9 doi: 10.1215/s12280-010-9155-9
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R., & Matthews, C. (2008). Deliberative speak at the turbine face: Community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10(3), 217–232. doi: 10.1080/15239080802242662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, M., & Gupta, J. (2015). The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science & Policy, 50, 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jami, A. A. N., & Walsh, P. R. (2014). The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: The case study of Ontario, Canada. Renewable Energy, 68, 194–202. doi:10.1016/j.remene.2014.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jami, A. A. N., & Walsh, P. R. (2017). From consultation to collaboration: A participatory framework for positive community engagement with wind energy projects in Ontario, Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 27, 14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobert, A., Laborgne, P., & Mimler, S. (2007). Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy, 35, 2751–2760. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., & Laike, T. (2007). Intentions to respond to local wind turbines: The role of attitudes and visual perception. Wind Energy, 10, 435–451. doi: 10.1002/we.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., & Eiser, J. R. (2009). Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy, 37, 4604–4614. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopper, L. D., & Ollson, C. A. (2011). Health effects and wind turbines: A review of the literature. Environmental Health, 10(78), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontogianni, A., Tourkolias, C., Skourtos, M., & Damigos, D. (2014). Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms. Renewable Energy, 66, 170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, S., & Damborg, S. (1999). On public attitudes towards wind power. Renewable Energy, 16, 954–960. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00339-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuusiniemi, K., Ekroos, A., Kumpula, A., & Vihervuori, P. (2013). Ympäristöoikeus. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Langbroek, M., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk, The Netherlands. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(3), 167–178. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.706943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. L. (2015). Challenging public engagement: Participation, deliberation and power in renewable energy policy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(3), 631–640. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0328-7
   Google Scholar
• McLaren Loring, J. (2007). Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: Factors influencing project success. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2648–2660. doi:10.1016./j.enpol.2006.10.008 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, B. (2010). Spatial analyses of emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark. Land Use Policy, 27, 233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motosu, M., & Maruyama, Y. (2016). Local acceptance by people with unvoiced opinions living close to a wind farm: A case study from Japan. Energy Policy, 91, 362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska, M. A., Zaborowski, K., Zamojska-Daniszewska, M., & Waszkowska, M. (2014). Evaluation of annoyance from the wind turbine noise: A pilot study. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 27(3), 364–388. doi: 10.2478/s13382-014-0252-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuer, A. (2016). The establishment of citizen power plants in Austria: A process of empowerment? Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. A new model for enhancing children’s participation in decision-making, in line with article 12.1 of the United Nations Convention on the rights of the child. Children and Society, 15, 107–117. doi: 10.1002/chi.617
   Google Scholar
• Slee, B. (2015). Is there a case for community-based equity participation in Scottish on-shore wind energy production? Gaps in evidence and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 540–549. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford, J., & Slattery M. (2010). Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy, 38, 2508–2519. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, R. L., & Freeman, C. M. (1987). Altamont: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 379–398. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(87)90051-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toke, D., Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 1129–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tritter, J. Q., & McCallum, A. (2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 76, 156–168. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy, 35, 2705–2714. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, D.& Toke, D. (2010). Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; Local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England. Land Use Policy, 27(2010), 214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldo, Å. (2012). Offshore wind power in Sweden – A qualitative analysis of attitudes with particular focus on opponents. Energy Policy, 41, 692–702. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. & Baxter, J. (2017). ‘It’s easy to throw rocks at a corporation’: Wind energy development and distributive justice in Canada. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 153: 1–15. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1267614
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O’Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). ‘Green on green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–875. doi: 10.1080/09640560500294376
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. R., & McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy, 27, 204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 1, 49–64. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(6), 1188–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind power – Protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27, 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.lanusepol.2009.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2013). Wind power: Basic challenge concerning social acceptance. In M. Kaltschmitt, N. J. Themelis, L. Y. Bronicki, L. Söder, & L. A. Vega (Eds.), Renewable energy systems (pp. 1785–1821). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5820-3
   Google Scholar
• World Wind Energy Association. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.wwindea.org/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Z. A. (2012). A voice for the community: Public participation in energy development. Dahlhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 8(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar